All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
To: Fred Isaman <iisaman@netapp.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/15] pnfs: change lo refcounting to atomic_t
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 16:47:59 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1293054479.6422.18.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1292990449-20057-12-git-send-email-iisaman@netapp.com>

On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 23:00 -0500, Fred Isaman wrote:
> This will be required to allow us to grab reference outside of i_lock.
> While we are at it, make put_layout_hdr take the same argument as all the
> related functions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fred Isaman <iisaman@netapp.com>
> ---
>  fs/nfs/pnfs.c |   50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>  fs/nfs/pnfs.h |    4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> index 970cc3b..53a0184 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> @@ -177,34 +177,40 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pnfs_unregister_layoutdriver);
>   * pNFS client layout cache
>   */
>  
> +/* Need to hold i_lock if caller does not already hold reference */
>  static void
> -get_layout_hdr_locked(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo)
> +get_layout_hdr(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo)
>  {
> -	assert_spin_locked(&lo->plh_inode->i_lock);
> -	lo->plh_refcount++;
> +	atomic_inc(&lo->plh_refcount);
>  }
>  
>  static void
> -put_layout_hdr_locked(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo)
> +destroy_layout_hdr(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo)
>  {
> -	assert_spin_locked(&lo->plh_inode->i_lock);
> -	BUG_ON(lo->plh_refcount == 0);
> +	dprintk("%s: freeing layout cache %p\n", __func__, lo);
> +	BUG_ON(!list_empty(&lo->plh_layouts));
> +	NFS_I(lo->plh_inode)->layout = NULL;
> +	kfree(lo);
> +}
>  
> -	lo->plh_refcount--;
> -	if (!lo->plh_refcount) {
> -		dprintk("%s: freeing layout cache %p\n", __func__, lo);
> -		BUG_ON(!list_empty(&lo->plh_layouts));
> -		NFS_I(lo->plh_inode)->layout = NULL;
> -		kfree(lo);
> -	}
> +static void
> +put_layout_hdr_locked(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo)
> +{
> +	BUG_ON(atomic_read(&lo->plh_refcount) == 0);

Isn't this debugged by now?

> +	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&lo->plh_refcount))
> +		destroy_layout_hdr(lo);
>  }
>  
>  void
> -put_layout_hdr(struct inode *inode)
> +put_layout_hdr(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo)
>  {
> -	spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
> -	put_layout_hdr_locked(NFS_I(inode)->layout);
> -	spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> +	struct inode *inode = lo->plh_inode;
> +
> +	BUG_ON(atomic_read(&lo->plh_refcount) == 0);
Ditto....

> +	if (atomic_dec_and_lock(&lo->plh_refcount, &inode->i_lock)) {
> +		destroy_layout_hdr(lo);
> +		spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  static void
> @@ -224,7 +230,7 @@ static void free_lseg(struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg)
>  	BUG_ON(atomic_read(&lseg->pls_refcount) != 0);
>  	NFS_SERVER(ino)->pnfs_curr_ld->free_lseg(lseg);
>  	/* Matched by get_layout_hdr in pnfs_insert_layout */
> -	put_layout_hdr(ino);
> +	put_layout_hdr(NFS_I(ino)->layout);
>  }
>  
>  /* The use of tmp_list is necessary because pnfs_curr_ld->free_lseg
> @@ -481,7 +487,7 @@ pnfs_insert_layout(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo,
>  			__func__, lseg, lseg->pls_range.iomode,
>  			lseg->pls_range.offset, lseg->pls_range.length);
>  	}
> -	get_layout_hdr_locked(lo);
> +	get_layout_hdr(lo);
>  
>  	dprintk("%s:Return\n", __func__);
>  }
> @@ -494,7 +500,7 @@ alloc_init_layout_hdr(struct inode *ino)
>  	lo = kzalloc(sizeof(struct pnfs_layout_hdr), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!lo)
>  		return NULL;
> -	lo->plh_refcount = 1;
> +	atomic_set(&lo->plh_refcount, 1);
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&lo->plh_layouts);
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&lo->plh_segs);
>  	lo->plh_inode = ino;
> @@ -609,7 +615,7 @@ pnfs_update_layout(struct inode *ino,
>  		goto out_unlock;
>  	atomic_inc(&lo->plh_outstanding);
>  
> -	get_layout_hdr_locked(lo);
> +	get_layout_hdr(lo);
>  	if (list_empty(&lo->plh_segs)) {
>  		/* The lo must be on the clp list if there is any
>  		 * chance of a CB_LAYOUTRECALL(FILE) coming in.
> @@ -632,7 +638,7 @@ pnfs_update_layout(struct inode *ino,
>  		spin_unlock(&ino->i_lock);
>  	}
>  	atomic_dec(&lo->plh_outstanding);
> -	put_layout_hdr(ino);
> +	put_layout_hdr(lo);
>  out:
>  	dprintk("%s end, state 0x%lx lseg %p\n", __func__,
>  		nfsi->layout->plh_flags, lseg);
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.h b/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
> index 698380d..8aaab56 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
> +++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
> @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ struct pnfs_layoutdriver_type {
>  };
>  
>  struct pnfs_layout_hdr {
> -	unsigned long		plh_refcount;
> +	atomic_t		plh_refcount;
>  	struct list_head	plh_layouts;   /* other client layouts */
>  	struct list_head	plh_segs;      /* layout segments list */
>  	nfs4_stateid		plh_stateid;
> @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ void unset_pnfs_layoutdriver(struct nfs_server *);
>  int pnfs_layout_process(struct nfs4_layoutget *lgp);
>  void pnfs_destroy_layout(struct nfs_inode *);
>  void pnfs_destroy_all_layouts(struct nfs_client *);
> -void put_layout_hdr(struct inode *inode);
> +void put_layout_hdr(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo);
>  int pnfs_choose_layoutget_stateid(nfs4_stateid *dst,
>  				  struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo,
>  				  struct nfs4_state *open_state);

-- 
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer

NetApp
Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com
www.netapp.com


  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-22 21:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-22  4:00 [PATCH 00/15] pnfs wave 2 submission, try 2 Fred Isaman
2010-12-22  4:00 ` [PATCH 01/15] pnfs: fix incorrect comment in destroy_lseg Fred Isaman
2010-12-22  4:00 ` [PATCH 02/15] pnfs: remove unnecessary field lgp->status Fred Isaman
2010-12-22  4:00 ` [PATCH 03/15] pnfs: add prefix to struct pnfs_layout_segment fields Fred Isaman
2010-12-22  4:00 ` [PATCH 04/15] pnfs: add prefix to struct pnfs_layout_hdr fields Fred Isaman
2010-12-22  4:00 ` [PATCH 05/15] pnfs: change layout state seqlock to a spinlock Fred Isaman
2010-12-22  4:00 ` [PATCH 06/15] pnfs: change how lsegs are removed from layout list Fred Isaman
2010-12-22 21:43   ` Trond Myklebust
2010-12-22 22:08     ` Fred Isaman
2010-12-22 23:35       ` Trond Myklebust
2010-12-22 23:49         ` Fred Isaman
2010-12-22  4:00 ` [PATCH 07/15] pnfs: layoutget rpc code cleanup Fred Isaman
2010-12-22  4:00 ` [PATCH 08/15] pnfs: serialize LAYOUTGET(openstateid) Fred Isaman
2010-12-22  4:00 ` [PATCH 09/15] pnfs: add layout to client list before sending rpc Fred Isaman
2010-12-22  4:00 ` [PATCH 10/15] pnfs: check that partial LAYOUTGET return is ignored Fred Isaman
2010-12-22  4:00 ` [PATCH 11/15] pnfs: change lo refcounting to atomic_t Fred Isaman
2010-12-22 21:47   ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
     [not found]     ` <1293054479.6422.18.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2010-12-22 22:08       ` Fred Isaman
2010-12-22  4:00 ` [PATCH 12/15] pnfs: CB_LAYOUTRECALL xdr code Fred Isaman
2010-12-22  4:00 ` [PATCH 13/15] pnfs: add CB_LAYOUTRECALL handling Fred Isaman
2010-12-22  4:00 ` [PATCH 14/15] pnfs: update nfs4_callback_recallany to handle layouts Fred Isaman
2010-12-22  4:00 ` [PATCH 15/15] pnfs: layout roc code Fred Isaman
2010-12-22 22:00   ` Trond Myklebust
2010-12-23  0:19     ` Fred Isaman
2010-12-26  8:40       ` Benny Halevy
2010-12-26 13:58         ` Fred Isaman
2010-12-23 12:47 [PATCH 00/15] pnfs wave 2 submission, try 3 Fred Isaman
2010-12-23 12:47 ` [PATCH 11/15] pnfs: change lo refcounting to atomic_t Fred Isaman
2010-12-23 17:29 [PATCH 00/15] pnfs wave 2 submission, try 4 Fred Isaman
2010-12-23 17:29 ` [PATCH 11/15] pnfs: change lo refcounting to atomic_t Fred Isaman
2010-12-23 23:54 [PATCH 00/15] pnfs wave 2 submission, try 5 Fred Isaman
2010-12-23 23:54 ` [PATCH 11/15] pnfs: change lo refcounting to atomic_t Fred Isaman
2011-01-06 11:36 [PATCH 00/15] pnfs wave 2 submission Fred Isaman
2011-01-06 11:36 ` [PATCH 11/15] pnfs: change lo refcounting to atomic_t Fred Isaman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1293054479.6422.18.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org \
    --to=trond.myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=iisaman@netapp.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.