All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Cc: "Felipe Contreras" <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>,
	"Johannes Schindelin" <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
	"Jeff King" <peff@peff.net>,
	"Git Mailing List" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Johannes Sixt" <j6t@kdbg.org>,
	"Sergey Organov" <sorganov@gmail.com>,
	"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xdiff: implement a zealous diff3
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 13:03:40 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqr1h3wz8j.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABPp-BFY7uU5Ugypv4xCHq+XHTc3UROWPdV1v-JbN7xBycDZTA@mail.gmail.com> (Elijah Newren's message of "Mon, 14 Jun 2021 20:43:54 -0700")

Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> writes:

> This is going to sound harsh, but people shouldn't waste (any more)
> time reviewing the patches in this thread or the "merge: cleanups and
> fix" series submitted elsewhere.  They should all just be rejected.
>
> I do not think it is reasonable to expect reviewers to spend time
> responding to re-posted patches when:
>   * no attempt was made to make sure they were up-to-date with current
> code beyond compiling (see below)
>   * no attempt was made to address missing items pointed out in
> response to the original submission[1]
>   * no attempt was made to handle or even test particular cases
> pointed out in response to the original submission (see [1] and below)
>   * the patches were posted despite knowing they caused segfaults, and
> without even stating as much![2]
>   * the segfault "fixes" are submitted as a separate series from the
> patch introducing the segfault[3], raising the risk that one gets
> picked up without the other.

Fair enough.  Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-15  4:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-13 14:31 [PATCH] xdiff: implement a zealous diff3 Felipe Contreras
2021-06-13 15:42 ` Jeff King
2021-06-13 18:00   ` Felipe Contreras
2021-06-13 21:24     ` Felipe Contreras
2021-06-15  2:07       ` Junio C Hamano
2021-06-15  3:43         ` Elijah Newren
2021-06-15  4:03           ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2021-06-15  9:20             ` Felipe Contreras
2021-06-15  9:16           ` Felipe Contreras
2021-06-15 16:59             ` Elijah Newren
2021-06-14  4:44     ` Jeff King
2021-06-15  4:19       ` Felipe Contreras
2021-06-15  9:24         ` Jeff King
2021-06-15 10:24           ` Felipe Contreras
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-03-06 20:03 feature suggestion: optimize common parts for checkout --conflict=diff3 Jeff King
2013-03-06 20:36 ` [PATCH] xdiff: implement a zealous diff3 Uwe Kleine-König
2013-03-06 20:46   ` Jeff King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqr1h3wz8j.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=j6t@kdbg.org \
    --cc=newren@gmail.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=sorganov@gmail.com \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.