From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
"M. Vefa Bicakci" <m.v.b@runbox.com>, "Wei Liu" <wl@xen.org>,
"Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/S3: put data segment registers into known state upon resume
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 17:00:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e61e34c4-38dd-d201-8035-ead79a7595c2@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c726cdc7-271b-0ea7-4056-8ab86686282e@suse.com>
On 23/07/2020 16:19, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 23.07.2020 16:40, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 20/07/2020 16:20, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> wakeup_32 sets %ds and %es to BOOT_DS, while leaving %fs at what
>>> wakeup_start did set it to, and %gs at whatever BIOS did load into it.
>>> All of this may end up confusing the first load_segments() to run on
>>> the BSP after resume, in particular allowing a non-nul selector value
>>> to be left in %fs.
>>>
>>> Alongside %ss, also put all other data segment registers into the same
>>> state that the boot and CPU bringup paths put them in.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: M. Vefa Bicakci <m.v.b@runbox.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
>>>
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/wakeup_prot.S
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/wakeup_prot.S
>>> @@ -52,6 +52,16 @@ ENTRY(s3_resume)
>>> mov %eax, %ss
>>> mov saved_rsp(%rip), %rsp
>>>
>>> + /*
>>> + * Also put other segment registers into known state, like would
>>> + * be done on the boot path. This is in particular necessary for
>>> + * the first load_segments() to work as intended.
>>> + */
>> I don't think the comment is helpful, not least because it refers to a
>> broken behaviour in load_segemnts() which is soon going to change anyway.
> Well, I can drop it. I merely thought I'd be nice and comment my
> code once in a while (and the comment could be dropped / adjusted
> when load_segments() changes)...
>
>> We've literally just loaded the GDT, at which point reloading all
>> segments *is* the expected thing to do.
> In a way, unless some/all are assumed to already hold a nul selector.
>
>> I'd recommend that the diff be simply:
>>
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/wakeup_prot.S
>> b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/wakeup_prot.S
>> index dcc7e2327d..a2c41c4f3f 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/wakeup_prot.S
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/wakeup_prot.S
>> @@ -49,6 +49,10 @@ ENTRY(s3_resume)
>> mov %rax, %cr0
>>
>> mov $__HYPERVISOR_DS64, %eax
>> + mov %eax, %ds
>> + mov %eax, %es
>> + mov %eax, %fs
>> + mov %eax, %gs
>> mov %eax, %ss
>> mov saved_rsp(%rip), %rsp
> So I had specifically elected to not put the addition there, to make
> sure the stack would get established first. But seeing both Roger
> and you ask me to do otherwise - well, so be it then.
There is no IDT. Any fault is will be triple, irrespective of the exact
code layout.
This sequence actually matches what we have in __high_start().
I don't think it is wise to write code which presumes that
__HYPERVISOR_DS64 is 0 (it happens to be, but could easily be 0xe010 as
well), or that the trampoline has fixed behaviours for the segments.
~Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-23 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-20 15:20 [PATCH] x86/S3: put data segment registers into known state upon resume Jan Beulich
2020-07-21 11:27 ` Roger Pau Monné
2020-07-23 14:40 ` Andrew Cooper
2020-07-23 15:19 ` Jan Beulich
2020-07-23 16:00 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2020-07-29 23:29 ` M. Vefa Bicakci
2020-07-29 23:31 ` Andrew Cooper
2020-07-29 23:38 ` M. Vefa Bicakci
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e61e34c4-38dd-d201-8035-ead79a7595c2@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=m.v.b@runbox.com \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=wl@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).