All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 02/15] ARM: perf: only register a CPU PMU when present
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 14:55:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1313416516-8006-3-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1313416516-8006-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com>

Currently, an "empty" struct pmu is registered as the CPU PMU,
regardless of whether there is a physical PMU. This burdens the
accessor functions with checks to see whether a PMU is actually
present.

This patch changes initialisation to register a PMU only if there is a
supported PMU present, and removes the checks that this change makes
redundant.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c |   18 ++----------------
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
index 5d60c9c..753648c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -250,9 +250,6 @@ armpmu_stop(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
 {
 	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
 
-	if (!armpmu)
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * ARM pmu always has to update the counter, so ignore
 	 * PERF_EF_UPDATE, see comments in armpmu_start().
@@ -270,9 +267,6 @@ armpmu_start(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
 {
 	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
 
-	if (!armpmu)
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * ARM pmu always has to reprogram the period, so ignore
 	 * PERF_EF_RELOAD, see the comment below.
@@ -567,9 +561,6 @@ static int armpmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
 		return -ENOENT;
 	}
 
-	if (!armpmu)
-		return -ENODEV;
-
 	event->destroy = hw_perf_event_destroy;
 
 	if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&active_events)) {
@@ -599,9 +590,6 @@ static void armpmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
 	int idx, enabled = 0;
 	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
 
-	if (!armpmu)
-		return;
-
 	for (idx = 0; idx < armpmu->num_events; ++idx) {
 		struct perf_event *event = cpuc->events[idx];
 
@@ -618,8 +606,7 @@ static void armpmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
 
 static void armpmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
 {
-	if (armpmu)
-		armpmu->stop();
+	armpmu->stop();
 }
 
 static struct pmu pmu = {
@@ -738,12 +725,11 @@ init_hw_perf_events(void)
 	if (armpmu) {
 		pr_info("enabled with %s PMU driver, %d counters available\n",
 			armpmu->name, armpmu->num_events);
+		perf_pmu_register(&pmu, "cpu", PERF_TYPE_RAW);
 	} else {
 		pr_info("no hardware support available\n");
 	}
 
-	perf_pmu_register(&pmu, "cpu", PERF_TYPE_RAW);
-
 	return 0;
 }
 early_initcall(init_hw_perf_events);
-- 
1.7.0.4

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-08-15 13:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-15 13:55 [RFC PATCH 00/15] ARM: perf: support multiple PMUs Mark Rutland
2011-08-15 13:55 ` [RFC PATCH 01/15] perf: provide PMU when initing events Mark Rutland
2011-08-15 13:55 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2011-08-15 13:55 ` [RFC PATCH 03/15] ARM: perf: clean up event group validation Mark Rutland
2011-08-15 13:55 ` [RFC PATCH 04/15] ARM: perf: remove active_mask Mark Rutland
2011-08-15 13:55 ` [RFC PATCH 05/15] ARM: perf: move active_events into struct arm_pmu Mark Rutland
2011-08-15 13:55 ` [RFC PATCH 06/15] ARM: perf: move platform device to " Mark Rutland
2011-08-15 13:55 ` [RFC PATCH 07/15] ARM: perf: indirect access to cpu_hw_events Mark Rutland
2011-08-15 13:55 ` [RFC PATCH 08/15] ARM: perf: remove unnecessary armpmu->stop Mark Rutland
2011-08-15 13:55 ` [RFC PATCH 09/15] ARM: perf: lock PMU registers per-CPU Mark Rutland
2011-08-15 13:55 ` [RFC PATCH 10/15] ARM: perf: add type field to struct arm_pmu Mark Rutland
2011-08-15 13:55 ` [RFC PATCH 11/15] ARM: perf: refactor event mapping Mark Rutland
2011-08-15 13:55 ` [RFC PATCH 12/15] ARM: perf: add support for multiple PMUs Mark Rutland
2011-08-15 13:55 ` [RFC PATCH 13/15] ARM: perf: remove event limit from pmu_hw_events Mark Rutland
2011-08-15 13:55 ` [RFC PATCH 14/15] ARM: perf: remove cpu-related misnomers Mark Rutland
2011-08-15 13:55 ` [RFC PATCH 15/15] ARM: perf: move arm_pmu into <asm/pmu.h> Mark Rutland
2011-08-17 14:12 ` [RFC PATCH 00/15] ARM: perf: support multiple PMUs Jamie Iles
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-04-27  9:31 [RFC PATCH 02/15] ARM: perf: only register a CPU PMU when present Mark Rutland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1313416516-8006-3-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.