From: Andrey Shinkevich <andrey.shinkevich@virtuozzo.com>
To: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>,
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"qemu-block@nongnu.org" <qemu-block@nongnu.org>
Cc: "kwolf@redhat.com" <kwolf@redhat.com>,
Denis Lunev <den@virtuozzo.com>,
"mreitz@redhat.com" <mreitz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH v5 6/6] iotests: extend sleeping time under Valgrind
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 15:24:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <421d92ed-0eb1-6e45-f080-0198c1739e17@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <27a1a3e5-3ebd-2e64-a36e-e8e4728b2b6d@redhat.com>
On 27/08/2019 22:42, John Snow wrote:
>
>
> On 8/23/19 11:27 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>> 16.08.2019 4:01, John Snow wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7/19/19 12:30 PM, Andrey Shinkevich wrote:
>>>> To synchronize the time when QEMU is running longer under the Valgrind,
>>>> increase the sleeping time in the test 247.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrey Shinkevich <andrey.shinkevich@virtuozzo.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> tests/qemu-iotests/247 | 6 +++++-
>>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/247 b/tests/qemu-iotests/247
>>>> index 546a794..c853b73 100755
>>>> --- a/tests/qemu-iotests/247
>>>> +++ b/tests/qemu-iotests/247
>>>> @@ -57,7 +57,11 @@ TEST_IMG="$TEST_IMG.4" _make_test_img $size
>>>> {"execute":"block-commit",
>>>> "arguments":{"device":"format-4", "top-node": "format-2", "base-node":"format-0", "job-id":"job0"}}
>>>> EOF
>>>> -sleep 1
>>>> +if [ "${VALGRIND_QEMU}" == "y" ]; then
>>>> + sleep 10
>>>> +else
>>>> + sleep 1
>>>> +fi
>>>> echo '{"execute":"quit"}'
>>>> ) | $QEMU -qmp stdio -nographic -nodefaults \
>>>> -blockdev file,node-name=file-0,filename=$TEST_IMG.0,auto-read-only=on \
>>>>
>>>
>>> This makes me nervous, though. Won't this race terribly? (Wait, why
>>> doesn't it race already?)
>>>
>>
>> Hmm, however it works somehow. I'm afraid that everything with "sleep" is definitely racy..
>> Or what do you mean?
>>
>
> Right -- anything with a sleep is already at risk for racing.
>
> What I am picking up on here is that with valgrind, there is an even
> greater computational overhead that's much harder to predict, so I was
> wondering how these values were determined.
>
I just followed the trend and extended the sleeping time with a grater
tolerance so that the test could pass on systems where the 'sleep 1'
command helps to pass without Valgrind. We could rewrite the test 247 in
Python in a separate series, shall we?
Andrey
> (I wouldn't withhold an RB for that alone -- the sleeps are existing
> problems.)
>
> What I moved on to wondering in particular is why test 247 doesn't
> already have race problems, because it looks quite fragile.
>
> Neither of these are really Andrey's problems; I was just surprised
> momentarily that I don't see 247 fail more often already, as-is.
>
> --js
>
--
With the best regards,
Andrey Shinkevich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-28 15:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-19 16:30 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/6] Allow Valgrind checking all QEMU processes Andrey Shinkevich
2019-07-19 16:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 1/6] iotests: allow " Andrey Shinkevich
2019-08-15 22:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " John Snow
2019-08-25 15:26 ` Andrey Shinkevich
2019-08-27 19:56 ` John Snow
2019-08-28 15:04 ` Andrey Shinkevich
2019-07-19 16:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 2/6] iotests: exclude killed processes from running under Valgrind Andrey Shinkevich
2019-08-16 0:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " John Snow
2019-07-19 16:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 3/6] iotests: Add casenotrun report to bash tests Andrey Shinkevich
2019-08-16 0:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " John Snow
2019-08-16 20:33 ` Cleber Rosa
2019-08-25 13:03 ` Andrey Shinkevich
2019-07-19 16:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 4/6] iotests: Valgrind fails with nonexistent directory Andrey Shinkevich
2019-08-16 0:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " John Snow
2019-08-25 15:24 ` Andrey Shinkevich
2019-08-27 19:45 ` John Snow
2019-08-28 15:12 ` Andrey Shinkevich
2019-07-19 16:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 5/6] iotests: extended timeout under Valgrind Andrey Shinkevich
2019-08-16 0:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " John Snow
2019-07-19 16:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 6/6] iotests: extend sleeping time " Andrey Shinkevich
2019-08-16 1:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " John Snow
2019-08-23 15:27 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-08-27 19:42 ` John Snow
2019-08-28 15:24 ` Andrey Shinkevich [this message]
2019-08-28 17:27 ` John Snow
2019-08-25 10:13 ` Andrey Shinkevich
2019-08-06 16:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/6] Allow Valgrind checking all QEMU processes Andrey Shinkevich
2019-08-16 20:05 ` Cleber Rosa
2019-08-25 10:30 ` Andrey Shinkevich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=421d92ed-0eb1-6e45-f080-0198c1739e17@virtuozzo.com \
--to=andrey.shinkevich@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=den@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).