Re: [PATCH 2/7] virtiofsd: Get rid of unreachable code in read

["Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>]

* Vivek Goyal (vgoyal@redhat.com) wrote:
> pvreadv() can return following.
> 
> - error
> - 0 in case of EOF
> - short read
> 
> We seem to handle all the cases already. We are retrying read in case
> of short read. So another check for short read seems like dead code.
> Get rid of it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>

> ---
>  tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c | 5 -----
>  1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c b/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c
> index 32914f7e95..5dcd08fccb 100644
> --- a/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c
> +++ b/tools/virtiofsd/fuse_virtio.c
> @@ -446,11 +446,6 @@ int virtio_send_data_iov(struct fuse_session *se, struct fuse_chan *ch,
>                       in_sg_left);
>              break;
>          }
> -        if (ret != len) {
> -            fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_DEBUG, "%s: ret!=len\n", __func__);
> -            ret = EIO;
> -            goto err;
> -        }
>          in_sg_left -= ret;
>          len -= ret;
>      } while (in_sg_left);
> -- 
> 2.25.4
> 
-- 
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK