All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <axboe@kernel.dk>, <tj@kernel.org>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>, <jmoyer@redhat.com>,
	<Kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH V7 18/18] blk-throttle: add latency target support
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 10:51:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0d512d4589e1d188a27fea1afd60e5611f1533c9.1490634565.git.shli@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1490634565.git.shli@fb.com>

One hard problem adding .low limit is to detect idle cgroup. If one
cgroup doesn't dispatch enough IO against its low limit, we must have a
mechanism to determine if other cgroups dispatch more IO. We added the
think time detection mechanism before, but it doesn't work for all
workloads. Here we add a latency based approach.

We already have mechanism to calculate latency threshold for each IO
size. For every IO dispatched from a cgorup, we compare its latency
against its threshold and record the info. If most IO latency is below
threshold (in the code I use 75%), the cgroup could be treated idle and
other cgroups can dispatch more IO.

Currently this latency target check is only for SSD as we can't
calcualte the latency target for hard disk. And this is only for cgroup
leaf node so far.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
---
 block/blk-throttle.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-throttle.c b/block/blk-throttle.c
index 4b9c6a1..e506d94 100644
--- a/block/blk-throttle.c
+++ b/block/blk-throttle.c
@@ -170,6 +170,10 @@ struct throtl_grp {
 	unsigned long checked_last_finish_time; /* ns / 1024 */
 	unsigned long avg_idletime; /* ns / 1024 */
 	unsigned long idletime_threshold; /* us */
+
+	unsigned int bio_cnt; /* total bios */
+	unsigned int bad_bio_cnt; /* bios exceeding latency threshold */
+	unsigned long bio_cnt_reset_time;
 };
 
 /* We measure latency for request size from <= 4k to >= 1M */
@@ -1725,12 +1729,15 @@ static bool throtl_tg_is_idle(struct throtl_grp *tg)
 	 * - single idle is too long, longer than a fixed value (in case user
 	 *   configure a too big threshold) or 4 times of slice
 	 * - average think time is more than threshold
+	 * - IO latency is largely below threshold
 	 */
 	unsigned long time = jiffies_to_usecs(4 * tg->td->throtl_slice);
 
 	time = min_t(unsigned long, MAX_IDLE_TIME, time);
 	return (ktime_get_ns() >> 10) - tg->last_finish_time > time ||
-	       tg->avg_idletime > tg->idletime_threshold;
+	       tg->avg_idletime > tg->idletime_threshold ||
+	       (tg->latency_target && tg->bio_cnt &&
+		tg->bad_bio_cnt * 5 < tg->bio_cnt);
 }
 
 static bool throtl_tg_can_upgrade(struct throtl_grp *tg)
@@ -2211,12 +2218,36 @@ void blk_throtl_bio_endio(struct bio *bio)
 
 	start_time = THROTL_STAT_TIME(bio->bi_throtl_stat) >> 10;
 	finish_time = THROTL_STAT_TIME(finish_time_ns) >> 10;
-	if (start_time && finish_time > start_time &&
-	    !(bio->bi_throtl_stat & THROTL_SKIP_LAT)) {
-		lat = finish_time - start_time;
+	if (!start_time || finish_time <= start_time)
+		return;
+
+	lat = finish_time - start_time;
+	if (!(bio->bi_throtl_stat & THROTL_SKIP_LAT))
 		throtl_track_latency(tg->td,
 			THROTL_STAT_SIZE(bio->bi_throtl_stat),
 			bio_op(bio), lat);
+
+	if (tg->latency_target) {
+		int bucket;
+		unsigned int threshold;
+
+		bucket = request_bucket_index(
+			THROTL_STAT_SIZE(bio->bi_throtl_stat));
+		threshold = tg->td->avg_buckets[bucket].latency +
+			tg->latency_target;
+		if (lat > threshold)
+			tg->bad_bio_cnt++;
+		/*
+		 * Not race free, could get wrong count, which means cgroups
+		 * will be throttled
+		 */
+		tg->bio_cnt++;
+	}
+
+	if (time_after(jiffies, tg->bio_cnt_reset_time) || tg->bio_cnt > 1024) {
+		tg->bio_cnt_reset_time = tg->td->throtl_slice + jiffies;
+		tg->bio_cnt /= 2;
+		tg->bad_bio_cnt /= 2;
 	}
 }
 #endif
-- 
2.9.3

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-03-27 17:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-27 17:51 [PATCH V7 00/18] blk-throttle: add .low limit Shaohua Li
2017-03-27 17:51 ` [PATCH V7 01/18] blk-throttle: use U64_MAX/UINT_MAX to replace -1 Shaohua Li
2017-03-27 17:51 ` [PATCH V7 02/18] blk-throttle: prepare support multiple limits Shaohua Li
2017-03-27 17:51 ` [PATCH V7 03/18] blk-throttle: add configure option for new .low interface Shaohua Li
2017-03-27 17:51 ` [PATCH V7 04/18] blk-throttle: add " Shaohua Li
2017-03-27 17:51 ` [PATCH V7 05/18] blk-throttle: configure bps/iops limit for cgroup in low limit Shaohua Li
2017-03-27 17:51 ` [PATCH V7 06/18] blk-throttle: add upgrade logic for LIMIT_LOW state Shaohua Li
2017-03-27 17:51 ` [PATCH V7 07/18] blk-throttle: add downgrade logic Shaohua Li
2017-03-27 17:51 ` [PATCH V7 08/18] blk-throttle: make sure expire time isn't too big Shaohua Li
2017-03-27 17:51 ` [PATCH V7 09/18] blk-throttle: make throtl_slice tunable Shaohua Li
2017-03-27 17:51 ` [PATCH V7 10/18] blk-throttle: choose a small throtl_slice for SSD Shaohua Li
2017-03-27 17:51 ` [PATCH V7 11/18] blk-throttle: detect completed idle cgroup Shaohua Li
2017-03-27 17:51 ` [PATCH V7 12/18] blk-throttle: make bandwidth change smooth Shaohua Li
2017-03-27 17:51 ` [PATCH V7 13/18] blk-throttle: add a simple idle detection Shaohua Li
2017-03-27 17:51 ` [PATCH V7 14/18] blk-throttle: add interface to configure idle time threshold Shaohua Li
2017-03-27 17:51 ` [PATCH V7 15/18] blk-throttle: ignore idle cgroup limit Shaohua Li
2017-03-27 17:51 ` [PATCH V7 16/18] blk-throttle: add interface for per-cgroup target latency Shaohua Li
2017-03-27 17:51 ` [PATCH V7 17/18] blk-throttle: add a mechanism to estimate IO latency Shaohua Li
2017-03-27 17:51 ` Shaohua Li [this message]
2017-03-27 18:15 ` [PATCH V7 00/18] blk-throttle: add .low limit Jens Axboe
2017-03-27 19:00   ` Shaohua Li
2017-03-27 19:11     ` Jens Axboe
2017-03-27 22:19       ` [PATCH 0/3] blk-throttle: add .low limit fix Shaohua Li
2017-03-27 22:19         ` [PATCH 1/3] block: track request size in blk_issue_stat Shaohua Li
2017-03-27 22:19         ` [PATCH 2/3] blk-throttle: add a mechanism to estimate IO latency Shaohua Li
2017-03-27 22:19         ` [PATCH 3/3] blk-throttle: add latency target support Shaohua Li
2017-03-28 15:58         ` [PATCH 0/3] blk-throttle: add .low limit fix Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0d512d4589e1d188a27fea1afd60e5611f1533c9.1490634565.git.shli@fb.com \
    --to=shli@fb.com \
    --cc=Kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.