virtualization.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: "Zhu, Lingshan" <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	alex.williamson@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	sean.j.christopherson@intel.com, wanpengli@tencent.com,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, dan.daly@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] *** IRQ offloading for vDPA ***
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 02:13:00 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200716021111-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <97032c51-3265-c94a-9ce1-f42fcc6d3075@intel.com>

On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 09:39:17AM +0800, Zhu, Lingshan wrote:
> 
> On 7/15/2020 9:43 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
> 
> 
>     On 2020/7/12 下午10:52, Zhu Lingshan wrote:
> 
>         Hi All,
> 
>         This series intends to implement IRQ offloading for
>         vhost_vdpa.
> 
>         By the feat of irq forwarding facilities like posted
>         interrupt on X86, irq bypass can  help deliver
>         interrupts to vCPU directly.
> 
>         vDPA devices have dedicated hardware backends like VFIO
>         pass-throughed devices. So it would be possible to setup
>         irq offloading(irq bypass) for vDPA devices and gain
>         performance improvements.
> 
>         In my testing, with this feature, we can save 0.1ms
>         in a ping between two VFs on average.
> 
> 
> 
>     Hi Lingshan:
> 
>     During the virtio-networking meeting, Michael spots two possible issues:
> 
>     1) do we need an new uAPI to stop the irq offloading?
>     2) can interrupt lost during the eventfd ctx?
> 
>     For 1) I think we probably not, we can allocate an independent eventfd
>     which does not map to MSIX. So the consumer can't match the producer and we
>     fallback to eventfd based irq.
> 
> Hi Jason,
> 
> I wonder why we need to stop irq offloading, but if we need to do so, maybe a new uAPI would be more intuitive to me,
> but why and who(user? qemu?) shall initialize this process, based on what kinda of basis to make the decision?
> 
>     For 2) it looks to me guest should deal with the irq synchronization when
>     mask or unmask MSIX vectors.
> 
> Agreed!

Well we need to make sure during a switch each interrupt is reported
*somewhere*: either irq or eventfd - and not lost.


> Thanks,
> BR
> Zhu Lingshan
> 
> 
>     What's your thought?
> 
>     Thanks
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>         Zhu Lingshan (7):
>            vhost: introduce vhost_call_ctx
>            kvm/vfio: detect assigned device via irqbypass manager
>            vhost_vdpa: implement IRQ offloading functions in vhost_vdpa
>            vDPA: implement IRQ offloading helpers in vDPA core
>            virtio_vdpa: init IRQ offloading function pointers to NULL.
>            ifcvf: replace irq_request/free with helpers in vDPA core.
>            irqbypass: do not start consumer or producer when failed to connect
> 
>           arch/x86/kvm/x86.c              | 10 ++++--
>           drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c | 11 +++---
>           drivers/vdpa/vdpa.c             | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>           drivers/vhost/Kconfig           |  1 +
>           drivers/vhost/vdpa.c            | 75
>         +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>           drivers/vhost/vhost.c           | 22 ++++++++----
>           drivers/vhost/vhost.h           |  9 ++++-
>           drivers/virtio/virtio_vdpa.c    |  2 ++
>           include/linux/vdpa.h            | 11 ++++++
>           virt/kvm/vfio.c                 |  2 --
>           virt/lib/irqbypass.c            | 16 +++++----
>           11 files changed, 181 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> 
> 

      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-07-16  6:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-12 14:52 [PATCH 0/7] *** IRQ offloading for vDPA *** Zhu Lingshan
2020-07-15 13:43 ` Jason Wang
     [not found]   ` <97032c51-3265-c94a-9ce1-f42fcc6d3075@intel.com>
2020-07-16  2:59     ` Jason Wang
     [not found]       ` <29ab6da8-ed8e-6b91-d658-f3d240543b29@intel.com>
     [not found]         ` <1e91d9dd-d787-beff-2c14-9c76ffc3b285@redhat.com>
     [not found]           ` <a319cba3-8b3d-8968-0fb7-48a1d34042bf@intel.com>
2020-07-16  4:20             ` Jason Wang
2020-07-16  6:15               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-07-16  8:06                 ` Jason Wang
2020-07-16  6:13     ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200716021111-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=dan.daly@intel.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lingshan.zhu@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).