stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH 02/15] crypto: morus - fix handling chunked inputs
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 10:05:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFqZXNv+=qgg+Jo4iC72D++BmoxK4S0XiKED47M7MQJjFtMYRw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190123224926.250525-3-ebiggers@kernel.org>

Hi Eric,

On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 11:52 PM Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org> wrote:
> From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
>
> The generic MORUS implementations all fail the improved AEAD tests
> because they produce the wrong result with some data layouts.  Fix them.
>
> Fixes: 396be41f16fd ("crypto: morus - Add generic MORUS AEAD implementations")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.18+
> Cc: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
> ---
>  crypto/morus1280.c | 13 +++++++------
>  crypto/morus640.c  | 13 +++++++------
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/crypto/morus1280.c b/crypto/morus1280.c
> index 3889c188f266..b83576b4eb55 100644
> --- a/crypto/morus1280.c
> +++ b/crypto/morus1280.c
> @@ -366,18 +366,19 @@ static void crypto_morus1280_process_crypt(struct morus1280_state *state,
>                                            const struct morus1280_ops *ops)
>  {
>         struct skcipher_walk walk;
> -       u8 *dst;
> -       const u8 *src;
>
>         ops->skcipher_walk_init(&walk, req, false);
>
>         while (walk.nbytes) {
> -               src = walk.src.virt.addr;
> -               dst = walk.dst.virt.addr;
> +               unsigned int nbytes = walk.nbytes;
>
> -               ops->crypt_chunk(state, dst, src, walk.nbytes);
> +               if (nbytes < walk.total)
> +                       nbytes = round_down(nbytes, walk.stride);
>
> -               skcipher_walk_done(&walk, 0);
> +               ops->crypt_chunk(state, walk.dst.virt.addr, walk.src.virt.addr,
> +                                nbytes);
> +
> +               skcipher_walk_done(&walk, walk.nbytes - nbytes);
>         }

Hm... I assume the problem was that skcipher_walk may give you nbytes
that is not rounded to the algorithm's walksize (aka walk.stride) even
in the middle of the stream, right? I must have misread the code in
skcipher.c and assumed that it automatically makes every step of a
round size, with the exception of the very last one, which may include
a final partial block. Thinking about it now it makes sense to me that
this isn't the case, since for stream ciphers it would mean some
unnecessary memcpy'ing in the skcipher_walk code...

Maybe you could explain the problem in one or two sentences in the
commit message(s), since the contract of skcipher_walk doesn't seem to
be documented anywhere and so it is not obvious why the change is
necessary.

Thank you for all your work on this - the improved testmgr tests were
long needed!

>  }
>
> diff --git a/crypto/morus640.c b/crypto/morus640.c
> index da06ec2f6a80..b6a477444f6d 100644
> --- a/crypto/morus640.c
> +++ b/crypto/morus640.c
> @@ -365,18 +365,19 @@ static void crypto_morus640_process_crypt(struct morus640_state *state,
>                                           const struct morus640_ops *ops)
>  {
>         struct skcipher_walk walk;
> -       u8 *dst;
> -       const u8 *src;
>
>         ops->skcipher_walk_init(&walk, req, false);
>
>         while (walk.nbytes) {
> -               src = walk.src.virt.addr;
> -               dst = walk.dst.virt.addr;
> +               unsigned int nbytes = walk.nbytes;
>
> -               ops->crypt_chunk(state, dst, src, walk.nbytes);
> +               if (nbytes < walk.total)
> +                       nbytes = round_down(nbytes, walk.stride);
>
> -               skcipher_walk_done(&walk, 0);
> +               ops->crypt_chunk(state, walk.dst.virt.addr, walk.src.virt.addr,
> +                                nbytes);
> +
> +               skcipher_walk_done(&walk, walk.nbytes - nbytes);
>         }
>  }
>
> --
> 2.20.1.321.g9e740568ce-goog
>

--
Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace at redhat dot com>
Associate Software Engineer, Security Technologies
Red Hat, Inc.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-31  9:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20190123224926.250525-1-ebiggers@kernel.org>
2019-01-23 22:49 ` [RFC/RFT PATCH 01/15] crypto: aegis - fix handling chunked inputs Eric Biggers
2019-01-23 22:49 ` [RFC/RFT PATCH 02/15] crypto: morus " Eric Biggers
2019-01-31  9:05   ` Ondrej Mosnacek [this message]
2019-02-01  5:25     ` Eric Biggers
2019-01-23 22:49 ` [RFC/RFT PATCH 03/15] crypto: x86/aegis - fix handling chunked inputs and MAY_SLEEP Eric Biggers
2019-01-23 22:49 ` [RFC/RFT PATCH 04/15] crypto: x86/morus " Eric Biggers
2019-01-23 22:49 ` [RFC/RFT PATCH 05/15] crypto: x86/aesni-gcm - fix crash on empty plaintext Eric Biggers
2019-01-23 22:49 ` [RFC/RFT PATCH 06/15] crypto: ahash - fix another early termination in hash walk Eric Biggers
2019-01-23 22:49 ` [RFC/RFT PATCH 07/15] crypto: arm64/aes-neonbs - fix returning final keystream block Eric Biggers
2019-01-24 12:11   ` Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAFqZXNv+=qgg+Jo4iC72D++BmoxK4S0XiKED47M7MQJjFtMYRw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=omosnace@redhat.com \
    --cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).