From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7711BC43331 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 15:28:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42B0C20748 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 15:28:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=citrix.com header.i=@citrix.com header.b="McgZfqIk" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 42B0C20748 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=citrix.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jHUQ2-0006xH-Es; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 15:27:42 +0000 Received: from all-amaz-eas1.inumbo.com ([34.197.232.57] helo=us1-amaz-eas2.inumbo.com) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jHUQ1-0006xC-4n for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 15:27:41 +0000 X-Inumbo-ID: 539e4d0a-6f76-11ea-880d-12813bfff9fa Received: from esa5.hc3370-68.iphmx.com (unknown [216.71.155.168]) by us1-amaz-eas2.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 539e4d0a-6f76-11ea-880d-12813bfff9fa; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 15:27:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=citrix.com; s=securemail; t=1585236460; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding; bh=1PSTaJ180/RZBpYrNgDsW1McFsnl5htpTr3y5bTuCBo=; b=McgZfqIkv8pGxub8o0m731GYEk4VjkLz1KZKZAUUJtHN8Th6T+/MWWKX cal3sAGBaU/wKeqqxYG1G24IamFz4pEVIwfVJupENUvv6v4nRwVKDRgX6 K1Cs5AGk7LFlWw0HE0yboCSMbmeRWTFknfBJXumZUjhnMuOdEu0VMHhK+ s=; Authentication-Results: esa5.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none; spf=None smtp.pra=roger.pau@citrix.com; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=roger.pau@citrix.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@mail.citrix.com Received-SPF: None (esa5.hc3370-68.iphmx.com: no sender authenticity information available from domain of roger.pau@citrix.com) identity=pra; client-ip=162.221.158.21; receiver=esa5.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; envelope-from="roger.pau@citrix.com"; x-sender="roger.pau@citrix.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (esa5.hc3370-68.iphmx.com: domain of roger.pau@citrix.com designates 162.221.158.21 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=162.221.158.21; receiver=esa5.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; envelope-from="roger.pau@citrix.com"; x-sender="roger.pau@citrix.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"; x-record-text="v=spf1 ip4:209.167.231.154 ip4:178.63.86.133 ip4:195.66.111.40/30 ip4:85.115.9.32/28 ip4:199.102.83.4 ip4:192.28.146.160 ip4:192.28.146.107 ip4:216.52.6.88 ip4:216.52.6.188 ip4:162.221.158.21 ip4:162.221.156.83 ip4:168.245.78.127 ~all" Received-SPF: None (esa5.hc3370-68.iphmx.com: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail.citrix.com) identity=helo; client-ip=162.221.158.21; receiver=esa5.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; envelope-from="roger.pau@citrix.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail.citrix.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible IronPort-SDR: +avkQwAwGZa5zPPDsicSNkXaWTfLGc7iaji3mNSMPFH6UQTjsNi52MqKi8cD69G2NXiyNPWOuG kQgpIGmxaA00sXNX+OQ7MNjCUJ+16MWn+cRo/VRtNRFuQkulqJvCNtTVU+KSkXtsmE2UlJwgxT D8uh8IHfZH4pIKeKTmBzjsfFvn7vAl/wq8KP9by6DGRvqzJEhWc69DHrO6dpK8UXoSf0z55T1I ikSKo/cXSgYueV44N8fWxoA5EB7rGWKkCLzU7sLlude9ZpRdG1M0JkfcUg8ptHrDpD2P26gb55 dHU= X-SBRS: 2.7 X-MesageID: 15024593 X-Ironport-Server: esa5.hc3370-68.iphmx.com X-Remote-IP: 162.221.158.21 X-Policy: $RELAYED X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.72,308,1580792400"; d="scan'208";a="15024593" From: Roger Pau Monne To: Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 16:27:16 +0100 Message-ID: <20200326152720.36970-1-roger.pau@citrix.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 0/4] x86/nvmx: fixes for interrupt injection X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kevin Tian , Jun Nakajima , Wei Liu , Andrew Cooper , Jan Beulich , Roger Pau Monne Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sender: "Xen-devel" Hello, osstest identified a regression caused by my earlier attempt to fix interrupt injection when using nested VMX. This series aims to fix the regression, and should unblock several osstest branches. The following report is from osstest with this series applied: http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/149051/ Note the last patch (4/4) is the one that actually fixes the issue. Xen will always use the Ack on exit feature so patches 2/4 and 3/4 don't change the functionality when running a nested Xen, as it always requires SVI to be updated. Thanks, Roger. Roger Pau Monne (4): Revert "x86/vvmx: fix virtual interrupt injection when Ack on exit control is used" x86/nvmx: only update SVI when using Ack on exit x86/nvmx: split updating RVI from SVI in nvmx_update_apicv x86/nvmx: update exit bitmap when using virtual interrupt delivery xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/intr.c | 21 +++++++++------ xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++----------- xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.h | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) -- 2.26.0