xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Jason Andryuk <jandryuk@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: i915 dma faults on Xen
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 12:51:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201021105110.w3nyd4xod363kp4d@Air-de-Roger> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a855e542-4e12-14e2-b663-75e2efceb937@suse.com>

On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 12:33:05PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 21.10.2020 11:58, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 12:23:22PM -0400, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> >> The RMRRs are:
> >> (XEN) [VT-D]Host address width 39
> >> (XEN) [VT-D]found ACPI_DMAR_DRHD:
> >> (XEN) [VT-D]  dmaru->address = fed90000
> >> (XEN) [VT-D]drhd->address = fed90000 iommu->reg = ffff82c00021d000
> >> (XEN) [VT-D]cap = 1c0000c40660462 ecap = 19e2ff0505e
> >> (XEN) [VT-D] endpoint: 0000:00:02.0
> >> (XEN) [VT-D]found ACPI_DMAR_DRHD:
> >> (XEN) [VT-D]  dmaru->address = fed91000
> >> (XEN) [VT-D]drhd->address = fed91000 iommu->reg = ffff82c00021f000
> >> (XEN) [VT-D]cap = d2008c40660462 ecap = f050da
> >> (XEN) [VT-D] IOAPIC: 0000:00:1e.7
> >> (XEN) [VT-D] MSI HPET: 0000:00:1e.6
> >> (XEN) [VT-D]  flags: INCLUDE_ALL
> >> (XEN) [VT-D]found ACPI_DMAR_RMRR:
> >> (XEN) [VT-D] endpoint: 0000:00:14.0
> >> (XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:615:   RMRR region: base_addr 78863000 end_addr 78882fff
> >> (XEN) [VT-D]found ACPI_DMAR_RMRR:
> >> (XEN) [VT-D] endpoint: 0000:00:02.0
> >> (XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:615:   RMRR region: base_addr 7d000000 end_addr 7f7fffff
> >> (XEN) [VT-D]found ACPI_DMAR_RMRR:
> >> (XEN) [VT-D] endpoint: 0000:00:16.7
> >> (XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:581:  Non-existent device (0000:00:16.7) is
> >> reported in RMRR (78907000, 78986fff)'s scope!
> >> (XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:596:   Ignore the RMRR (78907000, 78986fff) due to
> > 
> > This is also part of a reserved region, so should be added to the
> > iommu page tables anyway regardless of this message.
> 
> Could you clarify why you think so? RMRRs are tied to devices, so
> if a device in reality doesn't exist (and no other one uses the
> same range), I don't see why an IOMMU mapping would be needed
> (unless to work around some related firmware bug). Plus aiui none
> of the IOMMU faults actually report this range as having got
> accessed.

Since it's the hardware domain that gets the gfx card assigned here it
will get any reserved regions added to the IOMMU page tables in
arch_iommu_hwdom_init. I agree it's not relevant here, since those are
not the regions reported in the IOMMU faults.

Roger.


  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-21 10:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-14 19:28 i915 dma faults on Xen Jason Andryuk
2020-10-14 19:37 ` Andrew Cooper
2020-10-15 11:31   ` Roger Pau Monné
2020-10-15 15:16     ` Jason Andryuk
2020-10-15 16:38       ` Tamas K Lengyel
2020-10-15 17:13         ` Jason Andryuk
2021-02-19 17:33           ` tboot UEFI and Xen (was Re: i915 dma faults on Xen) Jason Andryuk
2020-10-16 16:23       ` i915 dma faults on Xen Jason Andryuk
2020-10-21  9:58         ` Roger Pau Monné
2020-10-21 10:33           ` Jan Beulich
2020-10-21 10:51             ` Roger Pau Monné [this message]
2020-10-21 12:45           ` Jason Andryuk
2020-10-21 12:52             ` Jan Beulich
2020-10-21 13:36               ` Jason Andryuk
2020-10-21 13:59                 ` Jan Beulich
2021-02-19 17:30                   ` Jason Andryuk
2021-02-22 10:18                     ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-02-22 12:49                       ` Jason Andryuk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201021105110.w3nyd4xod363kp4d@Air-de-Roger \
    --to=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jandryuk@gmail.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).