From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>
Cc: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: Xen-unstable 4.8: HVM domain_crash called from emulate.c:144 RIP: c000:[<000000000000336a>]
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 12:46:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5761865B.6040808@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5761963D02000078000F56FF@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
On 06/15/2016 11:54 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> Yes, albeit two then isn't enough either if we want to fully address
> the basic issue here: We'd have to latch as many translations as
> there are possibly pages involved in the execution of a single
> instruction.
Re: translations changing under us --- can't they change between guest
issuing two STOS instructions and the emulator picking up the latched
one (from the first instruction) when emulating the second?
-boris
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-15 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-14 23:49 Xen-unstable 4.8: HVM domain_crash called from emulate.c:144 RIP: c000:[<000000000000336a>] linux
2016-06-15 8:29 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-15 8:57 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2016-06-15 9:38 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2016-06-15 10:12 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-15 12:00 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2016-06-15 12:48 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-15 13:58 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2016-06-15 14:07 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-15 14:20 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-06-15 14:32 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-06-15 14:39 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-15 14:56 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-06-15 15:22 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-15 15:29 ` Paul Durrant
2016-06-15 15:43 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-15 15:46 ` Paul Durrant
2016-06-15 15:54 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-15 16:46 ` Boris Ostrovsky [this message]
2016-06-16 8:03 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-15 14:35 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5761865B.6040808@oracle.com \
--to=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=Paul.Durrant@citrix.com \
--cc=linux@eikelenboom.it \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).