All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, clm@fb.com, jbacik@fb.com,
	bo.li.liu@oracle.com, dsterba@suse.cz, chandan@mykolab.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] Btrfs: __btrfs_buffered_write: Reserve/release extents aligned to block size
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 09:46:37 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <11805820.gzp5AJPmpI@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55C4212E.90609@cn.fujitsu.com>

On Friday 07 Aug 2015 11:08:30 Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Hi Chanda,
> 
> Thanks for your effort to implement sub pagesize block size.
> 
> These cleanups look quite good, but still some small readablity
> recommendation inlined below.
> 
> Chandan Rajendra wrote on 2015/08/06 15:40 +0530:
> > Currently, the code reserves/releases extents in multiples of
> > PAGE_CACHE_SIZE units. Fix this by doing reservation/releases in block
> > size units.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > 
> >   fs/btrfs/file.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> >   1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c
> > index 795d754..e3b2b3c 100644
> > --- a/fs/btrfs/file.c
> > +++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c
> > 
> > @@ -1362,16 +1362,19 @@ fail:
> >   static noinline int
> >   lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_need(struct inode *inode, struct page
> >   **pages,
> >   
> >   				size_t num_pages, loff_t pos,
> > 
> > +				size_t write_bytes,
> > 
> >   				u64 *lockstart, u64 *lockend,
> >   				struct extent_state **cached_state)
> >   
> >   {
> > 
> > +	struct btrfs_root *root = BTRFS_I(inode)->root;
> > 
> >   	u64 start_pos;
> >   	u64 last_pos;
> >   	int i;
> >   	int ret = 0;
> > 
> > -	start_pos = pos & ~((u64)PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - 1);
> > -	last_pos = start_pos + ((u64)num_pages << PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT) - 1;
> > +	start_pos = pos & ~((u64)root->sectorsize - 1);
> 
> Why not just roundown(pos, root->sectorisze)
> Hard coded align is never that easy to read.

Qu Wenruo, Thanks for pointing it out. I will replace them with
round_[down,up] calls and post V2. 

> 
> > +	last_pos = start_pos
> > +		+ ALIGN(pos + write_bytes - start_pos, root->sectorsize) - 1;
> 
> Maybe just a preference problem, I'd prefer to use round_down other than
> ALIGN, as sometimes I still need to figure out if it is round_down or
> round_down.
> 
> >   	if (start_pos < inode->i_size) {
> >   	
> >   		struct btrfs_ordered_extent *ordered;
> > 
> > @@ -1489,6 +1492,7 @@ static noinline ssize_t
> > __btrfs_buffered_write(struct file *file,> 
> >   	while (iov_iter_count(i) > 0) {
> >   	
> >   		size_t offset = pos & (PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - 1);
> > 
> > +		size_t sector_offset;
> > 
> >   		size_t write_bytes = min(iov_iter_count(i),
> >   		
> >   					 nrptrs * (size_t)PAGE_CACHE_SIZE -
> >   					 offset);
> > 
> > @@ -1497,6 +1501,8 @@ static noinline ssize_t
> > __btrfs_buffered_write(struct file *file,> 
> >   		size_t reserve_bytes;
> >   		size_t dirty_pages;
> >   		size_t copied;
> > 
> > +		size_t dirty_sectors;
> > +		size_t num_sectors;
> > 
> >   		WARN_ON(num_pages > nrptrs);
> > 
> > @@ -1509,8 +1515,12 @@ static noinline ssize_t
> > __btrfs_buffered_write(struct file *file,> 
> >   			break;
> >   		
> >   		}
> > 
> > -		reserve_bytes = num_pages << PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
> > +		sector_offset = pos & (root->sectorsize - 1);
> 
> Same here.
> 
> Thanks,
> Qu
> 
> > +		reserve_bytes = ALIGN(write_bytes + sector_offset,
> > +				root->sectorsize);
> > +
> > 
> >   		ret = btrfs_check_data_free_space(inode, reserve_bytes, 
write_bytes);
> > 
> > +
> > 
> >   		if (ret == -ENOSPC &&
> >   		
> >   		    (BTRFS_I(inode)->flags & (BTRFS_INODE_NODATACOW |
> >   		    
> >   					      BTRFS_INODE_PREALLOC))) {
> > 
> > @@ -1523,7 +1533,9 @@ static noinline ssize_t
> > __btrfs_buffered_write(struct file *file,> 
> >   				 */
> >   				
> >   				num_pages = DIV_ROUND_UP(write_bytes + offset,
> >   				
> >   							 PAGE_CACHE_SIZE);
> > 
> > -				reserve_bytes = num_pages << PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
> > +				reserve_bytes = ALIGN(write_bytes + 
sector_offset,
> > +						root->sectorsize);
> > +
> > 
> >   				ret = 0;
> >   			
> >   			} else {
> >   			
> >   				ret = -ENOSPC;
> > 
> > @@ -1558,8 +1570,8 @@ again:
> >   			break;
> >   		
> >   		ret = lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_need(inode, pages, num_pages,
> > 
> > -						      pos, &lockstart, 
&lockend,
> > -						      &cached_state);
> > +						pos, write_bytes, &lockstart,
> > +						&lockend, &cached_state);
> > 
> >   		if (ret < 0) {
> >   		
> >   			if (ret == -EAGAIN)
> >   			
> >   				goto again;
> > 
> > @@ -1595,9 +1607,14 @@ again:
> >   		 * we still have an outstanding extent for the chunk we 
actually
> >   		 * managed to copy.
> >   		 */
> > 
> > -		if (num_pages > dirty_pages) {
> > -			release_bytes = (num_pages - dirty_pages) <<
> > -				PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
> > +		num_sectors = reserve_bytes >> inode->i_blkbits;
> > +		dirty_sectors = round_up(copied + sector_offset,
> > +					root->sectorsize);
> > +		dirty_sectors >>= inode->i_blkbits;
> > +
> > +		if (num_sectors > dirty_sectors) {
> > +			release_bytes = (write_bytes - copied)
> > +				& ~((u64)root->sectorsize - 1);
> > 
> >   			if (copied > 0) {
> >   			
> >   				spin_lock(&BTRFS_I(inode)->lock);
> >   				BTRFS_I(inode)->outstanding_extents++;
> > 
> > @@ -1611,7 +1628,7 @@ again:
> >   							     release_bytes);
> >   		
> >   		}
> > 
> > -		release_bytes = dirty_pages << PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
> > +		release_bytes = ALIGN(copied + sector_offset, root-
>sectorsize);
> > 
> >   		if (copied > 0)
> >   		
> >   			ret = btrfs_dirty_pages(root, inode, pages,
> > 
> > @@ -1632,8 +1649,7 @@ again:
> >   		if (only_release_metadata && copied > 0) {
> >   		
> >   			lockstart = round_down(pos, root->sectorsize);
> > 
> > -			lockend = lockstart +
> > -				(dirty_pages << PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT) - 1;
> > +			lockend = round_up(pos + copied, root->sectorsize) - 
1;
> > 
> >   			set_extent_bit(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, lockstart,
> >   			
> >   				       lockend, EXTENT_NORESERVE, NULL,

-- 
chandan


  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-07  4:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-06 10:10 [PATCH 00/11] Btrfs: Pre subpagesize-blocksize cleanups Chandan Rajendra
2015-08-06 10:10 ` [PATCH 01/11] Btrfs: __btrfs_buffered_write: Reserve/release extents aligned to block size Chandan Rajendra
2015-08-07  3:08   ` Qu Wenruo
2015-08-07  4:16     ` Chandan Rajendra [this message]
2015-08-06 10:10 ` [PATCH 02/11] Btrfs: Compute and look up csums based on sectorsized blocks Chandan Rajendra
2015-08-06 10:10 ` [PATCH 03/11] Btrfs: Direct I/O read: Work " Chandan Rajendra
2015-08-06 10:10 ` [PATCH 04/11] Btrfs: fallocate: Work with " Chandan Rajendra
2015-08-06 10:10 ` [PATCH 05/11] Btrfs: btrfs_page_mkwrite: Reserve space in sectorsized units Chandan Rajendra
2015-08-06 10:10 ` [PATCH 06/11] Btrfs: Search for all ordered extents that could span across a page Chandan Rajendra
2015-08-06 10:10 ` [PATCH 07/11] Btrfs: Use (eb->start, seq) as search key for tree modification log Chandan Rajendra
2015-08-06 10:10 ` [PATCH 08/11] Btrfs: btrfs_submit_direct_hook: Handle map_length < bio vector length Chandan Rajendra
2015-08-06 10:10 ` [PATCH 09/11] Btrfs: Limit inline extents to root->sectorsize Chandan Rajendra
2015-08-06 10:10 ` [PATCH 10/11] Btrfs: Fix block size returned to user space Chandan Rajendra
2015-08-06 10:10 ` [PATCH 11/11] Btrfs: Clean pte corresponding to page straddling i_size Chandan Rajendra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=11805820.gzp5AJPmpI@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=bo.li.liu@oracle.com \
    --cc=chandan@mykolab.com \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=jbacik@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.