From: Bertrand Marquis <Bertrand.Marquis@arm.com>
To: Luca Fancellu <Luca.Fancellu@arm.com>
Cc: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
"Ian Jackson" <iwj@xenproject.org>,
"Rahul Singh" <Rahul.Singh@arm.com>,
"Stefano Stabellini" <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
"Julien Grall" <julien@xen.org>,
"Volodymyr Babchuk" <Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com>,
"Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
"George Dunlap" <george.dunlap@citrix.com>,
"Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@suse.com>, "Wei Liu" <wl@xen.org>,
"Paul Durrant" <paul@xen.org>,
"Oleksandr Andrushchenko" <Oleksandr_Andrushchenko@epam.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/3] xen/arm: Enable the existing x86 virtual PCI support for ARM.
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 10:17:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <B67603A1-A4B0-4D7D-9787-4DA7050336D2@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E80D6A5A-2556-49C4-A9F0-E85CCD44D1A8@arm.com>
Hi Luca,
> On 15 Oct 2021, at 11:13, Luca Fancellu <Luca.Fancellu@arm.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 15 Oct 2021, at 10:52, Bertrand Marquis <Bertrand.Marquis@arm.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Roger,
>>
>>> On 15 Oct 2021, at 09:32, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 03:49:50PM +0100, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>>>> From: Rahul Singh <rahul.singh@arm.com>
>>>>
>>>> The existing VPCI support available for X86 is adapted for Arm.
>>>> When the device is added to XEN via the hyper call
>>>> “PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_add”, VPCI handler for the config space
>>>> access is added to the Xen to emulate the PCI devices config space.
>>>>
>>>> A MMIO trap handler for the PCI ECAM space is registered in XEN
>>>> so that when guest is trying to access the PCI config space,XEN
>>>> will trap the access and emulate read/write using the VPCI and
>>>> not the real PCI hardware.
>>>>
>>>> For Dom0less systems scan_pci_devices() would be used to discover the
>>>> PCI device in XEN and VPCI handler will be added during XEN boots.
>>>>
>>>> This patch is also doing some small fixes to fix compilation errors on
>>>> arm32 of vpci:
>>>> - add a cast to unsigned long in print in header.c
>>>> - add a cast to uint64_t in vpci_ecam_mmio_write
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Rahul Singh <rahul.singh@arm.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marquis@arm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> Changes in v6:
>>>> - Use new vpci_ecam_ helpers for PCI access
>>>> - Do not set XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_vpci for dom0 for now (will be done in a
>>>> future patch once everything is ready)
>>>
>>> Isn't the series missing a revert of XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_vpci? I think
>>> that's what we agreed would be the way forward.
>>
>> A separate reverse patch for that has already been merged:
>> https://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=commit;h=9516d01ac3015f522528ed6dafb3f584eaa7ed2c
>>
>>>
>>>> - rename REGISTER_OFFSET to ECAM_REG_OFFSET and move it to pci.h
>>>> - remove not needed local variables in vpci_mmio_write, the one in read
>>>> has been kept to ensure proper compilation on arm32
>>>> - move call to vpci_add_handlers before iommu init to simplify exit path
>>>> - move call to pci_cleanup_msi in the out section of pci_add_device if
>>>> pdev is not NULL and on error
>>>> - initialize pdev to NULL to handle properly exit path call of
>>>> pci_cleanup_msi
>>>> - keep has_vpci to return false for now as CFG_vpci has been removed.
>>>> Added a comment on top of the definition.
>>>> - fix compilation errors on arm32 (print in header.c, cast missing in
>>>> mmio_write.
>>>> - local variable was kept in vpci_mmio_read on arm to prevent a cast
>>>> error in arm32.
>>>> Change in v5:
>>>> - Add pci_cleanup_msi(pdev) incleanup part.
>>>> - Added Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
>>>> Change in v4:
>>>> - Move addition of XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_vpci flag to separate patch
>>>> Change in v3:
>>>> - Use is_pci_passthrough_enabled() in place of pci_passthrough_enabled variable
>>>> - Reject XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_vpci for x86 in arch_sanitise_domain_config()
>>>> - Remove IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAS_VPCI) from has_vpci()
>>>> Change in v2:
>>>> - Add new XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_vpci flag
>>>> - modify has_vpci() to include XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_vpci
>>>> - enable vpci support when pci-passthough option is enabled.
>>>> ---
>>>> ---
>>>> xen/arch/arm/Makefile | 1 +
>>>> xen/arch/arm/domain.c | 4 ++
>>>> xen/arch/arm/vpci.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> xen/arch/arm/vpci.h | 36 +++++++++++++++++
>>>> xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c | 18 ++++++++-
>>>> xen/drivers/vpci/header.c | 3 +-
>>>> xen/drivers/vpci/vpci.c | 2 +-
>>>> xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h | 1 +
>>>> xen/include/asm-x86/pci.h | 2 -
>>>> xen/include/public/arch-arm.h | 7 ++++
>>>> xen/include/xen/pci.h | 3 ++
>>>> 11 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>> create mode 100644 xen/arch/arm/vpci.c
>>>> create mode 100644 xen/arch/arm/vpci.h
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/Makefile b/xen/arch/arm/Makefile
>>>> index 64518848b2..07f634508e 100644
>>>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/Makefile
>>>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/Makefile
>>>> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ ifneq ($(CONFIG_NO_PLAT),y)
>>>> obj-y += platforms/
>>>> endif
>>>> obj-$(CONFIG_TEE) += tee/
>>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_HAS_VPCI) += vpci.o
>>>>
>>>> obj-$(CONFIG_HAS_ALTERNATIVE) += alternative.o
>>>> obj-y += bootfdt.init.o
>>>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain.c
>>>> index eef0661beb..96e1b23550 100644
>>>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/domain.c
>>>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain.c
>>>> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
>>>> #include <asm/vgic.h>
>>>> #include <asm/vtimer.h>
>>>>
>>>> +#include "vpci.h"
>>>> #include "vuart.h"
>>>>
>>>> DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct vcpu *, curr_vcpu);
>>>> @@ -773,6 +774,9 @@ int arch_domain_create(struct domain *d,
>>>> if ( is_hardware_domain(d) && (rc = domain_vuart_init(d)) )
>>>> goto fail;
>>>>
>>>> + if ( (rc = domain_vpci_init(d)) != 0 )
>>>> + goto fail;
>>>> +
>>>> return 0;
>>>>
>>>> fail:
>>>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vpci.c b/xen/arch/arm/vpci.c
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 0000000000..7c3552b65d
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vpci.c
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * xen/arch/arm/vpci.c
>>>> + *
>>>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>>>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
>>>> + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
>>>> + * (at your option) any later version.
>>>> + *
>>>> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>>>> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>>>> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
>>>> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
>>>> + */
>>>> +#include <xen/sched.h>
>>>> +#include <xen/vpci.h>
>>>> +
>>>> +#include <asm/mmio.h>
>>>> +
>>>> +static int vpci_mmio_read(struct vcpu *v, mmio_info_t *info,
>>>> + register_t *r, void *p)
>>>> +{
>>>> + pci_sbdf_t sbdf;
>>>> + /* data is needed to prevent a pointer cast on 32bit */
>>>> + unsigned long data = ~0ul;
>>>> + int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + /* We ignore segment part and always handle segment 0 */
>>>> + sbdf.sbdf = ECAM_BDF(info->gpa);
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = vpci_ecam_mmio_read(sbdf, ECAM_REG_OFFSET(info->gpa),
>>>> + 1U << info->dabt.size, &data);
>>>> +
>>>> + *r = data;
>>>> +
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int vpci_mmio_write(struct vcpu *v, mmio_info_t *info,
>>>> + register_t r, void *p)
>>>> +{
>>>> + pci_sbdf_t sbdf;
>>>> +
>>>> + /* We ignore segment part and always handle segment 0 */
>>>> + sbdf.sbdf = ECAM_BDF(info->gpa);
>>>> +
>>>> + return vpci_ecam_mmio_write(sbdf, ECAM_REG_OFFSET(info->gpa),
>>>> + 1U << info->dabt.size, r);
>>>> +}
>>>
>>> I'm not sure returning an error value here is helpful, as I'm not sure
>>> how native Arm behaves and how this error is propagated into the
>>> guest. FWIWreturning ~0 or dropping writes is what we do in x86 when
>>> vPCI is not capable of handling the access.
>>
>> Mmio handlers can take a return code on arm if something did not work
>> so I think this is the right way to do it on arm.
>> Now has agreed with Jan, we will change the return type of
>> vpci_ecam_write (also renamed) to be a boolean.
>>
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> +static const struct mmio_handler_ops vpci_mmio_handler = {
>>>> + .read = vpci_mmio_read,
>>>> + .write = vpci_mmio_write,
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +int domain_vpci_init(struct domain *d)
>>>> +{
>>>> + if ( !has_vpci(d) )
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +
>>>> + register_mmio_handler(d, &vpci_mmio_handler,
>>>> + GUEST_VPCI_ECAM_BASE, GUEST_VPCI_ECAM_SIZE, NULL);
>>>> +
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * Local variables:
>>>> + * mode: C
>>>> + * c-file-style: "BSD"
>>>> + * c-basic-offset: 4
>>>> + * indent-tabs-mode: nil
>>>> + * End:
>>>> + */
>>>> +
>>>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vpci.h b/xen/arch/arm/vpci.h
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 0000000000..d8a7b0e3e8
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vpci.h
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * xen/arch/arm/vpci.h
>>>> + *
>>>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>>>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
>>>> + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
>>>> + * (at your option) any later version.
>>>> + *
>>>> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>>>> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>>>> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
>>>> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
>>>> + */
>>>> +
>>>> +#ifndef __ARCH_ARM_VPCI_H__
>>>> +#define __ARCH_ARM_VPCI_H__
>>>> +
>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_VPCI
>>>> +int domain_vpci_init(struct domain *d);
>>>> +#else
>>>> +static inline int domain_vpci_init(struct domain *d)
>>>> +{
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +#endif
>>>> +
>>>> +#endif /* __ARCH_ARM_VPCI_H__ */
>>>> +
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * Local variables:
>>>> + * mode: C
>>>> + * c-file-style: "BSD"
>>>> + * c-basic-offset: 4
>>>> + * indent-tabs-mode: nil
>>>> + * End:
>>>> + */
>>>> diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c
>>>> index 3aa8c3175f..8cc529ecec 100644
>>>> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c
>>>> +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c
>>>> @@ -658,7 +658,7 @@ int pci_add_device(u16 seg, u8 bus, u8 devfn,
>>>> const struct pci_dev_info *info, nodeid_t node)
>>>> {
>>>> struct pci_seg *pseg;
>>>> - struct pci_dev *pdev;
>>>> + struct pci_dev *pdev = NULL;
>>>> unsigned int slot = PCI_SLOT(devfn), func = PCI_FUNC(devfn);
>>>> const char *pdev_type;
>>>> int ret;
>>>> @@ -752,6 +752,19 @@ int pci_add_device(u16 seg, u8 bus, u8 devfn,
>>>>
>>>> check_pdev(pdev);
>>>>
>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * On ARM PCI devices discovery will be done by Dom0. Add vpci handler when
>>>> + * Dom0 inform XEN to add the PCI devices in XEN.
>>>> + */
>>>> + ret = vpci_add_handlers(pdev);
>>>> + if ( ret )
>>>> + {
>>>> + printk(XENLOG_ERR "Setup of vPCI failed: %d\n", ret);
>>>> + goto out;
>>>> + }
>>>> +#endif
>>>
>>> I think vpci_add_handlers should be called after checking that
>>> pdev->domain is != NULL, so I would move this chunk a bit below.
>>
>> On arm this would prevent the dom0less use case or to have the PCI
>> bus enumerated from an other domain.
>> @oleksandr: can you comment on this one, you might have a better
>> answer than me on this ?
>
> For my understanding, as also Jan pointed out, this should be put inside the
> If ( !pdev->domain ) because also as the comment suggests, this operation
> should be performed only when there is a Dom0 and when we are using
> a dom0less setup the pdev->domain should be NULL if I’m not wrong.
> @oleksandr maybe can confirm
You are right.
I will fix that and move that into an if.
Regards
Bertrand
>
>>
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> ret = 0;
>>>> if ( !pdev->domain )
>>>> {
>>>> @@ -784,6 +797,9 @@ out:
>>>> &PCI_SBDF(seg, bus, slot, func));
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>> + else if ( pdev )
>>>> + pci_cleanup_msi(pdev);
>>>
>>> I'm slightly lost at why you add this chunk, is this strictly related
>>> to the patch?
>>
>> This was discussed a lot in previous version of the patch and
>> requested by Stefano. The idea here is that as soon as handlers
>> are added some bits might be modified in the PCI config space
>> leading possibly to msi interrupts. So it is safer to cleanup on the
>> error path. For references please see discussion on v4 and v5 where
>> this was actually added (to much references as the discussion was
>> long so here [1] and [2] are the patchwork thread).
>>
>> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/xen-devel/patch/9bdca2cda5d2e83f94dc2423e55714273539760a.1633540842.git.rahul.singh@arm.com/
>> [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/xen-devel/patch/f093de681c2560a7196895bcd666ef8840885c1d.1633340795.git.rahul.singh@arm.com/
>>
>> Regards
>> Bertrand
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-15 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 190+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-06 17:40 [PATCH v5 00/11] PCI devices passthrough on Arm Rahul Singh
2021-10-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v5 01/11] xen/arm: xc_domain_ioport_permission(..) not supported on ARM Rahul Singh
2021-10-11 11:47 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-11 12:11 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-11 13:20 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-11 13:40 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-11 13:57 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-11 14:16 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-11 16:32 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-11 17:11 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-12 8:29 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-12 8:41 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-12 9:32 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-12 9:38 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-10-12 10:01 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-12 10:06 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-10-12 10:20 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-12 10:41 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-12 10:44 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-12 14:53 ` Ian Jackson
2021-10-12 16:15 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-12 16:29 ` Ian Jackson
2021-10-12 20:42 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-13 8:07 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-13 11:52 ` Ian Jackson
2021-10-13 8:02 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-13 12:02 ` Ian Jackson
2021-10-12 9:40 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-12 10:03 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-11 14:16 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-10-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v5 02/11] xen/arm: Add PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_(*add/remove) support for ARM Rahul Singh
2021-10-07 0:05 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-07 12:58 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-21 9:28 ` xen/arm: Missing appropriate locking for the IOMMU (WAS Re: [PATCH v5 02/11] xen/arm: Add PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_(*add/remove) support for ARM) Julien Grall
2021-10-21 13:15 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-21 13:47 ` Julien Grall
2021-10-21 13:52 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v5 03/11] xen/arm: Add cmdline boot option "pci-passthrough = <boolean>" Rahul Singh
2021-10-07 8:27 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-07 8:32 ` Rahul Singh
2021-10-07 12:59 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v5 04/11] xen/arm: PCI host bridge discovery within XEN on ARM Rahul Singh
2021-10-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v5 05/11] xen/arm: Add support for Xilinx ZynqMP PCI host controller Rahul Singh
2021-10-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v5 06/11] xen/arm: Implement pci access functions Rahul Singh
2021-10-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v5 07/11] xen/domctl: Introduce XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_vpci flag Rahul Singh
2021-10-07 13:08 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-08 18:06 ` Andrew Cooper
2021-10-08 21:12 ` Julien Grall
2021-10-08 21:46 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-11 9:24 ` Julien Grall
2021-10-11 11:29 ` Michal Orzel
2021-10-11 11:35 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-11 13:17 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-11 9:48 ` Ian Jackson
2021-10-11 9:27 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-11 12:06 ` Michal Orzel
2021-10-12 10:38 ` Michal Orzel
2021-10-13 8:30 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-13 9:36 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-13 10:56 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-13 12:11 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-13 12:57 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-13 20:41 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-14 6:23 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-14 7:53 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-13 14:28 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-13 20:53 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-13 23:21 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-12 21:48 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-13 6:18 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-13 7:11 ` Michal Orzel
2021-10-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v5 08/11] xen/arm: Enable the existing x86 virtual PCI support for ARM Rahul Singh
2021-10-07 13:43 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-11 12:41 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-11 13:09 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-11 13:34 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-11 14:10 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-11 14:52 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-11 18:18 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-12 8:04 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-12 21:37 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-13 6:10 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-13 10:02 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-13 12:21 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-12 15:04 ` Julien Grall
2021-10-12 16:12 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-12 16:20 ` Julien Grall
2021-10-12 17:50 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-11 10:51 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-11 16:12 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-11 16:20 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-10-11 16:43 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-11 17:15 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-11 18:30 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-10-11 19:27 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-12 5:34 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-10-12 7:44 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-12 14:32 ` Julien Grall
2021-10-12 14:34 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-13 8:45 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-13 9:48 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-13 10:33 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-13 13:00 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-13 14:51 ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2021-10-13 15:15 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-13 19:27 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-14 6:33 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-14 7:53 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-14 9:03 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-14 9:24 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v5 09/11] xen/arm: Transitional change to build HAS_VPCI on ARM Rahul Singh
2021-10-11 11:43 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-11 12:15 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-12 1:32 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v5 10/11] arm/libxl: Emulated PCI device tree node in libxl Rahul Singh
2021-10-06 18:01 ` Julien Grall
2021-10-07 0:26 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-07 15:31 ` Rahul Singh
2021-10-07 10:53 ` Ian Jackson
2021-10-07 15:29 ` Rahul Singh
2021-10-07 16:11 ` Ian Jackson
2021-10-11 13:46 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-14 17:16 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-14 14:49 ` [PATCH v6 0/3] PCI devices passthrough on Arm Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-14 14:49 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] xen/vpci: Move ecam access functions to common code Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-14 16:06 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-14 17:09 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15 6:29 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-15 7:37 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15 8:13 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-15 8:20 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15 8:24 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-15 9:49 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-14 23:47 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-15 7:44 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-15 7:53 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15 9:53 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-15 10:12 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15 10:14 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-14 14:49 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] xen/arm: Enable the existing x86 virtual PCI support for ARM Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-14 23:49 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-15 6:40 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-15 9:59 ` Ian Jackson
2021-10-15 10:10 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15 8:00 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-15 10:09 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15 10:14 ` Ian Jackson
2021-10-15 10:18 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-15 11:35 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-15 12:13 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15 12:18 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-15 12:28 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15 13:00 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-15 13:10 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15 10:38 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-15 8:32 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-15 8:42 ` Michal Orzel
2021-10-15 9:52 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15 10:13 ` Luca Fancellu
2021-10-15 10:17 ` Bertrand Marquis [this message]
2021-10-15 10:19 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-15 10:31 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15 10:24 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-15 10:33 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15 10:41 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-15 10:48 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15 10:51 ` Jan Beulich
2021-10-15 11:08 ` Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-15 13:47 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-15 14:00 ` Luca Fancellu
2021-10-15 14:32 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-10-14 14:49 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] arm/libxl: Emulated PCI device tree node in libxl Bertrand Marquis
2021-10-14 17:54 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] arm/libxl: Emulated PCI device tree node in libxl [and 1 more messages] Ian Jackson
2021-10-14 23:50 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-15 7:28 ` Julien Grall
2021-10-15 7:41 ` Michal Orzel
2021-10-15 9:01 ` Julien Grall
2021-10-15 10:02 ` Ian Jackson
2021-10-15 10:58 ` Michal Orzel
2021-10-15 11:04 ` Michal Orzel
2021-10-15 11:46 ` Ian Jackson
2021-10-15 11:53 ` Michal Orzel
2021-10-15 12:10 ` Julien Grall
2021-10-15 12:14 ` Ian Jackson
2021-10-15 12:13 ` Ian Jackson
2021-10-12 15:03 ` [PATCH v5 10/11] arm/libxl: Emulated PCI device tree node in libxl Ian Jackson
2021-10-06 17:40 ` [PATCH v5 11/11] xen/arm: Add linux,pci-domain property for hwdom if not available Rahul Singh
2021-10-13 20:54 ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-07 19:54 ` [PATCH v5 00/11] PCI devices passthrough on Arm Stefano Stabellini
2021-10-07 21:29 ` Rahul Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=B67603A1-A4B0-4D7D-9787-4DA7050336D2@arm.com \
--to=bertrand.marquis@arm.com \
--cc=Luca.Fancellu@arm.com \
--cc=Oleksandr_Andrushchenko@epam.com \
--cc=Rahul.Singh@arm.com \
--cc=Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
--cc=iwj@xenproject.org \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=julien@xen.org \
--cc=paul@xen.org \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=wl@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).