qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
To: Roman Kagan <rvkagan@yandex-team.ru>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: yc-core@yandex-team.ru, Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>,
	Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] block/nbd: avoid touching freed connect_thread
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 18:40:12 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b551f5f1-fc80-db3c-57a8-627195048bf4@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210315060611.2989049-2-rvkagan@yandex-team.ru>

15.03.2021 09:06, Roman Kagan wrote:
> When the NBD connection is being torn down, the connection thread gets
> canceled and "detached", meaning it is about to get freed.
> 
> If this happens while the connection coroutine yielded waiting for the
> connection thread to complete, when it resumes it may access the
> invalidated connection thread data.
> 
> To prevent this, revalidate the ->connect_thread pointer in
> nbd_co_establish_connection_cancel before using after the the yield.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roman Kagan <rvkagan@yandex-team.ru>

Seems possible. Do you have a reproducer? Would be great to make an iotest.

> ---
>   block/nbd.c | 9 +++++++++
>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/block/nbd.c b/block/nbd.c
> index c26dc5a54f..447d176b76 100644
> --- a/block/nbd.c
> +++ b/block/nbd.c
> @@ -486,6 +486,15 @@ nbd_co_establish_connection(BlockDriverState *bs, Error **errp)
>       s->wait_connect = true;
>       qemu_coroutine_yield();
>   
> +    /*
> +     * If nbd_co_establish_connection_cancel had a chance to run it may have
> +     * invalidated ->connect_thread.
> +     */
> +    thr = s->connect_thread;
> +    if (!thr) {
> +        return -ECONNABORTED;
> +    }
> +
>       qemu_mutex_lock(&thr->mutex);
>   
>       switch (thr->state) {
> 

Patch looks a bit like s->connect_thread may become something other than NULL during the yield.. But it can't actually. Maybe it will be possible with further patches?

Anyway, make sense to me:

Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>


-- 
Best regards,
Vladimir


  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-15 15:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-15  6:06 [PATCH 0/7] block/nbd: decouple reconnect from drain Roman Kagan
2021-03-15  6:06 ` [PATCH 1/7] block/nbd: avoid touching freed connect_thread Roman Kagan
2021-03-15 15:40   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy [this message]
2021-03-16 15:29     ` Roman Kagan
2021-04-06 16:21   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-03-15  6:06 ` [PATCH 2/7] block/nbd: use uniformly nbd_client_connecting_wait Roman Kagan
2021-03-15 15:48   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-03-15  6:06 ` [PATCH 3/7] block/nbd: assert attach/detach runs in the proper context Roman Kagan
2021-03-15 16:41   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-03-15 19:57     ` Roman Kagan
2021-03-15  6:06 ` [PATCH 4/7] block/nbd: transfer reconnection stuff across aio_context switch Roman Kagan
2021-03-15  6:06 ` [PATCH 5/7] block/nbd: better document a case in nbd_co_establish_connection Roman Kagan
2021-03-15  6:06 ` [PATCH 6/7] block/nbd: decouple reconnect from drain Roman Kagan
2021-03-15 20:10   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-03-16 16:03     ` Roman Kagan
2021-03-16 18:09       ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-03-26  6:16         ` Roman Kagan
2021-03-15  6:06 ` [PATCH 7/7] block/nbd: stop manipulating in_flight counter Roman Kagan
2021-03-15 20:15   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-03-16 16:08     ` Roman Kagan
2021-03-16 18:37       ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-03-26  7:41         ` Roman Kagan
2021-03-15 19:45 ` [PATCH 0/7] block/nbd: decouple reconnect from drain Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-03-16 15:52   ` Roman Kagan
2021-03-16 14:41 ` Eric Blake
2021-03-16 16:10   ` Roman Kagan
2021-03-17  8:35 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-03-26  8:07   ` Roman Kagan
2021-04-07  7:45   ` Roman Kagan
2021-04-07 10:13     ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b551f5f1-fc80-db3c-57a8-627195048bf4@virtuozzo.com \
    --to=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rvkagan@yandex-team.ru \
    --cc=yc-core@yandex-team.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).