qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
	Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
	Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] [PATCH-for-4.2 v1 3/9] s390x/mmu: DAT translation rewrite
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 13:40:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a8b248fe-9f50-f388-1d44-c1eb6e011748@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190805152947.28536-4-david@redhat.com>

On 8/5/19 5:29 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Let's rewrite the DAT translation in a non-recursive way, similar to
> arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c:guest_translate() in KVM. This makes the
> code much easier to read, compare and maintain.

Ok, I just had another look at this patch, and even if I don't like the
complete rewrite just for the sake of it, the new code looks ok to me.

[...]
> +    switch (asce & ASCE_TYPE_MASK) {
> +    case ASCE_TYPE_REGION1:
> +        if (read_table_entry(gaddr, &entry)) {
> +            return PGM_ADDRESSING;
> +        }
> +        if (entry & REGION_ENTRY_I) {
> +            return PGM_REG_FIRST_TRANS;
> +        }
> +        if ((entry & REGION_ENTRY_TT) != REGION_ENTRY_TT_REGION1) {
> +            return PGM_TRANS_SPEC;
> +        }
> +        if (VADDR_REGION2_TL(vaddr) < (entry & REGION_ENTRY_TF) >> 6 ||
> +            VADDR_REGION2_TL(vaddr) > (entry & REGION_ENTRY_TL)) {
> +            return PGM_REG_SEC_TRANS;
> +        }
> +        if (edat1 && (entry & REGION_ENTRY_P)) {
> +            *flags &= ~PAGE_WRITE;
> +        }
> +        gaddr = (entry & REGION_ENTRY_ORIGIN) + VADDR_REGION2_TX(vaddr) * 8;
> +        /* FALL THROUGH */
> +    case ASCE_TYPE_REGION2:
> +        if (read_table_entry(gaddr, &entry)) {
> +            return PGM_ADDRESSING;
> +        }
> +        if (entry & REGION_ENTRY_I) {
> +            return PGM_REG_SEC_TRANS;
> +        }
> +        if ((entry & REGION_ENTRY_TT) != REGION_ENTRY_TT_REGION2) {
> +            return PGM_TRANS_SPEC;
> +        }
> +        if (VADDR_REGION3_TL(vaddr) < (entry & REGION_ENTRY_TF) >> 6 ||
> +            VADDR_REGION3_TL(vaddr) > (entry & REGION_ENTRY_TL)) {
> +            return PGM_REG_THIRD_TRANS;
> +        }
> +        if (edat1 && (entry & REGION_ENTRY_P)) {
> +            *flags &= ~PAGE_WRITE;
> +        }
> +        gaddr = (entry & REGION_ENTRY_ORIGIN) + VADDR_REGION3_TX(vaddr) * 8;
> +        /* FALL THROUGH */
> +    case ASCE_TYPE_REGION3:
> +        if (read_table_entry(gaddr, &entry)) {
> +            return PGM_ADDRESSING;
> +        }
> +        if (entry & REGION_ENTRY_I) {
> +            return PGM_REG_THIRD_TRANS;
> +        }
> +        if ((entry & REGION_ENTRY_TT) != REGION_ENTRY_TT_REGION3) {
> +            return PGM_TRANS_SPEC;
> +        }
> +        if (edat1 && (entry & REGION_ENTRY_P)) {
> +            *flags &= ~PAGE_WRITE;
> +        }
> +        if (VADDR_SEGMENT_TL(vaddr) < (entry & REGION_ENTRY_TF) >> 6 ||
> +            VADDR_SEGMENT_TL(vaddr) > (entry & REGION_ENTRY_TL)) {
> +            return PGM_SEGMENT_TRANS;
> +        }
> +        gaddr = (entry & REGION_ENTRY_ORIGIN) + VADDR_SEGMENT_TX(vaddr) * 8;
> +        /* FALL THROUGH */

If you don't like recursion, maybe you could at least use a for-loop for
the region tables? ... the code is really quite repetitive here... just
my 0.02 €.

 Thomas


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-08-19 11:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-05 15:29 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH-for-4.2 v1 0/9] s390x: MMU changes and extensions David Hildenbrand
2019-08-05 15:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH-for-4.2 v1 1/9] s390x/mmu: Better ASC selection in s390_cpu_get_phys_page_debug() David Hildenbrand
2019-08-08 12:57   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-08-08 13:02     ` David Hildenbrand
2019-08-12  7:12   ` Thomas Huth
2019-08-12  7:52     ` David Hildenbrand
2019-08-12 13:40       ` Cornelia Huck
2019-08-12 13:45         ` David Hildenbrand
2019-08-12 13:58           ` Cornelia Huck
2019-08-12 14:14             ` David Hildenbrand
2019-08-05 15:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH-for-4.2 v1 2/9] s390x/tcg: Rework MMU selection for instruction fetches David Hildenbrand
2019-08-05 15:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH-for-4.2 v1 3/9] s390x/mmu: DAT translation rewrite David Hildenbrand
2019-08-12  7:20   ` Thomas Huth
2019-08-12  7:43     ` David Hildenbrand
2019-08-12  8:04       ` David Hildenbrand
2019-08-19 11:40   ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2019-08-19 11:58     ` [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] " David Hildenbrand
2019-08-19 12:00       ` Thomas Huth
2019-08-05 15:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH-for-4.2 v1 4/9] s390x/mmu: Add EDAT2 translation support David Hildenbrand
2019-08-19 12:01   ` [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] " Thomas Huth
2019-08-05 15:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH-for-4.2 v1 5/9] s390x/mmu: Implement access-exception-fetch/store-indication facility David Hildenbrand
2019-08-19 12:16   ` [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] " Thomas Huth
2019-08-19 12:22     ` Thomas Huth
2019-08-19 12:26       ` David Hildenbrand
2019-08-19 12:30         ` Thomas Huth
2019-08-19 12:35           ` David Hildenbrand
2019-08-05 15:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH-for-4.2 v1 6/9] s390x/mmu: Implement enhanced suppression-on-protection facility 2 David Hildenbrand
2019-08-19 14:58   ` [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] " Thomas Huth
2019-08-05 15:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH-for-4.2 v1 7/9] s390x/mmu: Implement Instruction-Execution-Protection Facility David Hildenbrand
2019-08-19 15:03   ` [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] " Thomas Huth
2019-08-05 15:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH-for-4.2 v1 8/9] s390x/cpumodel: Prepare for changes of QEMU model David Hildenbrand
2019-08-13 16:02   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-08-19 15:07   ` [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] " Thomas Huth
2019-08-05 15:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH-for-4.2 v1 9/9] s390x/cpumodel: Add new TCG features to QEMU cpu model David Hildenbrand
2019-08-13 16:07   ` Cornelia Huck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a8b248fe-9f50-f388-1d44-c1eb6e011748@redhat.com \
    --to=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).