[PATCH 4.19 52/56] x86/unwind/orc: Fix ORC for newly forked tasks

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>

[ Upstream commit 372a8eaa05998cd45b3417d0e0ffd3a70978211a ]

The ORC unwinder fails to unwind newly forked tasks which haven't yet
run on the CPU.  It correctly reads the 'ret_from_fork' instruction
pointer from the stack, but it incorrectly interprets that value as a
call stack address rather than a "signal" one, so the address gets
incorrectly decremented in the call to orc_find(), resulting in bad ORC
data.

Fix it by forcing 'ret_from_fork' frames to be signal frames.

Reported-by: Wang ShaoBo <bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Wang ShaoBo <bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/f91a8778dde8aae7f71884b5df2b16d552040441.1594994374.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c | 8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c
index 2701b370e58fe..1d264ba1e56d1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c
@@ -420,8 +420,11 @@ bool unwind_next_frame(struct unwind_state *state)
 	/*
 	 * Find the orc_entry associated with the text address.
 	 *
-	 * Decrement call return addresses by one so they work for sibling
-	 * calls and calls to noreturn functions.
+	 * For a call frame (as opposed to a signal frame), state->ip points to
+	 * the instruction after the call.  That instruction's stack layout
+	 * could be different from the call instruction's layout, for example
+	 * if the call was to a noreturn function.  So get the ORC data for the
+	 * call instruction itself.
 	 */
 	orc = orc_find(state->signal ? state->ip : state->ip - 1);
 	if (!orc)
@@ -634,6 +637,7 @@ void __unwind_start(struct unwind_state *state, struct task_struct *task,
 		state->sp = task->thread.sp;
 		state->bp = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(frame->bp);
 		state->ip = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(frame->ret_addr);
+		state->signal = (void *)state->ip == ret_from_fork;
 	}
 
 	if (get_stack_info((unsigned long *)state->sp, state->task,
-- 
2.25.1