From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: overlayfs <linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>,
gscrivan@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH][V3] overlayfs: During copy up, first copy up data and then xattrs
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 10:26:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJfpegvNQmG4=5i_Q7uMzFa_-UDMXr4JL-2rP=a3F+9sPvbs1g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190111183743.GC16012@redhat.com>
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 7:37 PM Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> If a file with capability set (and hence security.capability xattr) is
> written kernel clears security.capability xattr. For overlay, during file
> copy up if xattrs are copied up first and then data is, copied up. This
> means data copy up will result in clearing of security.capability xattr
> file on lower has. And this can result into surprises. If
> a lower file has CAP_SETUID, then it should not be cleared over
> copy up (if nothing was actually written to file).
>
> This also creates problems with chown logic where it first copies up file
> and then tries to clear setuid bit. But by that time security.capability
> xattr is already gone (due to data copy up), and caller gets -ENODATA.
> This has been reported by Giuseppe here.
>
> https://github.com/containers/libpod/issues/2015#issuecomment-447824842
>
> Fix this by copying up data first and then metadta. This is a regression
> which has been introduced by my commit as part of metadata only copy up
> patches.
>
> TODO: There will be some corner cases where a file is copied up metadata
> only and later data copy up happens and that will clear
> security.capability xattr. Something needs to be done about that too.
>
> Fixes: bd64e57586d3 ("ovl: During copy up, first copy up metadata and then data")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.19+
> Reported-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Thanks, applied.
Miklos
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-15 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-11 18:37 [PATCH][V3] overlayfs: During copy up, first copy up data and then xattrs Vivek Goyal
2019-01-15 9:26 ` Miklos Szeredi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJfpegvNQmG4=5i_Q7uMzFa_-UDMXr4JL-2rP=a3F+9sPvbs1g@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=dwalsh@redhat.com \
--cc=gscrivan@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).