On Tue, 2016-03-15 at 23:40 -0400, Meng Xu wrote:
> > > > @@ -115,6 +118,18 @@
> > > >   #define RTDS_delayed_runq_add (1<<__RTDS_delayed_runq_add)
> > > > 
> > > >   /*
> > > > + * The replenishment timer handler needs to check this bit
> > > > + * to know where a replenished vcpu was, when deciding which
> > > > + * vcpu should tickle.
> > > > + * A replenished vcpu should tickle if it was moved from the
> > > > + * depleted queue to the run queue.
> > > > + * + Set in burn_budget() if a vcpu has zero budget left.
> > > > + * + Cleared and checked in the repenishment handler.
> > > 
> > > It seems you have an extra + here...
> > > Need to be removed.
> > > 
> > > My bad, I didn't spot it out in last patch... :-(
> > > 
> > You mean before "Cleared"? For __RTDS_scheduled there are '+'
> > before
> > 'Cleared', 'Checked', 'Set'.
> Yes, those two +, are unnecessary. Isn't it?
> 
I *think* the idea here was to sort of put down a bullet-ed list, but
maybe we should ask the author. According to `git blame', is a certain
Meng Xu, guy (commit 8726c055), anyone has his email address? :-D :-D

However, I don't particularly like either the style or the final result
(in terms of wording), so, let's avoid doing more of that in new code
(see my other email).

Regards,
Dario
-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)