stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
To: 'Linus Torvalds' <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com>,
	Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, "Davidlohr Bueso" <dbueso@suse.de>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	"e@80x24.org" <e@80x24.org>, Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-aio@kvack.org" <linux-aio@kvack.org>,
	"omar.kilani@gmail.com" <omar.kilani@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] signal: remove the wrong signal_pending() check in restore_user_sigmask()
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 09:02:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <263d0e478ee447d9aa10baab0d8673a5@AcuMS.aculab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wjSOh5zmApq2qsNjmY-GMn4CWe9YwdcKPjT+nVoGiDKOQ@mail.gmail.com>

From: Linus Torvalds
> Sent: 04 June 2019 22:27
> Ugh. I htink this is correct, but I wish we had a better and more
> intuitive interface.
> 
> In particular, since restore_user_sigmask() basically wants to check
> for "signal_pending()" anyway (to decide if the mask should be
> restored by signal handling or by that function), I really get the
> feeling that a lot of these patterns like
> 
> > -       restore_user_sigmask(ksig.sigmask, &sigsaved);
> > -       if (signal_pending(current) && !ret)
> > +
> > +       interrupted = signal_pending(current);
> > +       restore_user_sigmask(ksig.sigmask, &sigsaved, interrupted);
> > +       if (interrupted && !ret)
> >                 ret = -ERESTARTNOHAND;
> 
> are wrong to begin with, and we really should aim for an interface
> which says "tell me whether you completed the system call, and I'll
> give you an error return if not".
> 
> How about we make restore_user_sigmask() take two return codes: the
> 'ret' we already have, and the return we would get if there is a
> signal pending and w're currently returning zero.
> 
> IOW, I think the above could become
> 
>         ret = restore_user_sigmask(ksig.sigmask, &sigsaved, ret, -ERESTARTHAND);
> 
> instead if we just made the right interface decision.

I think we should tell restore_user_sigmask() whether it should
cause any signal handles to be run (using the current mask)
and it should tell us whether it would run any (ie if it deferred
restoring the mask to syscall exit).

So the above would (probably) be:
	if (restore_user_sigmask(ksig.sigmask, &sigsaved, true) && !ret)
		ret = -ERESTARTNOHAND;

epoll() would have:
	if (restore_user_sigmask(xxx.sigmask, &sigsaved, !ret || ret == -EINTR))
		ret = -EINTR;

I also think it could be simplified if code that loaded the 'user sigmask'
saved the old one in 'current->saved_sigmask' (and saved that it had done it).
You'd not need 'sigsaved' nor pass the user sigmask address into
the restore function.

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-05  9:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 95+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-22  3:21 [PATCH v2] signal: Adjust error codes according to restore_user_sigmask() Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-22 15:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-22 15:55   ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-22 16:14     ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-22 16:33       ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-23  9:03         ` David Laight
2019-05-23 14:59           ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-23 16:18             ` David Laight
2019-05-23 16:36               ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-23 16:56                 ` David Laight
2019-05-23 18:06                   ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-23 20:41                     ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-23 21:06                       ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-24  9:58                     ` David Laight
2019-05-24 14:10                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-24 15:16                       ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-24 16:33                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-24 17:01                           ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-27 15:04                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-28 20:47                               ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-29 16:57                                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-29 18:42                                   ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-28  9:02                             ` David Laight
2019-05-28  9:12                             ` David Laight
2019-05-28 11:37                               ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-28 12:04                                 ` David Laight
2019-05-24 14:19                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-24 14:29                       ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-24 14:51                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-24 13:29                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-24 14:59                     ` David Laight
2019-05-24 15:09                       ` David Laight
2019-05-24 15:46                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-24 15:44                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-24 16:40                         ` David Laight
2019-05-23 14:33         ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-22 22:18 ` Chris Down
2019-05-22 22:52   ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-29 16:11 ` pselect/etc semantics (Was: [PATCH v2] signal: Adjust error codes according to restore_user_sigmask()) Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-29 16:54   ` David Laight
2019-05-29 18:50     ` Eric Wong
2019-05-30  9:34       ` David Laight
2019-05-30 13:04       ` pselect/etc semantics Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-29 16:56   ` pselect/etc semantics (Was: [PATCH v2] signal: Adjust error codes according to restore_user_sigmask()) Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-29 18:26   ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-29 22:32   ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-05-30  1:54     ` pselect/etc semantics Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-30 18:28       ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-05-30 14:40     ` pselect/etc semantics (Was: [PATCH v2] signal: Adjust error codes according to restore_user_sigmask()) Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-30 18:37       ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-05-30 13:01   ` pselect/etc semantics Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-30 15:18     ` David Laight
2019-05-30 16:13       ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-30 15:38     ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-30 15:48       ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-30 16:59         ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-30 16:08       ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-30 17:20         ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-30 16:22       ` David Laight
2019-05-30 15:57     ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-30 21:03     ` Eric Wong
2019-06-04 13:41   ` [PATCH] signal: remove the wrong signal_pending() check in restore_user_sigmask() Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-04 15:31     ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-06-04 15:57       ` David Laight
2019-06-04 16:37     ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-06-04 18:14       ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-06-04 18:35     ` Eric Wong
2019-06-04 21:26     ` Linus Torvalds
2019-06-04 22:24       ` Eric Wong
2019-06-04 23:51       ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-06-05  9:04         ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-05  8:56       ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-05  9:02       ` David Laight [this message]
2019-06-05  9:25         ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-05  9:58           ` David Laight
2019-06-05 15:58     ` [PATCH -mm 0/1] signal: simplify set_user_sigmask/restore_user_sigmask Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-05 15:58       ` [PATCH -mm 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-06  0:14         ` kbuild test robot
2019-06-06  1:06         ` kbuild test robot
2019-06-06  7:25         ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-06  7:30           ` Sedat Dilek
2019-06-05 17:24       ` [PATCH -mm 0/1] " Linus Torvalds
2019-06-06  9:05         ` David Laight
2019-06-06 11:05           ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-06 11:29             ` David Laight
2019-06-06 12:41               ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-06 13:23                 ` David Laight
2019-06-06 10:22         ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-06 11:32       ` [PATCH -mm V2 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-06 14:08     ` [PATCH 0/2] select: simplify the usage of restore_saved_sigmask_unless() Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-06 14:08       ` [PATCH 1/2] select: change do_poll() to return -ERESTARTNOHAND rather than -EINTR Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-07 18:05         ` Linus Torvalds
2019-06-06 14:09       ` [PATCH 2/2] select: shift restore_saved_sigmask_unless() into poll_select_copy_remaining() Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-07 21:39       ` [RFC PATCH 0/5]: Removing saved_sigmask Eric W. Biederman
2019-06-11 18:58         ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=263d0e478ee447d9aa10baab0d8673a5@AcuMS.aculab.com \
    --to=david.laight@aculab.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=dbueso@suse.de \
    --cc=deepa.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=e@80x24.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
    --cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=omar.kilani@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).