From: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>,
stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Christopher Li <sparse@chrisli.org>,
Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [for-stable-4.19 PATCH 1/2] vmlinux.lds.h: Create section for protection against instrumentation
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2021 06:48:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANMq1KDsqsF2AOeY033rUj_Sit57a7O77kZ9Ob=56veGLK_H+Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YFSRRux3FHJVgWXt@kroah.com>
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:55 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 12:20:22PM +0100, Alexandre Chartre wrote:
> >
> > On 3/19/21 11:39 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 07:54:15AM +0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> > > > From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > > >
> > > > commit 6553896666433e7efec589838b400a2a652b3ffa upstream.
> > > >
> > > > Some code pathes, especially the low level entry code, must be protected
> > > > against instrumentation for various reasons:
> > > >
> > > > - Low level entry code can be a fragile beast, especially on x86.
> > > >
> > > > - With NO_HZ_FULL RCU state needs to be established before using it.
> > > >
> > > > Having a dedicated section for such code allows to validate with tooling
> > > > that no unsafe functions are invoked.
> > > >
> > > > Add the .noinstr.text section and the noinstr attribute to mark
> > > > functions. noinstr implies notrace. Kprobes will gain a section check
> > > > later.
> > > >
> > > > Provide also a set of markers: instrumentation_begin()/end()
> > > >
> > > > These are used to mark code inside a noinstr function which calls
> > > > into regular instrumentable text section as safe.
> > > >
> > > > The instrumentation markers are only active when CONFIG_DEBUG_ENTRY is
> > > > enabled as the end marker emits a NOP to prevent the compiler from merging
> > > > the annotation points. This means the objtool verification requires a
> > > > kernel compiled with this option.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>
> > > > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > > > Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200505134100.075416272@linutronix.de
> > > >
> > > > [Nicolas: context conflicts in:
> > > > arch/powerpc/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
> > > > include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> > > > include/linux/compiler.h
> > > > include/linux/compiler_types.h]
> > > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
> > >
> > > Did you build this on x86?
> > >
> > > I get the following build error:
> > >
> > > ld:./arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds:20: syntax error
> > >
> > > And that line looks like:
> > >
> > > . = ALIGN(8); *(.text.hot .text.hot.*) *(.text .text.fixup) *(.text.unlikely .text.unlikely.*) *(.text.unknown .text.unknown.*) . = ALIGN(8); __noinstr_text_start = .; *(.__attribute__((noinline)) __attribute__((no_instrument_function)) __attribute((__section__(".noinstr.text"))).text) __noinstr_text_end = .; *(.text..refcount) *(.ref.text) *(.meminit.text*) *(.memexit.text*)
> > >
> >
> > In the NOINSTR_TEXT macro, noinstr is expanded with the value of the noinstr
> > macro from linux/compiler_types.h while it shouldn't.
> >
> > The problem is possibly that the noinstr macro is defined for assembly. Make
> > sure that the macro is not defined for assembly e.g.:
> >
> > #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> >
> > /* Section for code which can't be instrumented at all */
> > #define noinstr \
> > noinline notrace __attribute((__section__(".noinstr.text")))
> >
> > #endif
>
> This implies that the backport is incorrect, so I'll wait for an updated
> version...
Yep, sorry about that. I did test on ARM64 only and these patches
happily went through our Chrome OS CQ (we don't have gcc coverage
though).
Guenter has a fixup here with explanation:
https://crrev.com/c/2776332, I'll look carefully and resubmit.
Thanks,
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-19 22:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-18 23:54 [for-stable-4.19 PATCH 0/2] Backport patches to fix KASAN+LKDTM with recent clang on ARM64 Nicolas Boichat
2021-03-18 23:54 ` [for-stable-4.19 PATCH 1/2] vmlinux.lds.h: Create section for protection against instrumentation Nicolas Boichat
2021-03-19 10:39 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-03-19 11:20 ` Alexandre Chartre
2021-03-19 11:55 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-03-19 22:48 ` Nicolas Boichat [this message]
2021-03-18 23:54 ` [for-stable-4.19 PATCH 2/2] lkdtm: don't move ctors to .rodata Nicolas Boichat
2021-03-19 10:30 ` [for-stable-4.19 PATCH 0/2] Backport patches to fix KASAN+LKDTM with recent clang on ARM64 Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CANMq1KDsqsF2AOeY033rUj_Sit57a7O77kZ9Ob=56veGLK_H+Q@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=drinkcat@chromium.org \
--cc=alexandre.chartre@oracle.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=dja@axtens.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=groeck@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=sparse@chrisli.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).