From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
To: casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: casey@schaufler-ca.com, keescook@chromium.org,
john.johansen@canonical.com, penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp,
paul@paul-moore.com, sds@tycho.nsa.gov
Subject: [PATCH v8 05/28] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_audit_rule_match
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 16:29:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190829232935.7099-6-casey@schaufler-ca.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190829232935.7099-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Change the secid parameter of security_audit_rule_match
to a lsmblob structure pointer. Pass the entry from the
lsmblob structure for the approprite slot to the LSM hook.
Change the users of security_audit_rule_match to use the
lsmblob instead of a u32. In some cases this requires a
temporary conversion using lsmblob_init() that will go
away when other interfaces get converted.
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
---
include/linux/security.h | 7 ++++---
kernel/auditfilter.c | 7 +++++--
kernel/auditsc.c | 14 ++++++++++----
security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 4 ++--
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 7 +++++--
security/security.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
6 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
index 5bb8b9a6fa84..4f8b478bc3a1 100644
--- a/include/linux/security.h
+++ b/include/linux/security.h
@@ -1761,7 +1761,8 @@ static inline int security_key_getsecurity(struct key *key, char **_buffer)
#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
int security_audit_rule_init(u32 field, u32 op, char *rulestr, void **lsmrule);
int security_audit_rule_known(struct audit_krule *krule);
-int security_audit_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op, void *lsmrule);
+int security_audit_rule_match(struct lsmblob *blob, u32 field, u32 op,
+ void *lsmrule);
void security_audit_rule_free(void *lsmrule);
#else
@@ -1777,8 +1778,8 @@ static inline int security_audit_rule_known(struct audit_krule *krule)
return 0;
}
-static inline int security_audit_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op,
- void *lsmrule)
+static inline int security_audit_rule_match(struct lsmblob *blob, u32 field,
+ u32 op, void *lsmrule)
{
return 0;
}
diff --git a/kernel/auditfilter.c b/kernel/auditfilter.c
index 63f8b3f26fab..8786b95b60bd 100644
--- a/kernel/auditfilter.c
+++ b/kernel/auditfilter.c
@@ -1324,6 +1324,7 @@ int audit_filter(int msgtype, unsigned int listtype)
struct audit_field *f = &e->rule.fields[i];
pid_t pid;
u32 sid;
+ struct lsmblob blob;
switch (f->type) {
case AUDIT_PID:
@@ -1354,8 +1355,10 @@ int audit_filter(int msgtype, unsigned int listtype)
case AUDIT_SUBJ_CLR:
if (f->lsm_rule) {
security_task_getsecid(current, &sid);
- result = security_audit_rule_match(sid,
- f->type, f->op, f->lsm_rule);
+ lsmblob_init(&blob, sid);
+ result = security_audit_rule_match(
+ &blob, f->type,
+ f->op, f->lsm_rule);
}
break;
case AUDIT_EXE:
diff --git a/kernel/auditsc.c b/kernel/auditsc.c
index d1eab1d4a930..18ee5556c086 100644
--- a/kernel/auditsc.c
+++ b/kernel/auditsc.c
@@ -445,6 +445,7 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk,
const struct cred *cred;
int i, need_sid = 1;
u32 sid;
+ struct lsmblob blob;
unsigned int sessionid;
cred = rcu_dereference_check(tsk->cred, tsk == current || task_creation);
@@ -630,7 +631,9 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk,
security_task_getsecid(tsk, &sid);
need_sid = 0;
}
- result = security_audit_rule_match(sid, f->type,
+ lsmblob_init(&blob, sid);
+ result = security_audit_rule_match(&blob,
+ f->type,
f->op,
f->lsm_rule);
}
@@ -645,15 +648,17 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk,
if (f->lsm_rule) {
/* Find files that match */
if (name) {
+ lsmblob_init(&blob, name->osid);
result = security_audit_rule_match(
- name->osid,
+ &blob,
f->type,
f->op,
f->lsm_rule);
} else if (ctx) {
list_for_each_entry(n, &ctx->names_list, list) {
+ lsmblob_init(&blob, n->osid);
if (security_audit_rule_match(
- n->osid,
+ &blob,
f->type,
f->op,
f->lsm_rule)) {
@@ -665,7 +670,8 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk,
/* Find ipc objects that match */
if (!ctx || ctx->type != AUDIT_IPC)
break;
- if (security_audit_rule_match(ctx->ipc.osid,
+ lsmblob_init(&blob, ctx->ipc.osid);
+ if (security_audit_rule_match(&blob,
f->type, f->op,
f->lsm_rule))
++result;
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
index d213e835c498..5a337239d9e4 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
@@ -307,8 +307,8 @@ static inline int security_filter_rule_init(u32 field, u32 op, char *rulestr,
return -EINVAL;
}
-static inline int security_filter_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op,
- void *lsmrule)
+static inline int security_filter_rule_match(struct lsmblob *blob, u32 field,
+ u32 op, void *lsmrule)
{
return -EINVAL;
}
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index e0cc323f948f..e7b8ce942950 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -327,6 +327,7 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, struct inode *inode,
for (i = 0; i < MAX_LSM_RULES; i++) {
int rc = 0;
u32 osid;
+ struct lsmblob blob;
int retried = 0;
if (!rule->lsm[i].rule)
@@ -337,7 +338,8 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, struct inode *inode,
case LSM_OBJ_ROLE:
case LSM_OBJ_TYPE:
security_inode_getsecid(inode, &osid);
- rc = security_filter_rule_match(osid,
+ lsmblob_init(&blob, osid);
+ rc = security_filter_rule_match(&blob,
rule->lsm[i].type,
Audit_equal,
rule->lsm[i].rule);
@@ -345,7 +347,8 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, struct inode *inode,
case LSM_SUBJ_USER:
case LSM_SUBJ_ROLE:
case LSM_SUBJ_TYPE:
- rc = security_filter_rule_match(secid,
+ lsmblob_init(&blob, secid);
+ rc = security_filter_rule_match(&blob,
rule->lsm[i].type,
Audit_equal,
rule->lsm[i].rule);
diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index 27e2db3d6b04..fa6e425e6f29 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ static int lsm_append(const char *new, char **result)
/*
* Current index to use while initializing the lsmblob secid list.
*/
-static int lsm_slot __initdata;
+static int lsm_slot __lsm_ro_after_init;
/**
* security_add_hooks - Add a modules hooks to the hook lists.
@@ -2433,9 +2433,21 @@ void security_audit_rule_free(void *lsmrule)
call_void_hook(audit_rule_free, lsmrule);
}
-int security_audit_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op, void *lsmrule)
+int security_audit_rule_match(struct lsmblob *blob, u32 field, u32 op,
+ void *lsmrule)
{
- return call_int_hook(audit_rule_match, 0, secid, field, op, lsmrule);
+ struct security_hook_list *hp;
+ int rc;
+
+ hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.audit_rule_match, list) {
+ if (WARN_ON(hp->lsmid->slot < 0 || hp->lsmid->slot >= lsm_slot))
+ continue;
+ rc = hp->hook.audit_rule_match(blob->secid[hp->lsmid->slot],
+ field, op, lsmrule);
+ if (rc != 0)
+ return rc;
+ }
+ return 0;
}
#endif /* CONFIG_AUDIT */
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-29 23:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-29 23:29 [PATCH v8 00/28] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2019-08-29 23:29 ` [PATCH v8 01/28] LSM: Infrastructure management of the superblock Casey Schaufler
2019-09-16 18:19 ` Stephen Smalley
2019-08-29 23:29 ` [PATCH v8 02/28] LSM: Infrastructure management of the sock security Casey Schaufler
2019-09-16 18:42 ` Stephen Smalley
2019-09-18 7:19 ` John Johansen
2019-08-29 23:29 ` [PATCH v8 03/28] LSM: Infrastructure management of the key blob Casey Schaufler
2019-09-16 18:47 ` Stephen Smalley
2019-08-29 23:29 ` [PATCH v8 04/28] LSM: Create and manage the lsmblob data structure Casey Schaufler
2019-09-16 19:15 ` Stephen Smalley
2019-09-23 15:56 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-08-29 23:29 ` Casey Schaufler [this message]
2019-08-29 23:29 ` [PATCH v8 06/28] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_kernel_act_as Casey Schaufler
2019-08-29 23:29 ` [PATCH v8 07/28] net: Prepare UDS for security module stacking Casey Schaufler
2019-08-29 23:29 ` [PATCH v8 08/28] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secctx_to_secid Casey Schaufler
2019-08-29 23:29 ` [PATCH v8 09/28] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2019-08-29 23:29 ` [PATCH v8 10/28] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_ipc_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-08-29 23:29 ` [PATCH v8 11/28] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_task_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-08-29 23:29 ` [PATCH v8 12/28] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_inode_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-08-29 23:29 ` [PATCH v8 13/28] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_cred_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-08-29 23:29 ` [PATCH v8 14/28] IMA: Change internal interfaces to use lsmblobs Casey Schaufler
2019-08-29 23:29 ` [PATCH v8 15/28] LSM: Specify which LSM to display Casey Schaufler
2019-08-29 23:29 ` [PATCH v8 16/28] LSM: Ensure the correct LSM context releaser Casey Schaufler
2019-08-29 23:29 ` [PATCH v8 17/28] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2019-08-29 23:29 ` [PATCH v8 18/28] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_dentry_init_security Casey Schaufler
2019-08-29 23:29 ` [PATCH v8 19/28] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_inode_getsecctx Casey Schaufler
2019-08-29 23:29 ` [PATCH v8 20/28] LSM: security_secid_to_secctx in netlink netfilter Casey Schaufler
2019-08-29 23:29 ` [PATCH v8 21/28] NET: Store LSM netlabel data in a lsmblob Casey Schaufler
2019-08-29 23:29 ` [PATCH v8 22/28] SELinux: Verify LSM display sanity in binder Casey Schaufler
2019-09-18 17:43 ` Stephen Smalley
2019-08-29 23:29 ` [PATCH v8 23/28] Audit: Add subj_LSM fields when necessary Casey Schaufler
2019-08-29 23:29 ` [PATCH v8 24/28] Audit: Include object data for all security modules Casey Schaufler
2019-08-29 23:29 ` [PATCH v8 25/28] LSM: Provide an user space interface for the default display Casey Schaufler
2019-08-29 23:29 ` [PATCH v8 26/28] NET: Add SO_PEERCONTEXT for multiple LSMs Casey Schaufler
2019-08-29 23:29 ` [PATCH v8 27/28] LSM: Add /proc attr entry for full LSM context Casey Schaufler
2019-08-29 23:29 ` [PATCH v8 28/28] AppArmor: Remove the exclusive flag Casey Schaufler
2019-09-04 19:13 ` [PATCH v8 00/28] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2019-09-06 13:46 ` Stephen Smalley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190829232935.7099-6-casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--to=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=casey.schaufler@intel.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).