From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: "Kevin Wolf" <kwolf@redhat.com>,
"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, mszeredi@redhat.com,
"Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"QEMU Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
"Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>,
"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"Marc-André Lureau" <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>,
"Max Reitz" <mreitz@redhat.com>,
vgoyal@redhat.com
Subject: Re: virtiofsd: Where should it live?
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2019 08:43:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o8wofsda.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191203111949.GB267814@redhat.com> ("Daniel P. =?utf-8?Q?Be?= =?utf-8?Q?rrang=C3=A9=22's?= message of "Tue, 3 Dec 2019 11:19:49 +0000")
Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes:
> On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 11:06:44AM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 at 10:53, Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > We seem to be coming to the conclusion something that:
>> >
>> > a) It should live in the qemu tree
>> > b) It shouldn't live under contrib
>> > c) We'll create a new top level, i.e. 'daemons'
>> > d) virtiofsd will be daemons/virtiofsd
>> >
>> > Now, somethings I'm less clear on:
>> > e) What else would move into daemons? It was suggested
>> > that if we've got virtiofsd in there, then we should move
>> > libvhost-user - which I understand, but then it's not a
>> > 'daemons'.
>> > Are there any otehr daemons that should move?
>>
>> I like the idea of a new top level directory, but I think
>> 'daemons' is a bit too specific -- for instance it seems to
>> me that qemu-img would be sensible to move out of the root,
>> and that's not a daemon.
>
> Do we really need an extra directory level ?
+1
> IIUC, the main point against having $GIT_ROOT/virtiofsd is that
> the root of our repo is quite cluttered already.
>
> Rather than trying to create a multi-level hierarchy which adds
> a debate around naming, why not address the clutter by moving
> *ALL* the .c/.h files out of the root so that we have a flatter
> tree:
>
> $GITROOT
> +- qemu-system
> | +- vl.c
> | +- ...most other files...
Sounds good to me.
> +- qemu-img
> | +- qemu-img.c
Perhaps this one can all go into existing block/, similar to how
pr-manager-helper.c is in scsi/, and virtfs-proxy-helper.c is in fsdev/.
Up to the block maintainers, of course.
> +- qemu-nbd
> | +- qemu-nbd.c
block/ or nbd/?
> +- qemu-io
> | +- qemu-io.c
> | +- qemu-io-cmds.c
block/?
> +- qemu-bridge-helper
net/?
> | ...
> +- qemu-edid
Has its own MAINTAINERS section, together with hw/display/edit* and
include/hw/display/edid.h. I'm not sure moving it hw/display/ is a good
idea. Gerd?
> +- qemu-keymap
Not covered by MAINTAINERS. scripts/get_maintainer.pl --git-blame
points to Gerd.
> +- qga (already exists)
Yes.
> Then we can add virtiofsd and other programs at the root with no big
> issue.
We don't *have* to put each program into its own directory. Simple ones
could also share one. We just need a directory name.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-04 8:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-25 18:50 virtiofsd: Where should it live? Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2019-11-26 9:02 ` Marc-André Lureau
2019-11-26 11:42 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2019-11-26 10:26 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-11-26 12:14 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2019-12-02 10:12 ` Peter Maydell
2019-12-02 12:56 ` Markus Armbruster
2019-12-02 13:32 ` Thomas Huth
2019-12-02 15:39 ` Markus Armbruster
2019-12-02 15:55 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2019-12-03 10:53 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2019-12-03 11:06 ` Peter Maydell
2019-12-03 11:17 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2019-12-03 11:19 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-12-03 13:06 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2019-12-04 7:43 ` Markus Armbruster [this message]
2019-12-04 8:17 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2019-12-04 13:28 ` Kevin Wolf
2019-12-04 13:29 ` Thomas Huth
2019-12-04 14:36 ` Eric Blake
2019-12-04 16:33 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2019-12-04 12:04 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2019-12-04 13:10 ` Markus Armbruster
2019-12-04 14:34 ` Eric Blake
2019-12-03 12:59 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-12-03 13:02 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2019-12-03 13:07 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-12-03 13:10 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2019-12-03 16:08 ` Greg Kurz
2019-12-02 9:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-12-02 16:44 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2019-12-02 16:52 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-12-02 17:01 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2019-12-02 17:16 ` Christophe de Dinechin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87o8wofsda.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org \
--to=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=mszeredi@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).