qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: qemu-arm <qemu-arm@nongnu.org>,
	Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/4] hw/arm/boot: Avoid placing the initrd on top of the kernel
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 12:59:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFEAcA_i_0=xAp86RJVSpurAdWfT5KDfgoh6Y51-mwBJa=_QTQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190719164729.GA22520@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com>

On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 at 17:47, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> I've just been testing on QEMU v4.1.0-rc1, and found a case where the
> DTB overlapped the end of the kernel, and I think there's a bug in this
> patch -- explanation below.
>
> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 03:47:32PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > We currently put the initrd at the smaller of:
> >  * 128MB into RAM
> >  * halfway into the RAM
> > (with the dtb following it).
> >
> > However for large kernels this might mean that the kernel
> > overlaps the initrd. For some kinds of kernel (self-decompressing
> > 32-bit kernels, and ELF images with a BSS section at the end)
> > we don't know the exact size, but even there we have a
> > minimum size. Put the initrd at least further into RAM than
> > that. For image formats that can give us an exact kernel size, this
> > will mean that we definitely avoid overlaying kernel and initrd.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  hw/arm/boot.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> >  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/arm/boot.c b/hw/arm/boot.c
> > index 935be3b92a5..e441393fdf5 100644
> > --- a/hw/arm/boot.c
> > +++ b/hw/arm/boot.c
> > @@ -999,20 +999,6 @@ static void arm_setup_direct_kernel_boot(ARMCPU *cpu,
> >      if (info->nb_cpus == 0)
> >          info->nb_cpus = 1;
> >
> > -    /*
> > -     * We want to put the initrd far enough into RAM that when the
> > -     * kernel is uncompressed it will not clobber the initrd. However
> > -     * on boards without much RAM we must ensure that we still leave
> > -     * enough room for a decent sized initrd, and on boards with large
> > -     * amounts of RAM we must avoid the initrd being so far up in RAM
> > -     * that it is outside lowmem and inaccessible to the kernel.
> > -     * So for boards with less  than 256MB of RAM we put the initrd
> > -     * halfway into RAM, and for boards with 256MB of RAM or more we put
> > -     * the initrd at 128MB.
> > -     */
> > -    info->initrd_start = info->loader_start +
> > -        MIN(info->ram_size / 2, 128 * 1024 * 1024);
> > -
> >      /* Assume that raw images are linux kernels, and ELF images are not.  */
> >      kernel_size = arm_load_elf(info, &elf_entry, &elf_low_addr,
> >                                 &elf_high_addr, elf_machine, as);
> > @@ -1064,6 +1050,26 @@ static void arm_setup_direct_kernel_boot(ARMCPU *cpu,
> >      }
> >
> >      info->entry = entry;
>
> Note: this is the start of the kernel image...

It's the entry point, which isn't quite the same thing as
the start of the image (if we just loaded an ELF file then
'entry' is whatever the ELF file said the entrypoint is, which
could be a long way into the image).

> > +
> > +    /*
> > +     * We want to put the initrd far enough into RAM that when the
> > +     * kernel is uncompressed it will not clobber the initrd. However
> > +     * on boards without much RAM we must ensure that we still leave
> > +     * enough room for a decent sized initrd, and on boards with large
> > +     * amounts of RAM we must avoid the initrd being so far up in RAM
> > +     * that it is outside lowmem and inaccessible to the kernel.
> > +     * So for boards with less  than 256MB of RAM we put the initrd
> > +     * halfway into RAM, and for boards with 256MB of RAM or more we put
> > +     * the initrd at 128MB.
> > +     * We also refuse to put the initrd somewhere that will definitely
> > +     * overlay the kernel we just loaded, though for kernel formats which
> > +     * don't tell us their exact size (eg self-decompressing 32-bit kernels)
> > +     * we might still make a bad choice here.
> > +     */
> > +    info->initrd_start = info->loader_start +
> > +        MAX(MIN(info->ram_size / 2, 128 * 1024 * 1024), kernel_size);
>
> ... but here we add kernel_size to the start of the loader, which is
> below the kernel. Should that be info->entry?

loader_start here really means "base of RAM". I think what
we want here is something like

  info->initrd_start = info->loader_start + MIN(info->ram_size / 2,
128 * 1024 * 1024);
  info->initrd_start = MAX(info->initrd_start, kernel_end);

where kernel_end is just past whatever the highest addr of the kernel
is, which is not something that's totally trivial to calculate
with the variables we have to hand at this point.

thanks
-- PMM


  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-22 11:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-16 14:47 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] hw/arm/boot: handle large Images more gracefully Peter Maydell
2019-05-16 14:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/4] hw/arm/boot: Don't assume RAM starts at address zero Peter Maydell
2019-06-13 12:44   ` Alex Bennée
2019-05-16 14:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] hw/arm/boot: Diagnose layouts that put initrd or DTB off the end of RAM Peter Maydell
2019-06-13 12:47   ` Alex Bennée
2019-05-16 14:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/4] hw/arm/boot: Avoid placing the initrd on top of the kernel Peter Maydell
2019-06-13 12:53   ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-arm] " Alex Bennée
2019-07-19 16:47   ` [Qemu-devel] " Mark Rutland
2019-07-22 11:59     ` Peter Maydell [this message]
2019-07-22 12:56       ` Mark Rutland
2019-05-16 14:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/4] hw/arm/boot: Honour image size field in AArch64 Image format kernels Peter Maydell
2019-06-13 12:55   ` Alex Bennée
2019-06-07 13:07 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] hw/arm/boot: handle large Images more gracefully Peter Maydell
2019-06-07 14:12   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-06-07 14:07 ` Mark Rutland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAFEAcA_i_0=xAp86RJVSpurAdWfT5KDfgoh6Y51-mwBJa=_QTQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).