wireguard.lists.zx2c4.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.net>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: WireGuard mailing list <wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] WireGuard Snapshot `0.0.20180708` Available
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 00:07:34 +0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180711000734.5f358590@natsu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHmME9r6perr5PFyF-M6Zcife3V0KZMN-XJ09gcUr-csVxmcBA@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 10 Jul 2018 20:38:24 +0200
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> wrote:

> I might not be understanding you correctly. Do you mean to suggest
> that removing simd_relax() actually harms performance now? That having
> it in there helps performance?

Actually no, after your message I swapped kernels again to recheck, and nope,
now the one with simd_relax removed appears faster a bit as it should be (by
about 5%).

Perhaps it was something else, maybe my test bench is not ideal: both
"dual-core" VMs run on the same 8-core FX-8350, which has some of its cores
coupled to share resources, so at the scheduler's whim VMs can probably affect
each other. (Will try further tests with affinity pinning).

-- 
With respect,
Roman

      reply	other threads:[~2018-07-10 19:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-08 16:52 [ANNOUNCE] WireGuard Snapshot `0.0.20180708` Available Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-07-10 14:54 ` Roman Mamedov
2018-07-10 14:57   ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-07-10 15:57     ` Roman Mamedov
2018-07-10 18:37       ` Roman Mamedov
2018-07-10 18:38         ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-07-10 19:07           ` Roman Mamedov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180711000734.5f358590@natsu \
    --to=rm@romanrm.net \
    --cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).