All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>,
	Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] KVM/VMX: Invoke NMI non-IST entry instead of IST entry
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 10:46:22 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0bec6872-4d08-d00b-9922-61c5038f2476@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210426230949.3561-4-jiangshanlai@gmail.com>



On 2021/4/27 07:09, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>
> 
> In VMX, the NMI handler needs to be invoked after NMI VM-Exit.
> 
> Before the commit 1a5488ef0dcf6 ("KVM: VMX: Invoke NMI handler via
> indirect call instead of INTn"), the work is done by INTn ("int $2").
> 
> But INTn microcode is relatively expensive, so the commit reworked
> NMI VM-Exit handling to invoke the kernel handler by function call.
> And INTn doesn't set the NMI blocked flag required by the linux kernel
> NMI entry.  So moving away from INTn are very reasonable.
> 
> Yet some details were missed.  After the said commit applied, the NMI
> entry pointer is fetched from the IDT table and called from the kernel
> stack.  But the NMI entry pointer installed on the IDT table is
> asm_exc_nmi() which expects to be invoked on the IST stack by the ISA.
> And it relies on the "NMI executing" variable on the IST stack to work
> correctly.  When it is unexpectedly called from the kernel stack, the
> RSP-located "NMI executing" variable is also on the kernel stack and
> is "uninitialized" and can cause the NMI entry to run in the wrong way.
> 
> So we should not used the NMI entry installed on the IDT table.  Rather,
> we should use the NMI entry allowed to be used on the kernel stack which
> is asm_noist_exc_nmi() which is also used for XENPV and early booting.
> 

The problem can be tested by the following testing-patch.

1) the testing-patch can be applied without conflict before this patch 3.
    And it shows the problem that the NMI is missed in the case.

2) you need to manually copy the same logic of this testing-patch to verify
    this patch 3. And it shows that the problem is fixed.

3) the only one line of code in vmenter.S just emulates the situation that
    a "uninitialized" garbage in the kernel stack happens to be 1 and it happens
    to be at the same location of the RSP-located "NMI executing" variable.


diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S
index 3a6461694fc2..32096049c2a2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S
@@ -316,6 +316,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(vmx_do_interrupt_nmi_irqoff)
  #endif
  	pushf
  	push $__KERNEL_CS
+	movq $1, -24(%rsp) // "NMI executing": 1 = nested, non-1 = not-nested
  	CALL_NOSPEC _ASM_ARG1

  	/*
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index bcbf0d2139e9..9509d2edd50d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -6416,8 +6416,12 @@ static void handle_exception_nmi_irqoff(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
  	else if (is_machine_check(intr_info))
  		kvm_machine_check();
  	/* We need to handle NMIs before interrupts are enabled */
-	else if (is_nmi(intr_info))
+	else if (is_nmi(intr_info)) {
+		unsigned long count = this_cpu_read(irq_stat.__nmi_count);
  		handle_interrupt_nmi_irqoff(&vmx->vcpu, intr_info);
+		if (count == this_cpu_read(irq_stat.__nmi_count))
+			pr_info("kvm nmi miss\n");
+	}
  }

  static void handle_external_interrupt_irqoff(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)


  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-30  2:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-26 23:09 [PATCH 0/4] x86: Don't invoke asm_exc_nmi() on the kernel stack Lai Jiangshan
2021-04-26 23:09 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86/xen/entry: Rename xenpv_exc_nmi to noist_exc_nmi Lai Jiangshan
2021-04-28 21:27   ` Steven Rostedt
2021-04-30  7:15     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-30 12:05       ` Steven Rostedt
2021-05-03 19:05   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-05-03 19:41     ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-05-10  7:59   ` Juergen Gross
2021-04-26 23:09 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86/entry: Use asm_noist_exc_nmi() for NMI in early booting stage Lai Jiangshan
2021-04-28 21:30   ` Steven Rostedt
2021-05-03 20:13   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-05-03 20:24     ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-05-03 21:45       ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-05-04 12:43         ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-05-04 19:50           ` [PATCH] KVM/VMX: Invoke NMI non-IST entry instead of IST entry Thomas Gleixner
2021-05-04 21:05             ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-05-04 21:12               ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-04 21:21                 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-05-04 21:23                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-05-04 21:25                     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-04 21:51                       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-05-04 21:56                         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-05  0:00                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-05-05 15:44                             ` Lai Jiangshan
2021-05-05  1:07                     ` Lai Jiangshan
2021-05-05  1:11                       ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-05-06 12:14             ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Lai Jiangshan
2021-04-26 23:09 ` [PATCH 3/4] " Lai Jiangshan
2021-04-30  2:46   ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2021-05-03 19:37   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-05-03 20:02   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-05-04  8:10     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-26 23:09 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM/VMX: Fold handle_interrupt_nmi_irqoff() into its solo caller Lai Jiangshan
2021-04-30  9:03   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-30  9:06     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-30 23:28       ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-30  7:14 ` [PATCH 0/4] x86: Don't invoke asm_exc_nmi() on the kernel stack Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-03 14:36   ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0bec6872-4d08-d00b-9922-61c5038f2476@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=laijs@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.