From: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-trivial@nongnu.org,
Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>, Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>,
Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH-for-4.1 3/7] hw/block/pflash_cfi02: Rewrite a fall through comment
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 20:27:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bc3dc756-23a8-48a3-02ca-abaae6d0db96@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6ff431d9-36bd-27a1-077b-b2cb1331750d@redhat.com>
On 7/22/19 7:43 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 7/19/19 3:14 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> GCC9 is confused by this comment when building with CFLAG
>> -Wimplicit-fallthrough=2:
>>
>> hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c: In function ‘pflash_write’:
>> hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c:574:16: error: this statement may fall through [-Werror=implicit-fallthrough=]
>> 574 | if (boff == 0x55 && cmd == 0x98) {
>> | ^
>> hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c:581:9: note: here
>> 581 | default:
>> | ^~~~~~~
>> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
>>
>> Rewrite the comment using 'fall through' which is recognized by
>> GCC and static analyzers.
>>
>> Reported-by: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c b/hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c
>> index f68837a449..42886f6af5 100644
>> --- a/hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c
>> +++ b/hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c
>> @@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ static void pflash_write(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, uint64_t value,
>> pfl->cmd = 0x98;
>> return;
>> }
>> - /* No break here */
>> + /* fall through */
>> default:
>> DPRINTF("%s: invalid write for command %02x\n",
>> __func__, pfl->cmd);
>>
>
> Queued to pflash/next, thanks.
>
Are you queueing everything or just this one patch? It would be a little
inconvenient to split a series up like that.
(Most other maintainers will, I believe, expect that with an "ACK" or
similar that someone else will stage the series.)
--js
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-25 0:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-19 13:14 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH-for-4.1? 0/7] Trivial switch 'fall through' comment fixes for GCC9 Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-07-19 13:14 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH-for-4.1? 1/7] json: Move switch 'fall through' comment to correct place Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-07-19 15:31 ` Eric Blake
2019-08-21 8:54 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-trivial] " Laurent Vivier
2019-07-19 13:14 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH-for-4.1? 2/7] hw/dma/omap_dma: " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-07-19 13:27 ` Peter Maydell
2019-08-21 8:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-trivial] " Laurent Vivier
2019-07-19 13:14 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH-for-4.1 3/7] hw/block/pflash_cfi02: Rewrite a fall through comment Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-07-19 13:27 ` Peter Maydell
2019-07-22 11:43 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-07-25 0:27 ` John Snow [this message]
2019-07-25 10:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-07-19 13:14 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH-for-4.1? 4/7] hw/ipmi: " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-07-21 2:10 ` Corey Minyard
2019-08-21 8:56 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-trivial] " Laurent Vivier
2019-07-19 13:14 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH-for-4.1? 5/7] target/ppc: " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-07-19 14:20 ` David Gibson
2019-08-21 8:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-trivial] " Laurent Vivier
2019-07-19 13:14 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH-for-4.1? 6/7] vl: " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-07-25 0:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " John Snow
2019-08-21 8:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-trivial] " Laurent Vivier
2019-07-19 13:14 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH-for-4.1? 7/7] spapr_events: " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-07-19 14:20 ` David Gibson
2019-08-21 8:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-trivial] " Laurent Vivier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bc3dc756-23a8-48a3-02ca-abaae6d0db96@redhat.com \
--to=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=laurent@vivier.eu \
--cc=minyard@acm.org \
--cc=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-trivial@nongnu.org \
--cc=sw@weilnetz.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).