From: Claudio Fontana <cfontana@suse.de>
To: "Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>,
"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Cc: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
Roman Bolshakov <r.bolshakov@yadro.com>,
Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 18/22] accel: introduce AccelCPUClass extending CPUClass
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2021 11:53:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aaafff05-f3c6-ef44-2d98-f6fcb74ccf64@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0943e736-6847-4b6a-8433-f28f4692a299@linaro.org>
On 1/29/21 1:13 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 1/28/21 6:29 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> On 1/28/21 5:08 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>>
>>> Claudio Fontana <cfontana@suse.de> writes:
>>>
>>>> On 1/28/21 2:03 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>>>> On 1/28/21 10:28 AM, Claudio Fontana wrote:
>>> <snip>
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +#define TYPE_ACCEL_CPU "accel-" CPU_RESOLVING_TYPE
>>>>>> +#define ACCEL_CPU_NAME(name) (name "-" TYPE_ACCEL_CPU)
>>>>>> +typedef struct AccelCPUClass AccelCPUClass;
>>>>>> +DECLARE_CLASS_CHECKERS(AccelCPUClass, ACCEL_CPU, TYPE_ACCEL_CPU)
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +typedef struct AccelCPUClass {
>>>>>> + /*< private >*/
>>>>>> + ObjectClass parent_class;
>>>>>> + /*< public >*/
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + void (*cpu_class_init)(CPUClass *cc);
>>>>>> + void (*cpu_instance_init)(CPUState *cpu);
>>>>>> + void (*cpu_realizefn)(CPUState *cpu, Error **errp);
>>>>>
>>>>> If we want callers to check errp, better have the prototype return
>>>>> a boolean.
>>>>
>>>> Good point, the whole errp thing is worth revisiting in the series,
>>>> there are many cases (which are basically reproduced in the refactoring from existing code),
>>>> where errp is passed but is really unused.
>>>>
>>>> I am constantly internally debating whether to remove the parameter altogether, or to keep it in there.
>>>>
>>>> What would you suggest?
>>>
>>> I think it really depends on if we can expect the realizefn to usefully
>>> return an error message that can be read and understood by the user. I
>>> guess this comes down to how much user config is going to be checked at
>>> the point we realize the CPU?
>>
>> cpu_realize() is were various feature checks are, isn't it?
>>
>> -cpu mycpu,feat1=on,feat2=off
>> CPU 'mycpu' can not disable feature 'feat2' because of REASON.
>
> Yes. And while changing the return type of realize is probably a good idea, it
> should be a separate patch.
>
>
> r~
>
To summarize:
1) accel->cpu_realizefn extends the current cpu target-specific realize functions with accelerator-specific code,
which currently does not make use of errp at all (thus, the temptation to remove errp from the interface until it is actually needed by a target).
2) Regarding the target-specific cpu realize functions themselves, registered with the pattern:
device_class_set_parent_realize(dc, x86_cpu_realizefn, &xcc->parent_realize);
device_class_set_parent_realize(dc, arm_cpu_realizefn, &acc->parent_realize);
... etc ...
these currently all return void, and the code that realizes devices (f.e. in hw/core/qdev.c)
calls these callbacks like this:
static void device_set_realized(...)
{
...
if (dc->realize) {
dc->realize(dev, &local_err);
if (local_err != NULL) {
goto fail;
}
}
Ie it does not expect a bool return type for realize().
So making realize return bool means changing all the realize functions for all devices in my view,
which I don't think should be crammed in here..
Wdty?
Thanks,
Claudio
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-30 10:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-28 9:27 [PATCH v14 00/22] i386 cleanup PART 2 Claudio Fontana
2021-01-28 9:27 ` [PATCH v14 01/22] cpu: Introduce TCGCpuOperations struct Claudio Fontana
2021-01-28 9:27 ` [PATCH v14 02/22] target/riscv: remove CONFIG_TCG, as it is always TCG Claudio Fontana
2021-01-28 18:34 ` Alex Bennée
2021-01-28 9:27 ` [PATCH v14 03/22] accel/tcg: split TCG-only code from cpu_exec_realizefn Claudio Fontana
2021-01-28 9:27 ` [PATCH v14 04/22] cpu: Move synchronize_from_tb() to tcg_ops Claudio Fontana
2021-01-28 18:58 ` Alex Bennée
2021-01-28 23:01 ` Richard Henderson
2021-01-28 9:27 ` [PATCH v14 05/22] cpu: Move cpu_exec_* " Claudio Fontana
2021-01-28 9:27 ` [PATCH v14 06/22] cpu: Move tlb_fill " Claudio Fontana
2021-01-28 9:27 ` [PATCH v14 07/22] cpu: Move debug_excp_handler " Claudio Fontana
2021-01-28 9:28 ` [PATCH v14 08/22] target/arm: do not use cc->do_interrupt for KVM directly Claudio Fontana
2021-01-28 9:28 ` [PATCH v14 09/22] cpu: move cc->do_interrupt to tcg_ops Claudio Fontana
2021-01-28 9:28 ` [PATCH v14 10/22] cpu: move cc->transaction_failed " Claudio Fontana
2021-01-28 9:28 ` [PATCH v14 11/22] cpu: move do_unaligned_access " Claudio Fontana
2021-01-28 9:28 ` [PATCH v14 12/22] physmem: make watchpoint checking code TCG-only Claudio Fontana
2021-01-28 19:09 ` Alex Bennée
2021-01-28 9:28 ` [PATCH v14 13/22] cpu: move adjust_watchpoint_address to tcg_ops Claudio Fontana
2021-01-28 9:28 ` [PATCH v14 14/22] cpu: move debug_check_watchpoint " Claudio Fontana
2021-01-28 9:28 ` [PATCH v14 15/22] cpu: tcg_ops: move to tcg-cpu-ops.h, keep a pointer in CPUClass Claudio Fontana
2021-01-29 0:31 ` Richard Henderson
2021-01-29 9:00 ` Claudio Fontana
2021-01-29 19:19 ` Richard Henderson
2021-01-29 19:36 ` Eduardo Habkost
2021-01-30 9:40 ` Claudio Fontana
2021-02-02 10:01 ` Claudio Fontana
2021-02-02 10:27 ` Claudio Fontana
2021-01-28 9:28 ` [PATCH v14 16/22] accel: extend AccelState and AccelClass to user-mode Claudio Fontana
2021-01-28 9:28 ` [PATCH v14 17/22] accel: replace struct CpusAccel with AccelOpsClass Claudio Fontana
2021-01-28 9:28 ` [PATCH v14 18/22] accel: introduce AccelCPUClass extending CPUClass Claudio Fontana
2021-01-28 13:03 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-01-28 13:22 ` Claudio Fontana
2021-01-28 16:08 ` Alex Bennée
2021-01-28 16:29 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-01-29 0:13 ` Richard Henderson
2021-01-30 10:53 ` Claudio Fontana [this message]
2021-01-30 19:01 ` Richard Henderson
2021-02-01 9:15 ` Alex Bennée
2021-02-01 9:22 ` Claudio Fontana
2021-01-28 9:28 ` [PATCH v14 19/22] i386: split cpu accelerators from cpu.c, using AccelCPUClass Claudio Fontana
2021-01-28 9:28 ` [PATCH v14 20/22] cpu: call AccelCPUClass::cpu_realizefn in cpu_exec_realizefn Claudio Fontana
2021-01-28 9:28 ` [PATCH v14 21/22] hw/core/cpu: call qemu_init_vcpu in cpu_common_realizefn Claudio Fontana
2021-01-28 9:28 ` [PATCH v14 22/22] accel: introduce new accessor functions Claudio Fontana
2021-01-29 0:22 ` [PATCH v14 00/22] i386 cleanup PART 2 Richard Henderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aaafff05-f3c6-ef44-2d98-f6fcb74ccf64@suse.de \
--to=cfontana@suse.de \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=alistair.francis@wdc.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=r.bolshakov@yadro.com \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).