From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
To: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org>
Cc: "Kevin Tian" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
"Stefano Stabellini" <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
"Julien Grall" <julien@xen.org>, "Wei Liu" <wl@xen.org>,
"Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
"Paul Durrant" <pdurrant@amazon.com>,
"Ian Jackson" <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
"George Dunlap" <george.dunlap@citrix.com>,
"Jun Nakajima" <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
"Volodymyr Babchuk" <Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com>,
"Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/14] iommu: make map, unmap and flush all take both an order and a count
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2020 11:57:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2765087f-4168-191d-c547-cbc2e74d3fee@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200804134209.8717-8-paul@xen.org>
On 04.08.2020 15:42, Paul Durrant wrote:
> From: Paul Durrant <pdurrant@amazon.com>
>
> At the moment iommu_map() and iommu_unmap() take a page order but not a
> count, whereas iommu_iotlb_flush() takes a count but not a page order.
> This patch simply makes them consistent with each other.
Why can't we do with just a count, where order gets worked out by
functions knowing how to / wanting to deal with higher order pages?
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m-ept.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m-ept.c
> @@ -843,7 +843,7 @@ out:
> need_modify_vtd_table )
> {
> if ( iommu_use_hap_pt(d) )
> - rc = iommu_iotlb_flush(d, _dfn(gfn), (1u << order),
> + rc = iommu_iotlb_flush(d, _dfn(gfn), (1u << order), 1,
Forgot to drop the "1 << "? (There are then I think two more instances
further down.)
> --- a/xen/common/memory.c
> +++ b/xen/common/memory.c
> @@ -851,12 +851,12 @@ int xenmem_add_to_physmap(struct domain *d, struct xen_add_to_physmap *xatp,
>
> this_cpu(iommu_dont_flush_iotlb) = 0;
>
> - ret = iommu_iotlb_flush(d, _dfn(xatp->idx - done), done,
> + ret = iommu_iotlb_flush(d, _dfn(xatp->idx - done), 0, done,
Arguments wrong way round? (This risk of inverting their order is
one of the primary reasons why I think we want just a count.) I'm
also uncertain about the use of 0 vs PAGE_ORDER_4K here.
> IOMMU_FLUSHF_added | IOMMU_FLUSHF_modified);
> if ( unlikely(ret) && rc >= 0 )
> rc = ret;
>
> - ret = iommu_iotlb_flush(d, _dfn(xatp->gpfn - done), done,
> + ret = iommu_iotlb_flush(d, _dfn(xatp->gpfn - done), 0, done,
Same here then.
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-06 12:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-04 13:41 [PATCH v4 00/14] IOMMU cleanup Paul Durrant
2020-08-04 13:41 ` [PATCH v4 01/14] x86/iommu: re-arrange arch_iommu to separate common fields Paul Durrant
2020-08-14 6:14 ` Tian, Kevin
2020-08-04 13:41 ` [PATCH v4 02/14] x86/iommu: add common page-table allocator Paul Durrant
2020-08-05 15:39 ` Jan Beulich
2020-08-04 13:41 ` [PATCH v4 03/14] x86/iommu: convert VT-d code to use new page table allocator Paul Durrant
2020-08-14 6:41 ` Tian, Kevin
2020-08-14 7:16 ` Durrant, Paul
2020-08-04 13:41 ` [PATCH v4 04/14] x86/iommu: convert AMD IOMMU " Paul Durrant
2020-08-04 13:42 ` [PATCH v4 05/14] iommu: remove unused iommu_ops method and tasklet Paul Durrant
2020-08-04 13:42 ` [PATCH v4 06/14] iommu: flush I/O TLB if iommu_map() or iommu_unmap() fail Paul Durrant
2020-08-05 16:06 ` Jan Beulich
2020-08-05 16:18 ` Paul Durrant
2020-08-06 11:41 ` Jan Beulich
2020-08-14 6:53 ` Tian, Kevin
2020-08-14 7:19 ` Durrant, Paul
2020-08-04 13:42 ` [PATCH v4 07/14] iommu: make map, unmap and flush all take both an order and a count Paul Durrant
2020-08-06 9:57 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2020-08-11 11:00 ` Durrant, Paul
2020-08-14 6:57 ` Tian, Kevin
2020-08-04 13:42 ` [PATCH v4 08/14] remove remaining uses of iommu_legacy_map/unmap Paul Durrant
2020-08-06 10:28 ` Jan Beulich
2020-08-12 9:36 ` [EXTERNAL] " Paul Durrant
2020-08-04 13:42 ` [PATCH v4 09/14] common/grant_table: batch flush I/O TLB Paul Durrant
2020-08-06 11:49 ` Jan Beulich
2020-08-04 13:42 ` [PATCH v4 10/14] iommu: remove the share_p2m operation Paul Durrant
2020-08-06 12:18 ` Jan Beulich
2020-08-14 7:04 ` Tian, Kevin
2020-08-04 13:42 ` [PATCH v4 11/14] iommu: stop calling IOMMU page tables 'p2m tables' Paul Durrant
2020-08-06 12:23 ` Jan Beulich
2020-08-14 7:12 ` Tian, Kevin
2020-08-04 13:42 ` [PATCH v4 12/14] vtd: use a bit field for root_entry Paul Durrant
2020-08-06 12:34 ` Jan Beulich
2020-08-12 13:13 ` Durrant, Paul
2020-08-18 8:27 ` Jan Beulich
2020-08-14 7:17 ` Tian, Kevin
2020-08-04 13:42 ` [PATCH v4 13/14] vtd: use a bit field for context_entry Paul Durrant
2020-08-06 12:46 ` Jan Beulich
2020-08-12 13:47 ` Paul Durrant
2020-08-14 7:19 ` Tian, Kevin
2020-08-04 13:42 ` [PATCH v4 14/14] vtd: use a bit field for dma_pte Paul Durrant
2020-08-06 12:53 ` Jan Beulich
2020-08-12 13:49 ` Paul Durrant
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2765087f-4168-191d-c547-cbc2e74d3fee@suse.com \
--to=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=julien@xen.org \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=paul@xen.org \
--cc=pdurrant@amazon.com \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=wl@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).