From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55D45C433C1 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 17:37:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01946600EF for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 17:37:09 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 01946600EF Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:46362 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOkxo-0002zQ-Vj for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 13:37:09 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50448) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOk0X-0006rb-FE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 12:35:54 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:22357) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOk0P-0001yf-2Q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 12:35:52 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1616517344; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=s8ZzgcBIDvA8nFPW1oj4TnVwkGAbdvgIlha6CMX8Mf0=; b=RIRzH9D8qb8GzWxCzlYIyYNZUP4VsJ7AnQ6k3T69+BgZu6n/G+Ci7agku81WtE8rkjlebG Tz7NGjKPE9UFEyGm/npxQm9ZXCSqzgKqBnw94PiC2T5E9xKgk01qvyRpdfZ0BUQ05vRkry TlgrmyUN9GVckrUNdRbcP2KbC+edmVM= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-525-Y6KcmnXKNcKlDb18uust5g-1; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 12:35:41 -0400 X-MC-Unique: Y6KcmnXKNcKlDb18uust5g-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42D98107ACCA; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 16:35:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blackfin.pond.sub.org (ovpn-114-17.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.114.17]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6829B10023B5; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 16:35:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by blackfin.pond.sub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EFD2211327E1; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 17:35:34 +0100 (CET) From: Markus Armbruster To: Eric Blake Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/28] qapi: Rename pragma *-whitelist to *-exceptions References: <20210323094025.3569441-1-armbru@redhat.com> <20210323094025.3569441-20-armbru@redhat.com> <1fc0b9e1-94c2-b349-4429-3c63fd6628ad@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 17:35:34 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1fc0b9e1-94c2-b349-4429-3c63fd6628ad@redhat.com> (Eric Blake's message of "Tue, 23 Mar 2021 10:09:15 -0500") Message-ID: <87lfadomjt.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=armbru@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=armbru@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: michael.roth@amd.com, jsnow@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, marcandre.lureau@redhat.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Eric Blake writes: > On 3/23/21 4:40 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> Rename pragma returns-whitelist to command-returns-exceptions, and >> name-case-whitelist to member-name-case-exceptions. >> >> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster >> --- > Doesn't mention anything about the motivation for this including the > desire to move away from the term "whitelist". But the change is good > regardless of motive. I'd prefer not to argue for or against words that may or may not have unwanted connotations. In this particular case, however, I think "exceptions" is actually clearer than "whitelist". Naming is hard. > Reviewed-by: Eric Blake Thanks!