xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Wu, Feng" <feng.wu@intel.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	"keir@xen.org" <keir@xen.org>,
	"george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com" <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
	"andrew.cooper3@citrix.com" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	"dario.faggioli@citrix.com" <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
	"Wu, Feng" <feng.wu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] VMX: Cleanup PI per-cpu blocking list when vcpu is destroyed
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 10:22:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E959C4978C3B6342920538CF579893F0197009ED@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57486C8202000078000EF3E6@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@suse.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 9:49 PM
> To: Wu, Feng <feng.wu@intel.com>
> Cc: andrew.cooper3@citrix.com; dario.faggioli@citrix.com;
> george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com; Tian, Kevin <kevin.tian@intel.com>; xen-
> devel@lists.xen.org; konrad.wilk@oracle.com; keir@xen.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] VMX: Cleanup PI per-cpu blocking list when vcpu is
> destroyed
> 
> >>> On 26.05.16 at 15:39, <feng.wu@intel.com> wrote:
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
> > @@ -366,6 +366,7 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_destroy(struct vcpu *v)
> >      vmx_destroy_vmcs(v);
> >      vpmu_destroy(v);
> >      passive_domain_destroy(v);
> > +    vmx_pi_blocking_cleanup(v);
> >  }
> 
> Isn't this redundant with the cleanup done when the last device
> gets removed (via pci_release_devices()) during domain cleanup?

We need to handle the following two cases:
- the last device gets removed (via 'xl pci-detach ...'), and the guest
is running after that. The logical in vmx_pi_hooks_deassign() cover
this case.
- the guest is shutting down. It is covered here.

Thanks,
Feng

> 
> Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-31 10:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-26 13:39 [PATCH v2 0/4] VMX: Properly handle pi descriptor and per-cpu blocking list Feng Wu
2016-05-26 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] VMX: Properly handle pi when all the assigned devices are removed Feng Wu
2016-05-27 13:43   ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-31 10:22     ` Wu, Feng
2016-05-31 11:52       ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-03  5:12         ` Wu, Feng
2016-06-03  9:45           ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-26 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] VMX: Cleanup PI per-cpu blocking list when vcpu is destroyed Feng Wu
2016-05-27 13:49   ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-31 10:22     ` Wu, Feng [this message]
2016-05-31 11:54       ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-26 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] VMX: Assign the right value to 'NDST' field in a concern case Feng Wu
2016-05-27 14:00   ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-31 10:27     ` Wu, Feng
2016-05-31 11:58       ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-03  5:23         ` Wu, Feng
2016-06-03  9:57           ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-22 18:00   ` George Dunlap
2016-06-24  9:08     ` Wu, Feng
2016-05-26 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] VMX: fixup PI descritpor when cpu is offline Feng Wu
2016-05-27 14:56   ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-31 10:31     ` Wu, Feng
2016-06-22 18:33       ` George Dunlap
2016-06-24  6:34         ` Wu, Feng
2016-05-26 17:20 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] VMX: Properly handle pi descriptor and per-cpu blocking list Dario Faggioli
2016-05-31 10:19   ` Wu, Feng
2016-06-22 21:33     ` Dario Faggioli
2016-06-24  6:33       ` Wu, Feng
2016-06-24 10:29         ` Dario Faggioli
2016-06-24 13:42           ` Wu, Feng
2016-06-24 13:49             ` George Dunlap
2016-06-24 14:36               ` Dario Faggioli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E959C4978C3B6342920538CF579893F0197009ED@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=feng.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
    --cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=keir@xen.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).