From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
byungchul.park@lge.com, Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>,
rcu@vger.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
kernel-team@android.com
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] rcu: Remove kfree_call_rcu_nobatch()
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 15:01:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5d657e3b.1c69fb81.54250.01e2@mx.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 156693247224727@cam.corp.google.com
Now that kfree_rcu() special casing have been removed from tree RCU,
remove kfree_call_rcu_nobatch() since it is not needed.
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
---
.../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 4 ---
include/linux/rcutiny.h | 5 ---
include/linux/rcutree.h | 1 -
kernel/rcu/rcuperf.c | 10 +-----
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 33 ++++++++-----------
5 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
index 24fe8aefb12c..56be0e30100b 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
@@ -3909,10 +3909,6 @@
Number of loops doing rcuperf.kfree_alloc_num number
of allocations and frees.
- rcuperf.kfree_no_batch= [KNL]
- Use the non-batching (less efficient) version of kfree_rcu().
- This is useful for comparing with the batched version.
-
rcuperf.nreaders= [KNL]
Set number of RCU readers. The value -1 selects
N, where N is the number of CPUs. A value
diff --git a/include/linux/rcutiny.h b/include/linux/rcutiny.h
index 949841f52ec5..7aa93afa5d8d 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcutiny.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcutiny.h
@@ -39,11 +39,6 @@ static inline void kfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func)
call_rcu(head, func);
}
-static inline void kfree_call_rcu_nobatch(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func)
-{
- call_rcu(head, func);
-}
-
void rcu_qs(void);
static inline void rcu_softirq_qs(void)
diff --git a/include/linux/rcutree.h b/include/linux/rcutree.h
index 961b7e05d141..0b68aa952f8b 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcutree.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcutree.h
@@ -34,7 +34,6 @@ static inline void rcu_virt_note_context_switch(int cpu)
void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void);
void kfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func);
-void kfree_call_rcu_nobatch(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func);
void rcu_barrier(void);
bool rcu_eqs_special_set(int cpu);
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcuperf.c b/kernel/rcu/rcuperf.c
index c1e25fd10f2a..da94b89cd531 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcuperf.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcuperf.c
@@ -593,7 +593,6 @@ rcu_perf_shutdown(void *arg)
torture_param(int, kfree_nthreads, -1, "Number of threads running loops of kfree_rcu().");
torture_param(int, kfree_alloc_num, 8000, "Number of allocations and frees done in an iteration.");
torture_param(int, kfree_loops, 10, "Number of loops doing kfree_alloc_num allocations and frees.");
-torture_param(int, kfree_no_batch, 0, "Use the non-batching (slower) version of kfree_rcu().");
static struct task_struct **kfree_reader_tasks;
static int kfree_nrealthreads;
@@ -632,14 +631,7 @@ kfree_perf_thread(void *arg)
if (!alloc_ptr)
return -ENOMEM;
- if (!kfree_no_batch) {
- kfree_rcu(alloc_ptr, rh);
- } else {
- rcu_callback_t cb;
-
- cb = (rcu_callback_t)(unsigned long)offsetof(struct kfree_obj, rh);
- kfree_call_rcu_nobatch(&(alloc_ptr->rh), cb);
- }
+ kfree_rcu(alloc_ptr, rh);
}
cond_resched();
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 12c17e10f2b4..c767973d62ac 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -2777,8 +2777,10 @@ static void kfree_rcu_work(struct work_struct *work)
rcu_lock_acquire(&rcu_callback_map);
trace_rcu_invoke_kfree_callback(rcu_state.name, head, offset);
- /* Could be possible to optimize with kfree_bulk in future */
- kfree((void *)head - offset);
+ if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(!__is_kfree_rcu_offset(offset))) {
+ /* Could be optimized with kfree_bulk() in future. */
+ kfree((void *)head - offset);
+ }
rcu_lock_release(&rcu_callback_map);
cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs();
@@ -2856,16 +2858,6 @@ static void kfree_rcu_monitor(struct work_struct *work)
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&krcp->lock, flags);
}
-/*
- * This version of kfree_call_rcu does not do batching of kfree_rcu() requests.
- * Used only by rcuperf torture test for comparison with kfree_rcu_batch().
- */
-void kfree_call_rcu_nobatch(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func)
-{
- __call_rcu(head, func);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kfree_call_rcu_nobatch);
-
/*
* Queue a request for lazy invocation of kfree() after a grace period.
*
@@ -2885,12 +2877,6 @@ void kfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func)
unsigned long flags;
struct kfree_rcu_cpu *krcp;
- /* kfree_call_rcu() batching requires timers to be up. If the scheduler
- * is not yet up, just skip batching and do the non-batched version.
- */
- if (rcu_scheduler_active != RCU_SCHEDULER_RUNNING)
- return kfree_call_rcu_nobatch(head, func);
-
if (debug_rcu_head_queue(head)) {
/* Probable double kfree_rcu() */
WARN_ONCE(1, "kfree_call_rcu(): Double-freed call. rcu_head %p\n",
@@ -2909,8 +2895,15 @@ void kfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func)
krcp->head = head;
/* Schedule monitor for timely drain after KFREE_DRAIN_JIFFIES. */
- if (!xchg(&krcp->monitor_todo, true))
- schedule_delayed_work(&krcp->monitor_work, KFREE_DRAIN_JIFFIES);
+ if (!xchg(&krcp->monitor_todo, true)) {
+ /* Scheduling the monitor requires scheduler/timers to be up,
+ * if it is not, just skip it. An eventual kfree_rcu() will
+ * kick it again.
+ */
+ if ((rcu_scheduler_active == RCU_SCHEDULER_RUNNING)) {
+ schedule_delayed_work(&krcp->monitor_work, KFREE_DRAIN_JIFFIES);
+ }
+ }
spin_unlock(&krcp->lock);
local_irq_restore(flags);
--
2.23.0.187.g17f5b7556c-goog
next reply other threads:[~2019-08-27 19:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-27 19:01 Joel Fernandes (Google) [this message]
2019-08-28 21:56 ` [PATCH 5/5] rcu: Remove kfree_call_rcu_nobatch() Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-29 22:23 ` Joel Fernandes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5d657e3b.1c69fb81.54250.01e2@mx.google.com \
--to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).