From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
linux- stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: stable-rc 4.9: arm: arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S:158: Error: bad instruction `ldcleq p11,cr0,[r10],#32*4'
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 18:07:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200601170751.GO1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200601170248.GA1105493@kroah.com>
On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 07:02:48PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 09:18:34PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > stable-rc 4.9 arm architecture build failed due to
> > following errors,
> >
> > # make -sk KBUILD_BUILD_USER=TuxBuild -C/linux -j16 ARCH=arm
> > CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabihf- HOSTCC=gcc CC="sccache
> > arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc" O=build zImage
> > #
> > ../arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S: Assembler messages:
> > ../arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S:158: Error: bad instruction `ldcleq p11,cr0,[r10],#32*4'
> > ../arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S:233: Error: bad instruction `stcleq p11,cr0,[r0],#32*4'
> > make[2]: *** [../scripts/Makefile.build:404: arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.o] Error 1
> > make[2]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
> > make[1]: *** [/linux/Makefile:1040: arch/arm/vfp] Error 2
> > ../arch/arm/lib/changebit.S: Assembler messages:
> > ../arch/arm/lib/changebit.S:15: Error: bad instruction `strbne r1,[ip]'
It looks like Naresh's toolchain doesn't like the new format
instructions. Which toolchain (and versions of the individual
tools) are you (Naresh) using?
> Odd, I'll drop it from 4.9, but it's also in the 4.14 and 4.19 queues as
> well, is it causing issues there too?
What if it turns out that Naresh is using an ancient toolchain
that isn't supported by these kernels? Does that still count as
a reason to drop the patch?
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC for 0.8m (est. 1762m) line in suburbia: sync at 13.1Mbps down 424kbps up
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-01 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-01 15:48 stable-rc 4.9: arm: arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S:158: Error: bad instruction `ldcleq p11,cr0,[r10],#32*4' Naresh Kamboju
2020-06-01 17:02 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-06-01 17:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin [this message]
2020-06-01 17:21 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-06-01 17:35 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-06-01 17:38 ` Naresh Kamboju
2020-06-01 17:31 ` Naresh Kamboju
2020-06-01 18:26 ` Sasha Levin
2020-06-01 18:33 ` Naresh Kamboju
2020-06-01 18:29 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-01 19:45 ` Naresh Kamboju
2020-06-01 20:37 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200601170751.GO1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).