From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Cc: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/libxl: Fixes to stream v2 task joining logic
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 12:42:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55B0D321.6000000@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150723113821.GA10463@zion.uk.xensource.com>
On 23/07/15 12:38, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 12:09:38PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> During review of the libxl migration v2 series, I changes the task
>> joining logic, but clearly didn't think the result through
>> properly. This patch fixes several errors.
>>
>> 1) Do not call check_all_finished() in the success cases of
>> libxl__xc_domain_{save,restore}_done(). It serves no specific purpose
>> as the save helper state will report itself as inactive by this point,
>> and avoids triggering a second stream->completion_callback() in the case
>> that write_toolstack_record()/stream_continue() record errors
>> synchronously themselves.
>>
>> 2) Only ever set stream->rc in stream_complete(). The first version of
>> the migration v2 series had separate rc and joined_rc parameters, where
>> this logic worked. However when combining the two, the teardown path
>> fails to trigger if stream_done() records stream->rc itself. A side
>> effect of this is that stream_done() needs to take an rc parameter.
>>
>> 3) Avoid stacking of check_all_finished() via synchronous teardown of
>> tasks. If the _abort() functions call back synchronously,
>> stream->completion_callback() ends up getting called twice, as first and
>> last check_all_finished() frames observe each task being finished.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
>> CC: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
>> CC: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
>> CC: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
>>
>> ---
>> I found this while working to fix the toolstack record issue, but am
>> posting this bugfix ahead of the other work as OSSTest has tripped over
>> the issue.
> This change itself doesn't seem to have anything to do with libxc. In
> OSSTest the error that triggers this knock on effect is the failure of
> xc_map_foreign_bulk. Does that mean this patch only fix half of the
> problem seen in OSSTest?
Saving to image new xl format (info 0x3/0x0/1797)
xc: info: In experimental xc_domain_save2
xc: info: Saving domain 2, type x86 HVM
xc: progress: Memory: 67584/1344513 5%
xc: progress: Memory: 135168/1344513 10%
xc: progress: Memory: 201728/1344513 15%
xc: progress: Memory: 269312/1344513 20%
xc: progress: Memory: 336896/1344513 25%
xc: progress: Memory: 403456/1344513 30%
xc: progress: Memory: 471040/1344513 35%
xc: progress: Memory: 538624/1344513 40%
xc: progress: Memory: 605184/1344513 45%
xc: progress: Memory: 672768/1344513 50%
xc: progress: Memory: 740352/1344513 55%
xc: error: xc_map_foreign_bulk: mmap failed (12 = Cannot allocate
memory): Internal error
xc: error: Failed to map guest pages (12 = Cannot allocate memory):
Internal error
xc: error: Save failed (12 = Cannot allocate memory): Internal error
libxl: error: libxl_stream_write.c:267:libxl__xc_domain_save_done:
saving domain: domain responded to suspend request: Cannot allocate memory
xl: libxl_event.c:1866: libxl__ao_inprogress_gc: Assertion
`!ao->complete' failed.
I don't know why xc_map_foreign_bulk() failed, but at a guess I would
day dom0 is out of RAM.
This patch fixes the libxl assertion.
~Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-23 11:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-23 11:09 [PATCH] tools/libxl: Fixes to stream v2 task joining logic Andrew Cooper
2015-07-23 11:38 ` Wei Liu
2015-07-23 11:42 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2015-07-23 12:03 ` Wei Liu
2015-07-23 13:07 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-23 14:02 ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-24 11:41 ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-27 14:30 ` Andrew Cooper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55B0D321.6000000@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).