Re: [PATCH 0/2] virtio-scsi fixes for 3.6

From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] virtio-scsi fixes for 3.6
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 09:18:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1349165906.2406.13.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50699682.9020804@redhat.com>

On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 15:11 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 26/07/2012 15:28, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto:
> > James,
> > 
> > patch 1 fixes scanning of LUNs whose number is greater than 255.  QEMU
> > passes a max_lun of 16383 (because it uses SAM numbering) but in Linux
> > it must become 32768 (because LUNs above 255 are "relocated" to 16640).
> > Patch 2 is a resubmission of the patch for online resizing of virtio-scsi
> > LUNs, which needs to be rebased.
> > 
> > LUNs above 255 now work for all of scanning, hotplug, hotunplug and
> > resize.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Paolo
> > 
> > Paolo Bonzini (2):
> >   virtio-scsi: fix LUNs greater than 255
> >   virtio-scsi: support online resizing of disks
> > 
> >  drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c  |   37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  include/linux/virtio_scsi.h |    2 ++
> >  2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> 
> Ping, are these patches going into 3.7?

They're 3.7 candidates yes (enhancements certainly aren't 3.6).  I seem
to have become lost with the virtio-scsi updates since what I have
marked for inclusion is a patch series that's a partial intersection
with this.  I'll flush my queue for virto-scsi, please resend all the
missing patches you want in 3.7.

Thanks,

James