From: Andrii Anisov <andrii.anisov@gmail.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>, Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>,
Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
"andrii_anisov@epam.com" <andrii_anisov@epam.com>,
Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] xen: introduce VCPUOP_register_runstate_phys_memory_area hypercall
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 19:23:49 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46e206de-dd8e-6931-bda6-32af5c7ba964@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5D03C06F020000780023864D@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com>
Hello Jan,
On 14.06.19 18:42, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 14.06.19 at 17:11, <andrii.anisov@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 14.06.19 17:39, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> After all they have exactly the same data...
>>
>> Yes, but normal guests should use only one interface.
>
> I thought it had been clarified already that normal guests can very
> well use both interfaces, just not both at the same time: Boot loader
> and OS could disagree in this regard, as the prime example.
I missed "at the same time".
We may require existing runstate area unregistering if the system is aware of it. But it is for the new interface.
The old one has no documentation about the unregistering. The implicit way is known to us, but not known to users.
How to solve the clash?
--
Sincerely,
Andrii Anisov.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-14 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-24 18:12 [PATCH RFC 2] [DO NOT APPLY] introduce VCPUOP_register_runstate_phys_memory_area hypercall Andrii Anisov
2019-05-24 18:12 ` [Xen-devel] " Andrii Anisov
2019-05-24 18:12 ` [PATCH v3] Introduce runstate area registration with phys address Andrii Anisov
2019-05-24 18:12 ` [Xen-devel] " Andrii Anisov
2019-05-24 18:12 ` [PATCH v3] xen: introduce VCPUOP_register_runstate_phys_memory_area hypercall Andrii Anisov
2019-05-24 18:12 ` [Xen-devel] " Andrii Anisov
2019-06-07 14:23 ` Jan Beulich
2019-06-10 11:44 ` Julien Grall
2019-06-11 9:10 ` Jan Beulich
2019-06-11 10:22 ` Andrii Anisov
2019-06-11 12:12 ` Julien Grall
2019-06-11 12:26 ` Andrii Anisov
2019-06-11 12:32 ` Julien Grall
2019-06-11 12:40 ` Andrii Anisov
2019-06-13 12:21 ` Andrii Anisov
2019-06-13 12:39 ` Jan Beulich
2019-06-13 12:32 ` Andrii Anisov
2019-06-13 12:41 ` Jan Beulich
2019-06-13 12:48 ` Julien Grall
2019-06-13 12:58 ` Jan Beulich
2019-06-13 13:14 ` Julien Grall
2019-06-13 13:40 ` Jan Beulich
2019-06-13 14:41 ` Julien Grall
2019-06-14 14:36 ` Andrii Anisov
2019-06-14 14:39 ` Julien Grall
2019-06-14 15:11 ` Andrii Anisov
2019-06-14 15:24 ` Julien Grall
2019-06-14 16:11 ` Andrii Anisov
2019-06-14 16:20 ` Julien Grall
2019-06-14 16:25 ` Andrii Anisov
2019-06-17 6:27 ` Jan Beulich
2019-06-14 15:42 ` Jan Beulich
2019-06-14 16:23 ` Andrii Anisov [this message]
2019-06-17 6:28 ` Jan Beulich
2019-06-18 15:32 ` Andrii Anisov
2019-06-18 15:44 ` Jan Beulich
2019-06-11 16:09 ` Andrii Anisov
2019-06-12 7:27 ` Jan Beulich
2019-06-13 12:17 ` Andrii Anisov
2019-06-13 12:36 ` Jan Beulich
2019-06-11 16:13 ` Andrii Anisov
2019-05-24 18:12 ` [PATCH RFC 1] [DO NOT APPLY] " Andrii Anisov
2019-05-24 18:12 ` [Xen-devel] " Andrii Anisov
2019-05-28 8:59 ` [PATCH RFC 2] " Julien Grall
2019-05-28 8:59 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall
2019-05-28 9:17 ` Andrii Anisov
2019-05-28 9:17 ` [Xen-devel] " Andrii Anisov
2019-05-28 9:23 ` Julien Grall
2019-05-28 9:23 ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall
2019-05-28 9:36 ` Andrii Anisov
2019-05-28 9:36 ` [Xen-devel] " Andrii Anisov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46e206de-dd8e-6931-bda6-32af5c7ba964@gmail.com \
--to=andrii.anisov@gmail.com \
--cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=andrii_anisov@epam.com \
--cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).