From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Subject: [PATCH 7/7] radeon: kill rdev->pciep_(r|w)reg
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 19:06:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1290967575-22705-8-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1290967575-22705-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
pciep_wreg is totally unused, rreg has only one caller and
already checks whether it's an r600 or later chip.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r300.c | 3 ++-
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c | 8 --------
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h | 4 ----
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_asic.c | 6 ------
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_asic.h | 1 -
5 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r300.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r300.c
index cde1d34..6def8d7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r300.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r300.c
@@ -561,7 +561,8 @@ int rv370_get_pcie_lanes(struct radeon_device *rdev)
if (rdev->family < CHIP_R600)
link_width_cntl = RREG32_PCIE(RADEON_PCIE_LC_LINK_WIDTH_CNTL);
else
- link_width_cntl = RREG32_PCIE_P(RADEON_PCIE_LC_LINK_WIDTH_CNTL);
+ link_width_cntl = r600_pciep_rreg(rdev,
+ RADEON_PCIE_LC_LINK_WIDTH_CNTL);
switch ((link_width_cntl & RADEON_PCIE_LC_LINK_WIDTH_RD_MASK) >> RADEON_PCIE_LC_LINK_WIDTH_RD_SHIFT) {
case RADEON_PCIE_LC_LINK_WIDTH_X0:
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c
index b55ee28..a5114ff 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c
@@ -1905,14 +1905,6 @@ u32 r600_pciep_rreg(struct radeon_device *rdev, u32 reg)
return r;
}
-void r600_pciep_wreg(struct radeon_device *rdev, u32 reg, u32 v)
-{
- WREG32(PCIE_PORT_INDEX, ((reg) & 0xff));
- (void)RREG32(PCIE_PORT_INDEX);
- WREG32(PCIE_PORT_DATA, (v));
- (void)RREG32(PCIE_PORT_DATA);
-}
-
/*
* CP & Ring
*/
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
index 7afb08e..5fec64c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
@@ -1117,8 +1117,6 @@ struct radeon_device {
radeon_rreg_t pll_rreg;
radeon_wreg_t pll_wreg;
uint32_t pcie_reg_mask;
- radeon_rreg_t pciep_rreg;
- radeon_wreg_t pciep_wreg;
/* io port */
void __iomem *rio_mem;
resource_size_t rio_mem_size;
@@ -1223,8 +1221,6 @@ static inline void r100_mm_wreg(struct radeon_device *rdev, uint32_t reg, uint32
#define WREG32_MC(reg, v) rdev->mc_wreg(rdev, (reg), (v))
#define RREG32_PCIE(reg) rv370_pcie_rreg(rdev, (reg))
#define WREG32_PCIE(reg, v) rv370_pcie_wreg(rdev, (reg), (v))
-#define RREG32_PCIE_P(reg) rdev->pciep_rreg(rdev, (reg))
-#define WREG32_PCIE_P(reg, v) rdev->pciep_wreg(rdev, (reg), (v))
#define WREG32_P(reg, val, mask) \
do { \
uint32_t tmp_ = RREG32(reg); \
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_asic.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_asic.c
index 3d73fe4..668351c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_asic.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_asic.c
@@ -60,8 +60,6 @@ static void radeon_register_accessor_init(struct radeon_device *rdev)
rdev->mc_wreg = &radeon_invalid_wreg;
rdev->pll_rreg = &radeon_invalid_rreg;
rdev->pll_wreg = &radeon_invalid_wreg;
- rdev->pciep_rreg = &radeon_invalid_rreg;
- rdev->pciep_wreg = &radeon_invalid_wreg;
/* Don't change order as we are overridding accessor. */
if (rdev->family < CHIP_RV515) {
@@ -94,10 +92,6 @@ static void radeon_register_accessor_init(struct radeon_device *rdev)
rdev->mc_rreg = &rs600_mc_rreg;
rdev->mc_wreg = &rs600_mc_wreg;
}
- if ((rdev->family >= CHIP_R600) && (rdev->family <= CHIP_RV740)) {
- rdev->pciep_rreg = &r600_pciep_rreg;
- rdev->pciep_wreg = &r600_pciep_wreg;
- }
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_asic.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_asic.h
index 8e75be1..bad4b88 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_asic.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_asic.h
@@ -294,7 +294,6 @@ void r600_wb_fini(struct radeon_device *rdev);
void r600_cp_commit(struct radeon_device *rdev);
void r600_pcie_gart_tlb_flush(struct radeon_device *rdev);
uint32_t r600_pciep_rreg(struct radeon_device *rdev, uint32_t reg);
-void r600_pciep_wreg(struct radeon_device *rdev, uint32_t reg, uint32_t v);
int r600_cs_parse(struct radeon_cs_parser *p);
void r600_fence_ring_emit(struct radeon_device *rdev,
struct radeon_fence *fence);
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-28 18:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-28 18:06 [PATCH 0/7] radeon_asic header cleanup, part 2 Daniel Vetter
2010-11-28 18:06 ` [PATCH 1/7] radeon: consolidate asic-specific function decls for pre-r600 Daniel Vetter
2010-11-29 15:29 ` Alex Deucher
2010-11-28 18:06 ` [PATCH 2/7] radeon: consolidate asic-specific function decls for r600 & later Daniel Vetter
2010-11-29 15:34 ` Alex Deucher
2010-11-28 18:06 ` [PATCH 3/7] radeon: drop extern from function decls Daniel Vetter
2010-11-29 15:36 ` Alex Deucher
2010-11-28 18:06 ` [PATCH 4/7] radeon: kill decls for inline functions Daniel Vetter
2010-11-29 15:37 ` Alex Deucher
2010-11-28 18:06 ` [PATCH 5/7] radeon: move blit functions to radeon_asic.h Daniel Vetter
2010-11-29 15:37 ` Alex Deucher
2010-11-28 18:06 ` [PATCH 6/7] radeon: kill r100_io_(r|w)reg Daniel Vetter
2010-11-29 15:40 ` Alex Deucher
2010-11-28 18:06 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2010-11-29 15:43 ` [PATCH 7/7] radeon: kill rdev->pciep_(r|w)reg Alex Deucher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1290967575-22705-8-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--to=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.