rcu.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: paulmck@kernel.org
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, RCU <rcu@vger.kernel.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	"Theodore Y . Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sonymobile.com>,
	mhiramat@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] rcu-tasks: add RCU-tasks self tests
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 23:47:59 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210217234759.b82e39049a2e99cf6358e1c2@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210216173003.GX2743@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>

On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 09:30:03 -0800
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 12:28:26PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > On 2021-02-13 08:45:54 [-0800], Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > Glad you like it!  But let's see which (if any) of these patches solves
> > > the problem for Sebastian.
> > 
> > Looking at that, is there any reason for doing this that can not be
> > solved by moving the self-test a little later? Maybe once we reached at
> > least SYSTEM_SCHEDULING?
> 
> One problem is that ksoftirqd and the kprobes use are early_initcall(),
> so we cannot count on ksoftirqd being spawned when kprobes first uses
> synchronize_rcu_tasks().  Moving the selftest later won't fix this
> problem, but rather just paper it over.
> 
> > This happens now even before lockdep is up or the console is registered.
> > So if something bad happens, you end up with a blank terminal.
> 
> I was getting a splat, but I could easily believe that there are
> configurations where the hang is totally silent.  In other words, I do
> agree that this needs a proper fix.  All we need do is work out an
> agreeable value of "proper".  ;-)
> 
> > There is nothing else that early in the boot process that requires
> > working softirq. The only exception to this is wait_task_inactive()
> > which is used while starting a new thread (including the ksoftirqd)
> > which is why it was moved to schedule_hrtimeout().
> 
> Moving kprobes initialization to early_initcall() [1] means that there
> can be a call to synchronize_rcu_tasks() before the current spawning of
> ksoftirqd.  Because synchronize_rcu_tasks() needs timers to work, it needs
> softirq to work.  I know two straightforward ways to make that happen:
> 
> 1.	Spawn ksoftirqd earlier.
> 
> 2.	Suppress attempts to awaken ksoftirqd before it exists,
> 	forcing all ksoftirq execution on the back of interrupts.
> 
> Uladzislau and I each produced patches for #1, and I produced a patch
> for #2.
> 
> The only other option I know of is to push the call to init_kprobes()
> later in the boot sequence, perhaps to its original subsys_initcall(),
> or maybe only as late as core_initcall().  I added Masami and Steve on
> CC for their thoughts on this.
> 
> Is there some other proper fix that I am missing?

Oh, I missed that the synchronize_rcu_tasks() will be involved the kprobes
in early stage. Does the problem only exist in the synchronize_rcu_tasks()
instead of synchronize_rcu()? If so I can just stop optimizer in early stage
because I just want to enable kprobes in early stage, but not optprobes.

Does the following patch help?

From e5fafcda3ff918cd52619f795a3f22fb95c72b11 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 23:35:20 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] kprobes: Fix to delay the kprobes jump optimization

Since the kprobes jump optimization involves synchronize_rcu_tasks()
which depends on the ksoftirqd, that can not be enabled at the
early_initcall() boot stage. So this makes the kprobe optimization
disabled in the early_initcall() and enables it in subsys_initcall().

Note that non-optimized kprobes is still available after
early_initcall(). Only jump optimization is delayed.

Fixes: 36dadef23fcc ("kprobes: Init kprobes in early_initcall")
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/kprobes.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
index d5a3eb74a657..779d8322e307 100644
--- a/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -861,7 +861,6 @@ static void try_to_optimize_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
 	cpus_read_unlock();
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
 static void optimize_all_kprobes(void)
 {
 	struct hlist_head *head;
@@ -887,6 +886,7 @@ static void optimize_all_kprobes(void)
 	mutex_unlock(&kprobe_mutex);
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
 static void unoptimize_all_kprobes(void)
 {
 	struct hlist_head *head;
@@ -2497,18 +2497,14 @@ static int __init init_kprobes(void)
 		}
 	}
 
-#if defined(CONFIG_OPTPROBES)
-#if defined(__ARCH_WANT_KPROBES_INSN_SLOT)
-	/* Init kprobe_optinsn_slots */
-	kprobe_optinsn_slots.insn_size = MAX_OPTINSN_SIZE;
-#endif
-	/* By default, kprobes can be optimized */
-	kprobes_allow_optimization = true;
-#endif
-
 	/* By default, kprobes are armed */
 	kprobes_all_disarmed = false;
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_OPTPROBES) && defined(__ARCH_WANT_KPROBES_INSN_SLOT)
+	/* Init kprobe_optinsn_slots for allocation */
+	kprobe_optinsn_slots.insn_size = MAX_OPTINSN_SIZE;
+#endif
+
 	err = arch_init_kprobes();
 	if (!err)
 		err = register_die_notifier(&kprobe_exceptions_nb);
@@ -2523,6 +2519,21 @@ static int __init init_kprobes(void)
 }
 early_initcall(init_kprobes);
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_OPTPROBES)
+static int __init init_optprobes(void)
+{
+	/*
+	 * Enable kprobe optimization - this kicks the optimizer which
+	 * depends on synchronize_rcu_tasks() and ksoftirqd, that is
+	 * not spawned in early initcall. So delay the optimization.
+	 */
+	optimize_all_kprobes();
+
+	return 0;
+}
+subsys_initcall(init_optprobes);
+#endif
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
 static void report_probe(struct seq_file *pi, struct kprobe *p,
 		const char *sym, int offset, char *modname, struct kprobe *pp)
-- 
2.25.1


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-17 14:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-09 20:27 [PATCH 1/2] rcu-tasks: move RCU-tasks initialization out of core_initcall() Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-12-09 20:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] rcu-tasks: add RCU-tasks self tests Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-12-16 15:49   ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-12-16 23:29     ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-12-21 15:38       ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-12-21 17:18         ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-12-21 18:45           ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-12-21 19:29             ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-12-21 19:48               ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-12-21 20:45                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-12-21 21:28                   ` Uladzislau Rezki
2021-02-12 19:20   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-02-12 21:12     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2021-02-12 23:48       ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-02-13  0:37         ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-02-13  0:43           ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-02-13 11:30             ` Uladzislau Rezki
2021-02-13 16:45               ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-02-13 20:00                 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2021-02-15 11:28                 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-02-16 17:30                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-02-17 14:47                     ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2021-02-17 18:17                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-02-18  5:03                         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-02-18  8:36                           ` Uladzislau Rezki
2021-02-18 14:29                             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-12-09 20:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] rcu-tasks: move RCU-tasks initialization out of core_initcall() Uladzislau Rezki
2020-12-10 13:39   ` Daniel Axtens
2020-12-10 17:32     ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-12-10 18:17     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-12-10  3:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-12-10 13:04   ` Uladzislau Rezki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210217234759.b82e39049a2e99cf6358e1c2@kernel.org \
    --to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=dja@axtens.net \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=neeraju@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=oleksiy.avramchenko@sonymobile.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).