On Thursday, November 28, 2019, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> wrote:
On 11/28/19 2:46 PM, Michael Rolnik wrote:
I will rename them.


Renaming alone won't solve anything.
 
Please wait comments from Richard before a version respin.

On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 3:41 PM Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.m.mail@gmail.com <mailto:aleksandar.m.mail@gmail.com>> wrote:
[...]


        If I understand Aleksandar correctly, the naming is incorrect
        because too generic to AVR family, why Sarah only modeled the
        Atmel implementation.

        Renaming devices such hw/char/avr_usart.c ->
        hw/char/atmel_usart.c (similarly with the macros) would be
        enough Aleksandar?



    Some renaming could help, perhaps not quite like the one above, but
    my point (which I find hard to believe I can't explain to you) is
    that peripherals inside the chip evolved over time, as starkly
    opposed to external peripherals that are set in stone...