qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com,
	Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>,
	Alberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] qcow2: Avoid feature name extension on small cluster size
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 13:42:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d28f2dfc-1f85-1157-0a57-341894205883@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200324174233.1622067-4-eblake@redhat.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2460 bytes --]

On 24.03.20 18:42, Eric Blake wrote:
> As the feature name table can be quite large (over 9k if all 64 bits
> of all three feature fields have names; a mere 8 features leaves only
> 8 bytes for a backing file name in a 512-byte cluster), it is unwise
> to emit this optional header in images with small cluster sizes.
> 
> Update iotest 036 to skip running on small cluster sizes; meanwhile,
> note that iotest 061 never passed on alternative cluster sizes
> (however, I limited this patch to tests with output affected by adding
> feature names, rather than auditing for other tests that are not
> robust to alternative cluster sizes).

That’s a bit more brave than necessary, considering I don’t think anyone
has ever run the iotests with the cluster_size option.  (I certainly
don’t, and I don’t plan to, because I don’t think it’s that important to
test that.)  There are certainly many other iotests that fail with a
non-default cluster size.

Not that it’s wrong care about it.  On the opposite, I’m happy you do. :)

> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
> Reviewed-by: Alberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com>
> ---
>  block/qcow2.c          | 11 +++++++++--
>  tests/qemu-iotests/036 |  6 ++++--
>  tests/qemu-iotests/061 |  6 ++++--
>  3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/qcow2.c b/block/qcow2.c
> index 67b0c214fba4..9475ace57163 100644
> --- a/block/qcow2.c
> +++ b/block/qcow2.c
> @@ -2823,8 +2823,15 @@ int qcow2_update_header(BlockDriverState *bs)
>          buflen -= ret;
>      }
> 
> -    /* Feature table */
> -    if (s->qcow_version >= 3) {
> +    /*
> +     * Feature table.  A mere 8 feature names occupies 392 bytes, and
> +     * when coupled with the v3 minimum header of 104 bytes plus the
> +     * 8-byte end-of-extension marker, that would leave only 8 bytes
> +     * for a backing file name in an image with 512-byte clusters.
> +     * Thus, we choose to omit this header for cluster sizes 4k and
> +     * smaller.

Can’t we do this decision more dynamically?  Like, always omit it when
cluster_size - sizeof(features) < 2k/3k/...?

Max

> +     */
> +    if (s->qcow_version >= 3 && s->cluster_size > 4096) {
>          static const Qcow2Feature features[] = {
>              {
>                  .type = QCOW2_FEAT_TYPE_INCOMPATIBLE,


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-25 12:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-24 17:42 [PATCH for-5.0 v2 0/4] bug fixes extracted from larger qcow2 zero bit work Eric Blake
2020-03-24 17:42 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] qcow2: Comment typo fixes Eric Blake
2020-03-24 17:42 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] qcow2: List autoclear bit names in header Eric Blake
2020-03-24 17:42 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] qcow2: Avoid feature name extension on small cluster size Eric Blake
2020-03-25 12:42   ` Max Reitz [this message]
2020-03-25 13:18     ` Eric Blake
2020-03-25 13:52       ` Max Reitz
2020-03-25 14:01         ` Eric Blake
2020-03-24 17:42 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] sheepdog: Consistently set bdrv_has_zero_init_truncate Eric Blake
2020-03-24 19:33   ` John Snow
2020-03-25 14:45   ` [PATCH-for-5.0 " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-03-26 13:32 ` [PATCH for-5.0 v2 0/4] bug fixes extracted from larger qcow2 zero bit work Max Reitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d28f2dfc-1f85-1157-0a57-341894205883@redhat.com \
    --to=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=berto@igalia.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).