xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>
To: Tianyang Chen <tiche@seas.upenn.edu>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>,
	Meng Xu <mengxu@cis.upenn.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] xen: sched: rtds refactor code
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 16:51:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFLBxZYu2qZPqX3D6D2Rv3A_p5KW2D2vfs9usG2eH08yqgSF_w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1463356490-9780-2-git-send-email-tiche@seas.upenn.edu>

On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 12:54 AM, Tianyang Chen <tiche@seas.upenn.edu> wrote:
> No functional change:
>  -Various coding style fix
>  -Added comments for UPDATE_LIMIT_SHIFT.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tianyang Chen <tiche@seas.upenn.edu>

Hey Tianyang,

The changes here for the most part look good (with a few comments --
see below), but the title and changelog could use some work.

For one, you're not actually doing any refactoring -- I'd call this
patch a "clean-up" patch.

Secondly, you should go through and enumerate the different clean-ups
you do.  For instance, you mention why you remove the __ at the head
of functions in your cover letter, but you don't mention it here.

> ---
>  xen/common/sched_rt.c |  106 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>  1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/common/sched_rt.c b/xen/common/sched_rt.c
> index 7f8f411..1584d53 100644
> --- a/xen/common/sched_rt.c
> +++ b/xen/common/sched_rt.c
> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@
>   * in schedule.c
>   *
>   * The functions involes RunQ and needs to grab locks are:
> - *    vcpu_insert, vcpu_remove, context_saved, __runq_insert
> + *    vcpu_insert, vcpu_remove, context_saved, runq_insert
>   */
>
>
> @@ -107,6 +107,12 @@
>   */
>  #define RTDS_MIN_BUDGET     (MICROSECS(10))
>
> +/*
> + * UPDATE_LIMIT_SHIT: a constant used in rt_update_deadline(). When finding

Missing an 'F'. :-)

> + * the next deadline, performing addition could be faster if the difference
> + * between cur_deadline and now is small. If the difference is bigger than
> + * 1024 * period, use multiplication.
> + */
>  #define UPDATE_LIMIT_SHIFT      10
>
>  /*
> @@ -158,25 +164,25 @@
>  static void repl_timer_handler(void *data);
>
>  /*
> - * Systme-wide private data, include global RunQueue/DepletedQ
> + * System-wide private data, include global RunQueue/DepletedQ
>   * Global lock is referenced by schedule_data.schedule_lock from all
>   * physical cpus. It can be grabbed via vcpu_schedule_lock_irq()
>   */
>  struct rt_private {
> -    spinlock_t lock;            /* the global coarse grand lock */
> -    struct list_head sdom;      /* list of availalbe domains, used for dump */
> -    struct list_head runq;      /* ordered list of runnable vcpus */
> -    struct list_head depletedq; /* unordered list of depleted vcpus */
> -    struct list_head replq;     /* ordered list of vcpus that need replenishment */
> -    cpumask_t tickled;          /* cpus been tickled */
> -    struct timer *repl_timer;   /* replenishment timer */
> +    spinlock_t lock;             /* the global coarse grand lock */

* course-grained

Also, I'm not sure what the point of indenting all these comments out
an extra space is.  I don't object, of course, if Meng doesn't object,
but at very least it could use a one-line explanation in the
changelog.

Otherwise, looks good, thanks.

 -George

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-06-22 16:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-15 23:54 [PATCH 0/2] xen: sched: rtds refactor code Tianyang Chen
2016-05-15 23:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Tianyang Chen
2016-05-17 15:06   ` Meng Xu
2016-06-22 15:51   ` George Dunlap [this message]
2016-06-22 16:16     ` Meng Xu
2016-06-23 10:42       ` George Dunlap
2016-06-24  7:45         ` Dario Faggioli
2016-06-24 11:36           ` Meng Xu
2016-05-15 23:54 ` [PATCH 2/2] xen: sched: rtds: use non-atomic bit-ops Tianyang Chen
2016-05-17 15:08   ` Meng Xu
2016-05-17 15:05 ` [PATCH 0/2] xen: sched: rtds refactor code Meng Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAFLBxZYu2qZPqX3D6D2Rv3A_p5KW2D2vfs9usG2eH08yqgSF_w@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
    --cc=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
    --cc=mengxu@cis.upenn.edu \
    --cc=tiche@seas.upenn.edu \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).