From: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
To: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
patchwork@lists.ozlabs.org, workflows@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFE: use patchwork to submit a patch
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 21:23:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191011212308.xk7xcvfamwnkwovn@dcvr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191011200228.zuka44ve7hob4ia4@chatter.i7.local>
Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 10:57:02AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > So other than that minor thing, sounds interesting. It's hard to
> > determine just how difficult the whole "set up git and send a patch out"
> > process is for people these days given the _huge_ numbers of new
> > contributions we keep getting, and the numerous good tutorials we have
> > created that spell out exactly how to do this.
> >
> > So you might be "solving" a problem that we don't really have. It's
> > hard to tell :(
>
> It is interesting that there are split views on this. The main reason why I
> was thinking about it was because the topic came up a few times already. For
> example, in a conversation last year on ksummit-discuss:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/ksummit-discuss/ECADFF3FD767C149AD96A924E7EA6EAF7C1EAA24@USCULXMSG01.am.sony.com/
>
> Tim Bird mentioned that Sony developers couldn't send/receive patches
> because their corporate mail server rewrote all links to go through some
> kind of security appliance verification. If you read that thread, what we
> are discussing now is what I suggested we did then -- a web tool that could
> take corporate SMTP servers out of the equation.
>
> (This is the same reason I generally disagree with Eric Wong about
> preserving SMTP as the primary transmission protocol -- I've heard lots of
> complaints both from kernel developers and especially from people trying to
> contribute to CAF about corporate policies actually making it impossible to
> submit patches -- and no, using a different mail server is not a possibility
> for them because it can be a firing offense under their IT AUP rules.)
I'm not opposed to a webmail interface tailored to kernel hacking
which does stuff like checkpatch.pl and get_maintainer.pl before
sending (similar to your patchwork proposal and
gitgadgetgadget). That would get around security appliances
but SMTP would still be used in the background.
Or offer full-blown HTTPS webmail + IMAP + SMTP access like any
other webmail provider + checkpatch + get_maintainer helpers.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-11 21:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 96+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-10 14:41 RFE: use patchwork to submit a patch Konstantin Ryabitsev
2019-10-10 18:07 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-10-10 19:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-10-10 19:53 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2019-10-10 20:05 ` Eric Wong
2019-10-10 20:21 ` Jonathan Nieder
2019-10-10 20:36 ` Eric Wong
2019-10-11 18:05 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-10-10 20:20 ` Jonathan Nieder
2019-10-10 21:38 ` Daniel Axtens
2019-10-10 22:05 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2019-10-11 8:57 ` Greg KH
2019-10-11 17:20 ` Shuah Khan
2019-10-11 17:37 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-10-11 18:01 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-10-11 18:32 ` David Miller
2019-10-11 18:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-10-11 18:51 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-10-11 18:59 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-10-11 19:02 ` Drew DeVault
2019-10-11 19:11 ` David Miller
2019-10-11 21:19 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-10-11 21:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-10-11 22:54 ` Dave Airlie
2019-10-11 23:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-10-12 0:08 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-10-12 0:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-10-13 23:38 ` Daniel Axtens
2019-10-14 10:42 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-10-14 12:26 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2019-10-14 13:18 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-10-14 13:41 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-10-14 13:53 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2019-10-14 14:28 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-10-14 15:25 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2019-10-14 12:27 ` Daniel Axtens
2019-10-14 13:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-10-14 14:58 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-10-14 15:12 ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-10-15 4:49 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-10-15 16:30 ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-10-14 15:17 ` Greg KH
2019-10-14 15:27 ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-10-15 4:41 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-10-15 16:07 ` Greg KH
2019-10-14 20:56 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2019-10-15 4:39 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-10-15 12:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-10-15 13:35 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2019-10-15 14:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-10-15 15:21 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2019-10-15 16:37 ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-10-15 16:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-10-21 15:39 ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-10-24 13:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-10-24 13:33 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-10-24 13:58 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-10-24 14:12 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-10-15 8:57 ` Eric Wong
2019-10-15 9:11 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-10-15 16:24 ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-10-15 16:27 ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-10-21 11:16 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-11-08 9:44 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-11-08 14:02 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2019-11-08 14:11 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-11-08 14:12 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-11-08 14:17 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2019-11-08 14:25 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-11-09 4:31 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2019-11-11 9:35 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-11-11 12:08 ` Mark Brown
2019-11-11 16:17 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2019-11-11 20:38 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2019-11-08 14:17 ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-10-11 20:02 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2019-10-11 21:23 ` Eric Wong [this message]
2019-10-11 21:35 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2019-10-12 7:19 ` Greg KH
2019-10-14 11:31 ` Mark Brown
2019-10-15 16:11 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2019-10-13 23:39 ` Eric Wong
2019-10-14 7:30 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-10-14 22:18 ` Eric Wong
2019-10-15 15:34 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2019-10-14 15:33 ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-10-15 15:40 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2019-10-15 16:32 ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-10-15 16:34 ` Drew DeVault
2019-10-15 16:44 ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-10-15 17:07 ` Drew DeVault
2019-10-15 17:24 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2019-10-11 22:57 ` Dave Airlie
2019-10-12 7:31 ` Greg KH
2019-10-12 13:16 ` Stephen Finucane
2019-10-12 16:13 ` Stephen Finucane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191011212308.xk7xcvfamwnkwovn@dcvr \
--to=e@80x24.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=konstantin@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=patchwork@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).