From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Kevin Wolf" <kwolf@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, "Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
"John Snow" <jsnow@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] RFC crypto/luks: encryption key managment using amend interface
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2019 21:10:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fb2cd2e0-2718-215f-d6af-59b64b229b4f@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190912223028.18496-1-mlevitsk@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1033 bytes --]
On 13.09.19 00:30, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> This patch series is continuation of my work to add encryption
> key managment to luks/qcow2 with luks.
>
> This is second version of this patch set.
> The changes are mostly addressing the review feedback,
> plus I tested (and fixed sadly) the somewhat ugly code
> that allows to still write share a raw luks device,
> while preveting the key managment from happening in this case,
> as it is unsafe.
> I added a new iotest dedicated to that as well.
>
> Best regards,
> Maxim Levitsky
At least for an RFC looks good from my perspective. I didn’t look at
the crypto things very closely (assuming Dan would do so), and I didn’t
check the iotests in detail. (But it definitely doesn’t look like they
lack in breadth. Maybe I’d like to see a test that you cannot have
other useful nodes attached to the LUKS or qcow2 node while the
amendment process is ongoing (because CONSISTENT_READ is unshared). But
that’s the only thing I can think of.)
Max
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-04 19:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-12 22:30 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/11] RFC crypto/luks: encryption key managment using amend interface Maxim Levitsky
2019-09-12 22:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 01/11] qcrypto: add suport for amend options Maxim Levitsky
2019-09-23 13:08 ` Eric Blake
2019-09-23 13:24 ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-09-12 22:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 02/11] qcrypto-luks: extend the create options for upcoming encryption key management Maxim Levitsky
2019-10-04 17:42 ` Max Reitz
2019-11-08 9:28 ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-11-08 10:48 ` Max Reitz
2019-11-08 11:48 ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-10-07 7:49 ` [Qemu-devel] " Markus Armbruster
2019-11-08 9:28 ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-10-10 13:44 ` Kevin Wolf
2019-11-08 10:04 ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-09-12 22:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 03/11] qcrypto-luks: implement the " Maxim Levitsky
2019-09-12 22:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 04/11] block: amend: add 'force' option Maxim Levitsky
2019-09-12 22:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 05/11] block/crypto: implement the encryption key management Maxim Levitsky
2019-10-04 18:41 ` Max Reitz
2019-11-08 9:30 ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-11-08 10:49 ` Max Reitz
2019-11-08 11:04 ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-11-08 13:12 ` Max Reitz
2019-11-08 13:20 ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-09-12 22:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 06/11] qcow2: implement crypto amend options Maxim Levitsky
2019-09-12 22:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 07/11] block: add x-blockdev-amend qmp command Maxim Levitsky
2019-10-04 18:53 ` Max Reitz
2019-11-08 9:26 ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-11-08 10:36 ` Max Reitz
2019-11-08 13:37 ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-11-08 9:27 ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-10-07 7:53 ` [Qemu-devel] " Markus Armbruster
2019-11-08 15:38 ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-09-12 22:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 08/11] block/crypto: implement blockdev-amend Maxim Levitsky
2019-10-07 7:58 ` Markus Armbruster
2019-11-08 15:36 ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-09-12 22:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 09/11] block/qcow2: " Maxim Levitsky
2019-10-04 19:03 ` Max Reitz
2019-10-07 8:04 ` Markus Armbruster
2019-11-08 15:14 ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-11-08 15:18 ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-09-12 22:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 10/11] iotests: filter few more luks specific create options Maxim Levitsky
2019-09-12 22:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 11/11] iotests : add tests for encryption key management Maxim Levitsky
2019-10-04 19:11 ` Max Reitz
2019-11-08 9:28 ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-09-20 21:14 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/11] RFC crypto/luks: encryption key managment using amend interface John Snow
2019-09-22 8:17 ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-10-07 8:05 ` Markus Armbruster
2019-11-06 16:43 ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-09-30 17:11 ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-10-04 19:10 ` Max Reitz [this message]
2019-11-08 15:07 ` Maxim Levitsky
2019-11-12 11:58 ` Max Reitz
2019-11-12 12:07 ` Maxim Levitsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fb2cd2e0-2718-215f-d6af-59b64b229b4f@redhat.com \
--to=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).