From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Cc: Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@citrix.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>, Feng Wu <feng.wu@intel.com>,
GeorgeDunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>,
Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: vmx: VT-d posted-interrupt core logic handling
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 06:24:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56E1838702000078000DB45B@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56E157A6.4060909@citrix.com>
>>> On 10.03.16 at 12:16, <david.vrabel@citrix.com> wrote:
> On 10/03/16 10:46, George Dunlap wrote:
>> On 10/03/16 10:35, David Vrabel wrote:
>>> You could also consider only waking the first N VCPUs and just making
>>> the rest runnable. If you wake more VCPUs than PCPUs at the same time
>>> most of them won't actually be scheduled.
>>
>> "Waking" a vcpu means "changing from blocked to runnable", so those two
>> things are the same. And I can't figure out what you mean instead --
>> can you elaborate?
>>
>> Waking up 1000 vcpus is going to take strictly more time than checking
>> whether there's a PI interrupt pending on 1000 vcpus to see if they need
>> to be woken up.
>
> Waking means making it runnable /and/ attempt to make it running.
>
> So I mean, for the > N'th VCPU don't call __runq_tickle(), only call
> __runq_insert().
We expect only some (hopefully small) percentage of the vCPU-s
on the list to actually need unblocking anyway. As George said,
list traversal alone can be an issue here, and we can't stop going
through the list half way. The case where a large portion of the
vCPU-s on the list actually need waking up would be even more
worrying.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-10 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-29 3:00 [PATCH v14 0/2] Add VT-d Posted-Interrupts support Feng Wu
2016-02-29 3:00 ` [PATCH v14 1/2] vmx: VT-d posted-interrupt core logic handling Feng Wu
2016-02-29 13:33 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-29 13:52 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-03-01 5:39 ` Wu, Feng
2016-03-01 9:24 ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-01 10:16 ` George Dunlap
2016-03-01 13:06 ` Wu, Feng
2016-03-01 5:24 ` Tian, Kevin
2016-03-01 5:39 ` Wu, Feng
2016-03-04 22:00 ` Ideas " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-03-07 11:21 ` George Dunlap
2016-03-07 15:53 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-03-07 16:19 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-03-07 20:23 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-03-08 12:02 ` George Dunlap
2016-03-08 13:10 ` Wu, Feng
2016-03-08 14:42 ` George Dunlap
2016-03-08 15:42 ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-08 17:05 ` George Dunlap
2016-03-08 17:26 ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-08 18:38 ` George Dunlap
2016-03-09 5:06 ` Wu, Feng
2016-03-09 13:39 ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-09 16:01 ` George Dunlap
2016-03-09 16:31 ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-09 16:23 ` On setting clear criteria for declaring a feature acceptable (was "vmx: VT-d posted-interrupt core logic handling") George Dunlap
2016-03-09 16:58 ` On setting clear criteria for declaring a feature acceptable Jan Beulich
2016-03-09 18:02 ` On setting clear criteria for declaring a feature acceptable (was "vmx: VT-d posted-interrupt core logic handling") David Vrabel
2016-03-10 1:15 ` Wu, Feng
2016-03-10 9:30 ` George Dunlap
2016-03-10 5:09 ` Tian, Kevin
2016-03-10 8:07 ` vmx: VT-d posted-interrupt core logic handling Jan Beulich
2016-03-10 8:43 ` Tian, Kevin
2016-03-10 9:05 ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-10 9:20 ` Tian, Kevin
2016-03-10 10:05 ` Tian, Kevin
2016-03-10 10:18 ` Jan Beulich
2016-03-10 10:35 ` David Vrabel
2016-03-10 10:46 ` George Dunlap
2016-03-10 11:16 ` David Vrabel
2016-03-10 11:49 ` George Dunlap
2016-03-10 13:24 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2016-03-10 11:00 ` George Dunlap
2016-03-10 11:21 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-03-10 13:36 ` Wu, Feng
2016-05-17 13:27 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-05-19 7:22 ` Wu, Feng
2016-03-10 10:41 ` George Dunlap
2016-03-09 5:22 ` Ideas Re: [PATCH v14 1/2] " Wu, Feng
2016-03-09 11:25 ` George Dunlap
2016-03-09 12:06 ` Wu, Feng
2016-02-29 3:00 ` [PATCH v14 2/2] Add a command line parameter for VT-d posted-interrupts Feng Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56E1838702000078000DB45B@prv-mh.provo.novell.com \
--to=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=feng.wu@intel.com \
--cc=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=lars.kurth@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).