All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	patches@lists.linux.dev,
	Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>,
	David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	<rafael@kernel.org>, Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] of: Load KUnit DTB from of_core_init()
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 11:15:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <12903a61f64206be837c1f0744632f29.sboyd@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230321173303.GA950598-robh@kernel.org>

Quoting Rob Herring (2023-03-21 10:33:03)
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 11:37:18AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/of/of_test.c b/drivers/of/of_test.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..a4d70ac344ad
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/of/of_test.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +/*
> > + * KUnit tests for OF APIs
> > + */
> > +#include <linux/kconfig.h>
> > +#include <linux/of.h>
> > +
> > +#include <kunit/test.h>
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Test that the root node / exists.
> > + */
> > +static void dtb_root_node_exists(struct kunit *test)
> > +{
> > +     KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, of_find_node_by_path("/"));
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Test that the /__symbols__ node exists.
> > + */
> > +static void dtb_symbols_node_exists(struct kunit *test)
> > +{
> > +     KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, of_find_node_by_path("/__symbols__"));
> > +}
> 
> Many base DTs will not have this. And the kunit tests themselves 
> shouldn't need it because they should be independent of the base tree.
> 

When I try to apply an overlay it fails 

 OF: overlay: no fragments or symbols in overlay
 OF: overlay: init_overlay_changeset() failed, ret = -22
     # of_overlay_apply_kunit_apply: ASSERTION FAILED at drivers/of/overlay_test.c:18
     Expected 0 == ({ extern uint8_t __dtbo_kunit_overlay_test_begin[]; extern uint8_t __dtbo_kunit_overlay_test_end[]; __of_overlay_apply_kunit((test), __dtbo_kunit_overlay_test_begin, __dtbo_kunit_overlay_test_end); }), but
         ({ extern uint8_t __dtbo_kunit_overlay_test_begin[]; extern uint8_t __dtbo_kunit_overlay_test_end[]; __of_overlay_apply_kunit((test), __dtbo_kunit_overlay_test_begin, __dtbo_kunit_overlay_test_end); }) == -12 (0xfffffffffffffff4)
 [FAILED] of_overlay_apply_kunit_apply

Now I'm trying to hack on the fake root node to see if I can make it work.

---8<---
diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
index 090c5d7925e4..12c44c86b8ae 100644
--- a/drivers/of/base.c
+++ b/drivers/of/base.c
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ void __of_phandle_cache_inv_entry(phandle handle)
 		phandle_cache[handle_hash] = NULL;
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_OF_KUNIT
+#if 0
 static int __init of_kunit_add_data(void)
 {
 	void *kunit_fdt;
diff --git a/drivers/of/kunit_overlay_test.dtso b/drivers/of/kunit_overlay_test.dtso
index 6e70e2f8cd90..e3ced1467dd9 100644
--- a/drivers/of/kunit_overlay_test.dtso
+++ b/drivers/of/kunit_overlay_test.dtso
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 /dts-v1/;
 /plugin/;
 
-&kunit_bus {
+/ {
 	test-kunit {
 		compatible = "test,kunit-empty";
 	};
diff --git a/drivers/of/of_test.c b/drivers/of/of_test.c
index 543fdf0936f6..08b670aee083 100644
--- a/drivers/of/of_test.c
+++ b/drivers/of/of_test.c
@@ -15,17 +15,8 @@ static void dtb_root_node_exists(struct kunit *test)
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, of_find_node_by_path("/"));
 }
 
-/*
- * Test that the /__symbols__ node exists.
- */
-static void dtb_symbols_node_exists(struct kunit *test)
-{
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, of_find_node_by_path("/__symbols__"));
-}
-
 static struct kunit_case dtb_test_cases[] = {
 	KUNIT_CASE(dtb_root_node_exists),
-	KUNIT_CASE(dtb_symbols_node_exists),
 	{}
 };

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-21 18:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-15 18:37 [PATCH v2 00/11] clk: Add kunit tests for fixed rate and parent data Stephen Boyd
2023-03-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] of: Load KUnit DTB from of_core_init() Stephen Boyd
2023-03-21 17:33   ` Rob Herring
2023-03-21 17:56     ` Stephen Boyd
2023-03-21 18:15     ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2023-03-21 18:24       ` Stephen Boyd
2023-03-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] of: Add test managed wrappers for of_overlay_apply()/of_node_put() Stephen Boyd
2023-03-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Add "test" vendor for KUnit and friends Stephen Boyd
2023-03-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] dt-bindings: test: Add KUnit empty node binding Stephen Boyd
2023-03-21 20:09   ` Rob Herring
2023-03-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] of: Add a KUnit test for overlays and test managed APIs Stephen Boyd
2023-03-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] platform: Add test managed platform_device/driver APIs Stephen Boyd
2023-03-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] dt-bindings: kunit: Add fixed rate clk consumer test Stephen Boyd
2023-03-21 20:14   ` Rob Herring
2023-03-21 20:23     ` Stephen Boyd
2023-03-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] clk: Add test managed clk provider/consumer APIs Stephen Boyd
2023-03-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] clk: Add KUnit tests for clk fixed rate basic type Stephen Boyd
2023-03-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] dt-bindings: clk: Add KUnit clk_parent_data test Stephen Boyd
2023-03-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] clk: Add KUnit tests for clks registered with struct clk_parent_data Stephen Boyd
2023-03-17  8:22 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] clk: Add kunit tests for fixed rate and parent data David Gow
2023-03-21 21:39   ` Stephen Boyd
2023-03-17  8:39 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-03-17 18:13   ` Stephen Boyd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=12903a61f64206be837c1f0744632f29.sboyd@kernel.org \
    --to=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=ansuelsmth@gmail.com \
    --cc=brendan.higgins@linux.dev \
    --cc=davidgow@google.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxime@cerno.tech \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.