From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dario Faggioli Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: enable per-VCPU parameter for RTDS Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 11:43:52 +0200 Message-ID: <1459849432.3166.30.camel@citrix.com> References: <1459818433-2498-1-git-send-email-lichong659@gmail.com> <57038C1F02000078000E30A9@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> <57038472.3030407@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6261761617612155755==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <57038472.3030407@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Sender: "Xen-devel" To: George Dunlap , Jan Beulich , Chong Li Cc: george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com, Chong Li , mengxu@cis.upenn.edu, dgolomb@seas.upenn.edu, xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --===============6261761617612155755== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-to8xTVaClkusu1+m5jKv" --=-to8xTVaClkusu1+m5jKv Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 10:25 +0100, George Dunlap wrote: > On 05/04/16 08:57, Jan Beulich wrote: > >=C2=A0 > > > Signed-off-by: Chong Li > > >=20 > > > Acked-by: Dario Faggioli > > This appears to be the 3rd variant of the patch, all with the same > > bogus subject, and no versioning information at all. Please > > remember that mails can arrive out of order, so there's no way > > to reliably tell which one got sent first. So for this to go in I'm > > expecting you to re-send with a proper subject and an indication > > that this is not the initial version of the patch. > And since this version of the patch is functionally different than > the > one Dario acked, you should drop his Acked-by as well. >=20 Indeed you should have. But, with the subject fixed (something like "xen: sched: fix deadlock when changing scheduling parameters") and properly versioned, you can add it again: Acked-by: Dario Faggioli > Thanks for being responsive in fixing this bug; and sorry for all the > criticism, but OSS development is very detail-oriented, and it takes > a > while to internalize all the rules for how things should be done. >=20 It does! :-) Thanks and Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-to8xTVaClkusu1+m5jKv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEABECAAYFAlcDiNgACgkQk4XaBE3IOsQJIgCfQxWgWc4Aacjhd9ePU94JoI9V INMAnRkoZp7/JWoHYFcHyXmChsmzG501 =23cJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-to8xTVaClkusu1+m5jKv-- --===============6261761617612155755== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KWGVuLWRldmVs IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApYZW4tZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMueGVuLm9yZwpodHRwOi8vbGlzdHMueGVuLm9y Zy94ZW4tZGV2ZWwK --===============6261761617612155755==--