From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F419AECE58C for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 15:35:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 811FC206C2 for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 15:35:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=cmpwn.com header.i=@cmpwn.com header.b="C+siR3QH" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727745AbfJGPfo (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Oct 2019 11:35:44 -0400 Received: from mail.cmpwn.com ([45.56.77.53]:50804 "EHLO mail.cmpwn.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728620AbfJGPfo (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Oct 2019 11:35:44 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=cmpwn.com; s=cmpwn; t=1570462543; bh=5EbnibxgrtU8jnvxGjhX+ytfVOTjUJJX/f6hMIas9Js=; h=In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:Subject:From:To; b=C+siR3QHNQ5mShEZPfHw3NgNTq8WCIcy9KI5+sWc0Aap9oXia584KqiQFbWHZIeFB I80doRbk8Dw7+EisPDCWuMxMbixzVsLFwlAi9/szJ3EzJ//SEZ7AimZFoA0Xh5+BW/ QNUiSxdJunUBiTbbVo5BK33oJ1ngjmVIs2f9Lrko= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 In-Reply-To: <20191007.173329.2182256975398971437.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 11:35:43 -0400 Cc: , Subject: Re: thoughts on a Merge Request based development workflow From: "Drew DeVault" To: "David Miller" Message-Id: Sender: workflows-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org There's no substance here to back up your arguments. You just say email is dying and hope we take it for granted that you're right. Email is _not_ terrible, and there are serious flaws with any of the proposed alternatives to it.