From: Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>
To: "wangyanan (Y)" <wangyanan55@huawei.com>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"linuxarm@openeuler.org" <linuxarm@openeuler.org>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com>,
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
"qemu-arm@nongnu.org" <qemu-arm@nongnu.org>,
Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>,
"Zengtao \(B\)" <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>,
yangyicong <yangyicong@huawei.com>,
yuzenghui <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
"Wanghaibin \(D\)" <wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com>,
zhukeqian <zhukeqian1@huawei.com>,
"lijiajie \(H\)" <lijiajie11@huawei.com>,
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH v2 5/6] hw/arm/virt-acpi-build: Add PPTT table
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 07:54:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f766805215ac439bb988dab02247ec71@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <224d54ac-0c03-afc4-4aec-ea3435aa68e7@huawei.com>
> From: wangyanan (Y)
> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2021 4:18 AM
>
>
> On 2021/5/19 3:22, Salil Mehta wrote:
> >> From: Andrew Jones [mailto:drjones@redhat.com]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2021 8:06 PM
> >> To: Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>
> >> Cc: wangyanan (Y) <wangyanan55@huawei.com>; Peter Maydell
> >> <peter.maydell@linaro.org>; Michael S . Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>; Wanghaibin
> >> (D) <wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com>; qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Shannon Zhao
> >> <shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com>; qemu-arm@nongnu.org; Alistair Francis
> >> <alistair.francis@wdc.com>; Zengtao (B) <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>;
> >> yangyicong <yangyicong@huawei.com>; yuzenghui <yuzenghui@huawei.com>; Igor
> >> Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>; zhukeqian <zhukeqian1@huawei.com>; lijiajie
> (H)
> >> <lijiajie11@huawei.com>; David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>;
> Linuxarm
> >> <linuxarm@huawei.com>; linuxarm@openeuler.org
> >> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 5/6] hw/arm/virt-acpi-build: Add PPTT table
> >>
> >> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 06:34:08PM +0000, Salil Mehta wrote:
> >>> Those benefits, when vcpu pinning is used, are the same benefits
> >>>> as for the host, which already use PPTT tables to describe topology, even
> >>>> though hot plug isn't supported.
> >>> yes sure, you mean pinning vcpus according to the cpu topology for performance?
> >> Yup
> > Already Agreed :)
> >
> >>>> Now, if you're saying we should only generate tables for smp.cpus, not
> >>> Correct. This is what I thought we must be doing even now
> >>>
> >>>> smp.maxcpus, because hot plug isn't supported anyway, then I see your
> >>>> point. But, it'd be better to require smp.cpus == smp.maxcpus in our
> >>>> smp_parse function to do that, which we've never done before, so we may
> >>>> have trouble supporting existing command lines.
> >>> I am trying to recall, if the vcpu Hotplug is not supported then can they
> >>> ever be different?
> >>>
> >>> cpus = (threads * cores * sockets)
> >>>
> >>> static void smp_parse(MachineState *ms, QemuOpts *opts)
> >>> {
> >>> [...]
> >>>
> >>> if (sockets * cores * threads != ms->smp.max_cpus) {
> >>> warn_report("Invalid CPU topology deprecated: "
> >>> "sockets (%u) * cores (%u) * threads (%u) "
> >>> "!= maxcpus (%u)",
> >>> sockets, cores, threads,
> >>> ms->smp.max_cpus);
> >>> }
> >>> [...]
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> Although, above check does not exit(1) and just warns on detecting invalid
> >>> CPU topology. Not sure why?
> >> Hmm, not sure what code you have there. I see this in
> >> hw/core/machine.c:smp_parse
> >>
> >> if (ms->smp.max_cpus < cpus) {
> >> error_report("maxcpus must be equal to or greater than smp");
> >> exit(1);
> >> }
> >>
> >> if (sockets * cores * threads != ms->smp.max_cpus) {
> >> error_report("Invalid CPU topology: "
> >> "sockets (%u) * cores (%u) * threads (%u) "
> >> "!= maxcpus (%u)",
> >> sockets, cores, threads,
> >> ms->smp.max_cpus);
> >> exit(1);
> >> }
> >>
> >>> Well if you think there are subtleties to support above implementation and
> >>> we cannot do it now then sure it is your call. :)
> Hi Salil, Drew,
> >> The problem is that -smp 4,maxcpus=8 doesn't error out today, even though
> >> it doesn't do anything. OTOH, -smp 4,cores=2 doesn't error out either, but
> >> we're proposing that it should. Maybe we can start erroring out when
> >> cpus != maxcpus until hot plug is supported?
> > Agreed, both don't make any sense if hotplug is not supported and ideally should
> > fail with error. We should block any such topology configuration.
> In the ARM-specific function virt_smp_parse() (patch 9), there already
> have been some restrictions for the given -smp configuration.
> We now only allow:
> -smp N
> -smp maxcpus=M
> -smp N, maxcpus=M
>
> -smp N, sockets=X, cores=Y
> -smp N, sockets=X, cores=Y, threads=Z
>
> -smp maxcpus=M, sockets=X, cores=Y
> -smp maxcpus=M, sockets=X, cores=Y, threads=Z
>
> -smp N, maxcpus=M, sockets=X, cores=Y
> -smp N, maxcpus=M, sockets=X, cores=Y, threads=Z
>
> and disallow the other strange and rare formats that shouldn't be provided.
>
> It's reasonable to block the topology configuration which is not useful
> currently. I will add the requirement for "cpus==maxcpus" in this fuction
> if the possible conflict with existing command lines is not a big problem.
Hi Yanan,
Makes sense. I did see your other patch-set in which cluster support has been
added. Are we deferring that too?
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-19 7:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-13 8:07 [RFC PATCH v2 0/6] hw/arm/virt: Introduce cpu topology support Yanan Wang
2021-04-13 8:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/6] device_tree: Add qemu_fdt_add_path Yanan Wang
2021-04-16 4:52 ` David Gibson
2021-04-17 2:36 ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-04-19 1:13 ` David Gibson
2021-04-19 7:02 ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-04-13 8:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/6] hw/arm/virt: DT: Add cpu-map Yanan Wang
2021-04-27 9:47 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-04-27 10:04 ` Andrew Jones
2021-04-27 12:36 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-04-28 6:36 ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-05-13 6:58 ` Andrew Jones
2021-05-13 7:15 ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-04-13 8:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/6] hw/arm/virt-acpi-build: Distinguish possible and present cpus Yanan Wang
2021-04-27 13:18 ` Andrew Jones
2021-04-28 6:42 ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-04-27 14:50 ` Andrew Jones
2021-04-28 6:47 ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-04-13 8:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/6] hw/acpi/aml-build: Add processor hierarchy node structure Yanan Wang
2021-04-27 13:37 ` Andrew Jones
2021-04-28 6:59 ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-04-13 8:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/6] hw/arm/virt-acpi-build: Add PPTT table Yanan Wang
2021-04-27 14:16 ` Andrew Jones
2021-04-28 7:30 ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-05-13 5:10 ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-05-13 6:55 ` Andrew Jones
2021-05-18 7:17 ` Salil Mehta
2021-05-18 7:42 ` Andrew Jones
2021-05-18 18:34 ` Salil Mehta
2021-05-18 19:05 ` Andrew Jones
2021-05-18 19:22 ` Salil Mehta
2021-05-19 3:18 ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-05-19 7:54 ` Salil Mehta [this message]
2021-05-19 8:15 ` Andrew Jones
2021-05-19 8:42 ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-05-19 10:00 ` Salil Mehta
2021-05-19 8:27 ` Andrew Jones
2021-05-19 13:26 ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-05-19 13:40 ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-05-18 9:16 ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-04-13 8:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/6] hw/arm/virt: Replace smp_parse with one that prefers cores Yanan Wang
2021-04-27 14:58 ` Andrew Jones
2021-04-28 8:04 ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-04-28 9:36 ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-04-28 10:13 ` Andrew Jones
2021-04-29 2:21 ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-04-21 7:40 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/6] hw/arm/virt: Introduce cpu topology support wangyanan (Y)
2021-04-21 9:31 ` wangyanan (Y)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f766805215ac439bb988dab02247ec71@huawei.com \
--to=salil.mehta@huawei.com \
--cc=alistair.francis@wdc.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=lijiajie11@huawei.com \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=linuxarm@openeuler.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=prime.zeng@hisilicon.com \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com \
--cc=wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
--cc=yangyicong@huawei.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
--cc=zhukeqian1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).