From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
To: "Marek Marczykowski-Górecki" <marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>, Wei Liu <wl@xen.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>, Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>,
Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 2/2] xen/efi: optionally call SetVirtualAddressMap()
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 17:37:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <24d8f989-92e6-d6a0-7c77-f02ae6a4ef54@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aedda92afd26caac474870d44504074d3b2ff6d0.1570918263.git-series.marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com>
On 13.10.2019 00:11, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> Some UEFI implementations are not happy about running in 1:1 addressing,
> but really virtual address space.
I have to admit that I find this misleading. There's no true "physical
mode" on x86-64 anyway. What I assume happens is that people abuse the
address map change notification to do things beyond the necessary
ConvertPointer(() calls.
> --- a/xen/common/Kconfig
> +++ b/xen/common/Kconfig
> @@ -88,6 +88,19 @@ config KEXEC
>
> If unsure, say Y.
>
> +config SET_VIRTUAL_ADDRESS_MAP
I'm of the strong opinion that this wants to have an EFI_ prefix.
> + bool "EFI: call SetVirtualAddressMap()" if EXPERT = "y"
> + default n
I don't think you need this line.
> @@ -1094,6 +1100,26 @@ static void __init efi_exit_boot(EFI_HANDLE ImageHandle, EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE *Syste
> if ( EFI_ERROR(status) )
> PrintErrMesg(L"Cannot exit boot services", status);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SET_VIRTUAL_ADDRESS_MAP
> + for ( i = 0; i < efi_memmap_size; i += efi_mdesc_size )
> + {
> + EFI_MEMORY_DESCRIPTOR *desc = efi_memmap + i;
> +
> + if ( desc->Attribute & EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME )
> + desc->VirtualStart = desc->PhysicalStart;
> + else
> + desc->VirtualStart = INVALID_VIRTUAL_ADDRESS;
> + }
> + status = efi_rs->SetVirtualAddressMap(efi_memmap_size, efi_mdesc_size,
> + mdesc_ver, efi_memmap);
> + if ( status != EFI_SUCCESS )
> + {
> + printk(XENLOG_ERR "EFI: SetVirtualAddressMap() failed (%#lx), disabling runtime services\n",
> + status);
> + __clear_bit(EFI_RS, &efi_flags);
> + }
> +#endif
This new placement undermines (or at least complicates afaict) the
original intention to allow picking virtual addresses which don't
match the directmap. I can accept this as an intended tradeoff (as
you validly mention in the other patch we don't honor the 1:1 map
requirement at the time of the call with its original placement),
but it should be mentioned in one of the two patch descriptions.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-23 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-12 22:11 [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 0/2] Optionally call EFI SetVirtualAddressMap() Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2019-10-12 22:11 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 1/2] efi: remove old SetVirtualAddressMap() arrangement Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2019-10-23 15:15 ` Jan Beulich
2019-10-23 15:36 ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2019-10-23 16:10 ` Jan Beulich
2019-10-23 16:38 ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2019-10-23 15:26 ` Jan Beulich
2019-10-12 22:11 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 2/2] xen/efi: optionally call SetVirtualAddressMap() Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2019-10-15 23:40 ` Andrew Cooper
2019-10-23 15:37 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2019-10-23 16:07 ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2019-10-23 16:13 ` Jan Beulich
2019-10-15 12:25 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 0/2] Optionally call EFI SetVirtualAddressMap() Jason Andryuk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=24d8f989-92e6-d6a0-7c77-f02ae6a4ef54@suse.com \
--to=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=wl@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).