From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: Jag Raman <jag.raman@oracle.com>
Cc: Elena Ufimtseva <elena.ufimtseva@oracle.com>,
fam@euphon.net, Swapnil Ingle <swapnil.ingle@nutanix.com>,
John G Johnson <john.g.johnson@oracle.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kraxel@redhat.com, quintela@redhat.com,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
armbru@redhat.com, kanth.ghatraju@oracle.com, felipe@nutanix.com,
thuth@redhat.com, ehabkost@redhat.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com,
dgilbert@redhat.com, liran.alon@oracle.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
rth@twiddle.net, kwolf@redhat.com, berrange@redhat.com,
mreitz@redhat.com, ross.lagerwall@citrix.com,
marcandre.lureau@gmail.com, thanos.makatos@nutanix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/21] Initial support for multi-process qemu
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 12:21:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200713112100.GG28639@stefanha-x1.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4316F79B-02ED-40D7-A1B2-7EA9D2EBA32A@oracle.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1337 bytes --]
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 10:16:31AM -0400, Jag Raman wrote:
> > On Jul 2, 2020, at 9:40 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 10:09:22AM -0700, elena.ufimtseva@oracle.com wrote:
> > makes sense to me and I see how it forms the base on which
> > VFIO-over-socket and smaller remote program builds using Kconfig can be
> > developed.
> >
> > My main concern is that the object lifecycle has not been fully
> > implemented in the proxy and remote device. Error handling is
>
> Thank you for your feedback on. FWIW, we did check about the unrealize() path
> in the object lifecycle management. We noticed that the destructor for the PCI
> devices (pci_qdev_unrealize()) is currently not invoking the instance specific
> destructor/unrealize functions. While this is not an excuse for not implementing
> the unrealize functions, it currently doesn’t have an impact on the hot unplug path.
>
> You’re correct, we should implement the unrealize/destructor for the Proxy & remote
> objects. We’ll also look into any background for why the PCI devices don’t call
> instance specific destructor.
PCIDeviceClass->exit() is invoked by pci_qdev_unrealize(). I'm not sure
why it's called "exit" instead of "unrealize" but PCI devices implement
it to perform clean-up.
Stefan
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-13 11:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-27 17:09 [PATCH v7 00/21] Initial support for multi-process qemu elena.ufimtseva
2020-06-27 17:09 ` [PATCH v7 01/21] memory: alloc RAM from file at offset elena.ufimtseva
2020-06-30 14:59 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-06-27 17:09 ` [PATCH v7 02/21] multi-process: Add config option for multi-process QEMU elena.ufimtseva
2020-06-30 14:57 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-06-27 17:09 ` [PATCH v7 03/21] multi-process: setup PCI host bridge for remote device elena.ufimtseva
2020-06-30 15:17 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-07-09 14:23 ` Jag Raman
2020-06-27 17:09 ` [PATCH v7 04/21] multi-process: setup a machine object for remote device process elena.ufimtseva
2020-06-30 15:26 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-06-27 17:09 ` [PATCH v7 05/21] multi-process: add qio channel function to transmit elena.ufimtseva
2020-06-30 15:29 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-06-27 17:09 ` [PATCH v7 06/21] multi-process: define MPQemuMsg format and transmission functions elena.ufimtseva
2020-06-30 15:53 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-06-27 17:09 ` [PATCH v7 07/21] multi-process: add co-routines to communicate with remote elena.ufimtseva
2020-06-30 18:31 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-06-27 17:09 ` [PATCH v7 08/21] multi-process: Initialize communication channel at the remote end elena.ufimtseva
2020-07-01 6:44 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-06-27 17:09 ` [PATCH v7 09/21] multi-process: Initialize message handler in remote device elena.ufimtseva
2020-07-01 6:53 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-06-27 17:09 ` [PATCH v7 10/21] multi-process: setup memory manager for " elena.ufimtseva
2020-07-01 7:58 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-06-27 17:09 ` [PATCH v7 11/21] multi-process: introduce proxy object elena.ufimtseva
2020-07-01 8:58 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-06-27 17:09 ` [PATCH v7 12/21] multi-process: Connect Proxy Object with device in the remote process elena.ufimtseva
2020-07-01 9:20 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-07-24 16:57 ` Jag Raman
2020-07-27 13:18 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-07-27 13:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-07-31 18:31 ` Jag Raman
2020-06-27 17:09 ` [PATCH v7 13/21] multi-process: Forward PCI config space acceses to " elena.ufimtseva
2020-07-01 9:40 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-06-27 17:09 ` [PATCH v7 14/21] multi-process: PCI BAR read/write handling for proxy & remote endpoints elena.ufimtseva
2020-07-01 10:41 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-06-27 17:09 ` [PATCH v7 15/21] multi-process: Synchronize remote memory elena.ufimtseva
2020-07-01 10:55 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-06-27 17:09 ` [PATCH v7 16/21] multi-process: create IOHUB object to handle irq elena.ufimtseva
2020-07-02 12:09 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-06-27 17:09 ` [PATCH v7 17/21] multi-process: Retrieve PCI info from remote process elena.ufimtseva
2020-07-02 12:59 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-06-27 17:09 ` [PATCH v7 18/21] multi-process: heartbeat messages to remote elena.ufimtseva
2020-07-02 13:16 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-06-27 17:09 ` [PATCH v7 19/21] multi-process: perform device reset in the remote process elena.ufimtseva
2020-07-02 13:19 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-06-27 17:09 ` [PATCH v7 20/21] multi-process: add the concept description to docs/devel/qemu-multiprocess elena.ufimtseva
2020-07-02 13:31 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-06-27 17:09 ` [PATCH v7 21/21] multi-process: add configure and usage information elena.ufimtseva
2020-07-02 13:26 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-07-02 13:40 ` [PATCH v7 00/21] Initial support for multi-process qemu Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-07-09 14:16 ` Jag Raman
2020-07-13 11:21 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200713112100.GG28639@stefanha-x1.localdomain \
--to=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=elena.ufimtseva@oracle.com \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=felipe@nutanix.com \
--cc=jag.raman@oracle.com \
--cc=john.g.johnson@oracle.com \
--cc=kanth.ghatraju@oracle.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=liran.alon@oracle.com \
--cc=marcandre.lureau@gmail.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=ross.lagerwall@citrix.com \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=swapnil.ingle@nutanix.com \
--cc=thanos.makatos@nutanix.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).